While each of the readings by Whitehead, Bloom, Dickens, Plato, and Fuller, offer very thorough and nuanced perspectives on varying matters, one common thread that strings them all together is the notion of apprehension to change; regardless of context, it is simply human nature for us to cling stiffly onto what we know and are comfortable with – or at least what we think we know and are comfortable with. The most overt example of this being Plato’s cave allegory, in which the prisoners are too caught up in their own conviction to even fathom the notion of leaving the cave. Although not quite as blatant as the cave example, this very same premise is encapsulated in the rest of the readings as well, only manifesting themselves in differing contexts. In the instance of Plato’s cave allegory, the scenery associated with prisoners shackled to a cave has a very oppressive connotation to it; despite this, within the cave is ironically where many of the prisoners feel the greatest sense of solace. All symbolic implications aside, this scene does make very much logical sense simply because the cave is all that the prisoner’s have known for their whole lives. From an outsider’s perspective, it is easy for us to write off those involved in this situation as pitifully ignorant. However, there are undoubtedly moments in all of our lives in which we are the ones adamant that staying shackled to a cave is where we belong. While this metaphor can be applied to a plethora of different
While interpreting Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave’’ in which is a representation that described a narrative of the society of people in before Christ years. I realized how there was a major comparison of people in today’s society that reflected the same prisoner traits as the prisoners that were described in the dialogue. According to the Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave.” It described conditions of people chained at birth unable to function as independent individuals that were locked in a protracted dark cave. They were allowed to rotate their necks but could not stand up unless told to or leave the cave. Within this cave they could only watch a wall showing flash images and objects as if the prisoners were watching a play or movies at a theater. They believed that the pictures shown on the wall were factual in which they were just shadows of objects that were behind them. The objects reflected forms and puppet that were placed up by puppeteers to create shadows on the wall. The prisoners were unable to see the puppeteers and seemed as if they were watching a puppet show in the dark.
The metaphor behind Plato's "allegory of the cave" is simple: comfort causes ignorance. In the story, the prisoners have been held captive in the cave their entire lives. In only being able to view the shadows made by the puppeteers, the prisons have accepted this as reality. They have found comfort in this "reality" and refuse to accept the outside world causing ignorance. The allegory and the metaphor behind it can be found in all aspects of our lives. When we leave high school and head off to college or begin our lives, we must move away from relying on others or be left behind in the state of kidulthood. History also speaks on this metaphor in the case of Galileo. Galileo found evidence that contrary to popular belief the earth is not
After the prisoner has gained new found knowledge, he feels pity for those who are still imprisoned and unaware of the world around them. He knows now that their skills and perceptions are useless in the real world. Plato says “…when he remembered his old habitation, and the wisdom of the den and his fellow prisoners, do you not suppose that he would felicitate himself on the change, and pity them?” (p. 3). It is unfortunate that most people are unable to leave the cave. However, those who do have the privilege of learning the truth have an obligation to go back and share with those who remain in darkness - to share with them as much truth as they are capable of understanding. “…before his eyes had become steady would he not be ridiculous? Men would say of him that up he
This essay shows how the Allegory of the Cave is relevant today in the modern life. We live in a cave in which we have to break from in order to gain more wisdom, knowledge and enlightenment. Breaking from the cave changes one’s perception of the world and enhances freedom and exuberance. Through the steps portrayed by Plato, one can achieve
The whole point of the allegory is to represent to journey to enlightenment. The prisoners represent either the unenlightened that have not had enough experience to gain great wisdom or the uneducated that have not learned enough to gain great intelligence. And being thrown out of the cave into the outside world represents the process of becoming enlightened. Once enlightened they would of course not want to leave and to make them go back into the Cave would be cruel, as is noted by Glaucon. But as is explained they must be made to descend again among the prisoners in the den, and partake of their labors and honors, whether they are worth having or not” (873). Plato claims that these enlightened have a moral responsibility to bring their wisdom to the common people in order to help them learn more so everyone can benefit from the knowledge of an individual. This is certainly an agreeable prospect and one that is not seen enough in the real world. Once
The metaphor behind Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" is simple isolation causes ignorance. In the story, the prisoners have been held captive their entire lives. Through only being ab;e to view the flickering images made on the wall by puppeteers they believe these are in fact reality and are not willing to accept anything else causing ignorance towards the outside world. The allegory can be found all throughout history and present day. An example of this in the past is when humans believed the earth was flat and if they were to travel towards the edge they would fall off. Once Galileo claimed the earth was round the catholic church excommunicated him because they refused to acknowledge anything but the bible and have their comfort shifted.
WHY DOES PLATO COMPARE ORDINARY HUMAN EXISTENCE TO THAT OF CHAINED PRISONERS IN A CAVE?
