Plato vs Aristotle Essay

In The Republic, Plato builds around the idea of Philosopher Rulers. Even though it is not his primary point, it certainly is at the core of his discussion of the ideal state. The question that arises is, 'Why do you need ideal states which will have philosophers as rulers?' There are many layers to the

Excellence is a function which renders excellent the thing of which it is a function is Plato’s definition of virtue. What does this definition really mean though? Plato and Aristotle both had their own unique arguments devoted to the topic at hand, and their own ways of describing what virtue really is. Defining virtue may seem to be an easy taste, but to truly understand the arguments behind the definition can prove to be very challenging.

Plato was an Ancient Greek philosopher who lived between 428-432 B.C. He wrote mainly in dialogues, to stay true to how Socrates communicated philosophy. Plato displayed what is considered Socrates’ philosophy throughout the dialogue The Apology. In The Republic, Socrates is mainly used as a mouthpiece to communicate Plato’s philosophy. Socrates follows a philosophy best explained as “I do not know”, whereas Plato tries to find the ultimate solution to philosophical problems. In this essay, I will argue how Socrates has the best philosophical approach compared to that of Plato.

Plato was the father of the “Utopian” idea in which several features were essential. He broke down the human soul in three parts; Desire spiritual and rational. Plato addresses the three features as being a key to the establishment of the perfect society. If every person counterweights with the whole of society and these features than society can understand each other and progress and work towards the advancement of the society. Aristotle takes the same concept but more clearly defines it and takes it to the next level that goes beyond the perfect state and allows its applications to influence the whole system rather that purely serve as its basis. Aristotle has a perfect society but is not as nearly exaggerated as that of a utopia. Aristotle takes a more lenient attitude in his philosophy in

Plato and Aristotle are philosophers that both have an idea of an ideal state but they have their differences. While there are benefits to each of their views on politics and society, there are also many negative things about their views. Some of their negative views were realistic at one point in time but few are the same in today 's society. Although I don 't fully agree with either philosopher, I would have to side with Aristotle overall.

Plato viewed justice as an order and duty of the soul, believing that philosophers were the only ones who held this justice. Thus Plato’s ideal form of government would have philosophers leading society, dubbed “the myth of the

Both Plato and Aristotle believed in the creator as the only perfect form or thought. They both discuss the need for intellect in order to grasp the world around us. Moreover, they both believe that anything other than the creator are imperfect ideas, forms, or copies. Aside from the noticeable similarities there are a few differences as well. Aristotle believes in more than intellect to arrive at the concept of the good.

In the various discussions of imitative art there has been a notable disagreement between two distinguished philosophers; Plato and Aristotle. Although it was Plato who first discussed the concept of imitative art, it is my belief that Aristotle was justified in his praise and admiration of imitative art, specifically, the tragic drama. In my discussion on the two philosophers’ dissertations I will begin with the ideas of Plato and his position and requirements for imitative art and its respected uses, after which I will discuss the ideas of Aristotle to show that the tragic

The Hellenic period witnessed the invention of different ideas of theory. During such moments, they were several individual philosophers at the end of Hellenic each of whom had diverse adherents that frequently spread out from the first line of reasoning of philosophers. One of the significant duties during the period in artistic or cultural productions is Plato’s Republic (Holladay, 2011). The Plato Republic has the earliest orderly treatment of the theory of political esteems. In any case, different savants amid the time of Hellenic incorporate Socrates alongside Aristotle. Conversely, the Hellenistic period witnessed philosophers that aimed at the reason instead of the mission for truth. Every one of the savants in Hellenistic time had

Plato believed that knowledge is the virtue, in and of itself. This means that to know the good is to do the good. For example, knowing the right thing to do will lead to one doing the right thing; this implied that virtue could be taught by teaching someone right from wrong, good from evil. Aristotle stated that knowing the good was not enough, that one had to choose to act in the proper manner and create the habit of doing good. This definition shows that Aristotelian ethics are practical, rather than the theoretical approach by

Plato, a Greek Philosopher, is known for his writings that impacted people in the Ancient Greek society. He was a free thinker and lived in a free city, Athens. He was taught by multiple teachers including Socrates who was frequently mentioned in his writings as the central character. Plato’s novel, The Republic, influenced the idea of government and shows his views on the world. Throughout his personal life, writings, and dialogues, Plato shows his value of knowledge and how each of his writings impacted the morals of people in the society.

Both ancient Philosphers had similar views and explanaitons on many different aspects of human life. When we look into their explainations on human nature, and creating a strong society we find that they both had a strikingly similar distrust of laws,merchants and neither favored a democratic self government. Both Plato and Confucious believed in "absolute moral truth" and in the possibilty that all humans could coexist together in peace and harmony. However, despite the fact that they did focus on the individual they did not neccisarily believe in individual rights in the modern sense but rather "individual duty". Similarly Plato and Confucious also shared the belief that only those who are "already virtuous could create a well-ordered,

Plato, one of the most influential philosophers of western culture, was born in Athens of aristocratic parents, and as a young man witnessed the defeat of his city-state, by the Spartans in the Peloponnesian War. Around the age of twenty-one, Plato became a follower of Socrates who is best known as a questioner of everything and everyone. Plato studied the Socrates style of teaching, otherwise known as the Socratic Method, involved asking questions until his students had arrived at their own understanding. After the devastating fall of Athens, Plato’s teacher Socrates, was accused of corrupting the youth of Athens and was sentenced to death by his fellow citizens. The execution of Socrates left Plato so resentful that he left Athens to travel and study in other parts of the world. He later returned to Athens, and “it was during this period, 387-360 B.C., that he composed The Republic,” in which he outlined the nature of the just man and the ideal state (Plato, 1). One might wonder how a society based on this outline might function, and what it may look like: So I will build upon the ideas of Plato by demonstrating a society with socio-political organization with The Republic as a guide.

His standpoints can usually be opposed to Plato’s, as the two base their philosophy on different fundamentals. Raphael’s famous painting; “the School of Athens”, depicts this difference essentially: Plato points upwards, whereas Aristotle points downwards. Simply said, Aristotle places the emphasis on the world around us, whereas Plato does not. Even though Aristotle was Plato’s pupil, he never followed slavishly in his foot steps. This essay is meant to discover these differences in the context of their similarities in thought and investigate Aristotle’s critique on Plato. The two

Both of their philosophies were not necessarily immediately respected. Because of the speed that information traveled back then, it was not until the medieval period where other philosophers began to really look into Plato and Aristotle. The first early thinker that falls under that presupposition was St. Augustine. His view of ethics and logic was filled with inferences back to Aristotle. Specifically, transubstantiation was created based upon Aristotle’s beliefs. Another follower of Aristotle’s was Boethius and he wrote On the Consolation of Philosophy, which describes how humans can overcome tribulations by looking within and meditating. On the other side, Plotinus