The second stage of the Allegory of the Cave consists of the process leading up to enlightenment. Plato represents the difficulties of leaving a comfortable reality where you are content with your own ideas by comparing it to the harshness of a flickering flame. The bright light of the fire that you are newly being exposed to after being held in the dark for so long can be painful, and hard to cope with or understand. The journey from ignorance to a better understanding can be confusing. As humans, we naturally don’t want to be forced to question our own ideas and the things we know to be true, but it is this uncomfortable, driving force that can lead us out of our own contentment and onto the path of better understanding. Plato so eloquently describes this challenging journey by comparing it to that of a prisoner being forced to visually take in all of this new information that he had not previously been exposed to. It takes a great deal of strength to be able to challenge the world around you and develop your own ideas, rather than taking everything around you in on a surface value.
In the story, “Allegory of the cave,” by Plato, it explains how there were human beings living in a cave chained up facing the wall since they were children. As they grew older all they were able to see were the shadows of people crossing animals, tools, statues etc. on a bridge behind them. Since they could not turn their heads to look, their mind couldn't wrap around what they were really looking at. As if they weren't looking into reality. They had no knowledge of the outside world what so ever. This passage focuses more on justice, truth, and beauty. When a prisoner is released into the real world, the concept of reality is disorienting. The way we can reflect off this in the new world and society today, is the fact that most people are
One of Plato’s more famous writings, The Allegory of the Cave, Plato outlines the story of a man who breaks free of his constraints and comes to learn of new ideas and levels of thought that exist outside of the human level of thinking. However, after having learned so many new concepts, he returns to his fellow beings and attempts to reveal his findings but is rejected and threatened with death. This dialogue is an apparent reference to his teacher’s theories in philosophy and his ultimate demise for his beliefs but is also a relation to the theory of the Divided Line. This essay will analyze major points in The Allegory of the Cave and see how it relates to the Theory of the Divided Line. Also, this
We first learn about Plato’s cave in book seven of the Republic. In his book, Plato describes a conversation he has with Socrates. He tells Socrates the story of some men who had lived their entire lives in a cave. These men knew nothing beyond what they could see on the cave wall. One day, a man is freed. At first he rejected his new found knowledge of the world but, once he accepted what he learned outside of the cave, he could never go back to his sheltered existence. The cave is an allegory, a story that has a hidden meaning. Plato is attempting to describe the difference between conventional opinion and getting educated. Plato says “compare the effect of education and of the lack of it” (Plato 175).
Plato’s philosophy is that most people are happy in a world of shadows, whereas, Sagan claims that people are “highly motivated to find truth.” Although both Sagan and Plato make excellent points for their case, Plato’s view of humans’ quests for the truth makes a better case. “The Cave” can easily be compared to daily dealings with people might view as ignorant. When it comes to religion, politics, and science, there is always a debate with opposing views. Each person involved believes they are superior to the opposition. Plato discusses this towards the end, when the freed man reenters the cave with eyes that are blinded because they had gotten used to the sun. The freed man represents someone who has realized something other than what they were told. When the freed man tells the prisoners about what he saw out of the cave, he is ridiculed. Their argument for refusing to get released to enter to outside world is “Would they not let him know that he had gone up but only in order to come back down into the cave with his eyes ruined -- and thus it certainly does not pay to go up.” (Plato 517 a7) The prisoners are fine with staying in the cave because that’s all they know and they are happy with it. In life, this can be seen as people who refuse to think other than what they are taught, as they prefer to stay in a bubble or “cave.”
Imprisonment, while less influenced than the others is influenced nonetheless. It is shown when the prisoner who is freed. The prisoner is representing someone incarcerated being released after serving a sentence. They are shown a better way of living when released. They want to share his experience and wants to help show other prisoners a better way than going back to old habits. But the prisoners in the cave are so used to what they were taught to do and not do differently, it is all they know, different scares them. In the story Plato says that “don’t you think he would consider himself lucky because of the transformation that had happened and, by contrast, feel sorry for them.”. He’s saying that anyone else would just leave and not share their experience, but this prisoner did.
Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” and the ideas behind it are still relevant today. At some point in our lives, we can find ourselves to be trapped inside the cave; perceiving our surroundings or beliefs to be false due to lack of experience or knowledge. In my own life, I can reflect upon where I was once trapped in the cave and eventually became exposed to the harsher reality of the world around me. My ideas and perception of society were once innocent but after my experience in a public high school, my perception had changed dramatically.
A person considering living the examined life might face several obstacles, such as disagreement, opposition from other people. If a person questions common beliefs of his or her neighborhood, people surrounding him or her might feel betrayed and turn away or they may even become a threat to the person who is making new discoveries and wants to share them with society. Plato shows that in the “Allegory of The Cave” when the prisoner comes back to the cave to let others know what he has found in the outside world. In the text Plato writes “would he not provoke laughter, and would it not be said of him that he had returned from his journey aloft with his eyes ruined and that it was not work while even to attempt the ascent? And if it were possible to lay hands on and kill the man who tried to release them and lead them up, would they not kill him? They certainly would, he said” (Allegory 517 a), the other prisoners found the man questioning their ideas as wrong and considered him as a risk to their environment. They [the prisoners] would kill him if he tried to free them and take them out of the comfort of familiar surroundings. The chained prisoners represent people around us who are not willing to change nor have an open mind towards new information, they are very skeptical and