Plato's Clever Butcher

organizing the body of the speech; more specifically, the use of main points, supporting points,

If learning how to successfully convey your point in a disagreement is a subject of interest, Jay Heinrichs wrote this for you. The author of Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach us About The Art of Persuasion, Jay Heinrichs, is a speaker and persuasion context strategist, as well as an author. He has had his book published in 12 languages, used in more than 3,000 college courses and is one of the top 10 books assigned at Harvard, all according to his business website. This book covers specific tools and skills required for an adequate argument using his personal experiences and examples and thorough explanations.

His only interest is what will solve the issue for the audience. Make the audience believe that you are selfless. While arguing, act as if the conclusion happened upon. The persuader should express that what he is doing for the audience does harm to him. It also helps to show doubt in your own rhetorical ability, become the underdog.

I also prepared my arguments beforehand. I then supported each of my claims or claims by solid arguments based on factual and objective.

In life, people are guided by moral beliefs and principles. Whether their beliefs are good or bad, their decisions are based on them. In Plato “The Crito”, Socrates emphasizes his moral beliefs and principles when he decides not to escape from prison. Although Socrates had the opportunity to escape his death sentence, he chose not to do so because he had a moral obligation to commit a sacrifice.

Introduce the first main point of the argument. Then, provide evidence from the sources. Multiple pieces of evidence should be provided to support the main point.

• 2) the narration would offer background material on the case at hand • 3) the partition would divide the case and make clear which part or parts the speaker was going to address, which parts the speaker would not take up and what order would be followed in the development • 4) the confirmation would offer points to substantiate the argument and provide reasons, details, illustrations, and examples in support • 5) the refutation would consider possible objections to the argument and try to counter these • 6) the peroration would draw together the entire argument and include material designed to compel the audience to think or act in a way related to the central argument

and the audience, and secondly, by speaking in an active voice to let the sophisticated audience know of the importance that his argument brings.

In using facts, studies and reason to persuade the audience,

As previously mentioned, you must listen, but in a specific way. As someone speaks, carefully consider what is being spoken, and especially, if you’re in a debate setting, listen for any sources from which they derive their information. What you may find is that people generally hold beliefs and opinions with few or weak arguments in their favor.

What was the Structure for this speech? In this speech he told his journey of his life in order of events. There are three main organizational pattern speeches: Topical Division, Chronological Division, and Spatial Division.Topical Division is a common one used its seems to be easier to write for your speech. Topical Division is when you create categories related to your topic (Public speaking and presentations, 49).Chronological Division is organize information in a time sequence (Public speaking and presentations, 48). Spatial Division is describe things according to their physical positioning (Public speaking and presentations, 49). This speech Steve jobs presented give more of a topical pattern standpoint. My reason for stating this is

The College Composition and Communication journal published the article titled “Identifying and Teaching Rhetorical Plans for Arrangement” by JoAnne and Leonard Podis which provides methods that students can utilize to arrange writing pieces. The authors explain that the structure of the writing can influence the readers’ retention and understanding of the information and the arrangement of the text can improve the text readability. The article then lists the different plans of arrangements which are “obvious before remarkable”, “presentation before refutation”, “explanation before complication”, solvable before unsolvable”, “agreement before disagreement”, “literal before symbolic”,

In Plato’s life of a tyrant he is talking about the tyrannical man and how he evolves from a democratic one and what becomes of him once he starts to exist. He goes into talking about how the how he is ruled by his desires to do bad criminal things. Plat says they are the awake when everyone else is sleep. A person who will commit a foul murder, doesn’t let that fact that what he is doing is shameful stop him from doing so. He is saying that the tyrant is bad and does every kind of shameless thing even with his family trying to win him back but being disgraceful and rebellious so to speak is winning. Is the tyrant happy?No, Plato thinks that this type of life is ratchet, that can’t trust anyone and has no friends and is living is fear. This

When doing this presentation, I find myself using rhetorical situation a lot. Once all the information was collected, I would take a piece of information and

Aristotle was amongst the first known philosophers to examine morality and conduct. In fact, his approach and perspective towards ethical practice and happiness was perhaps the most influential moral philosophy up until perhaps Immanuel Kant. As such, Aristotle’s moral philosophical approach can be used to examine and understand ethical practices and behaviors. The particular ethical practice that will be examined in this essay will be that of Paul Wagner, the fictional character featured in Larissa Macfarquhar’s The Kindest Cut . Through an analysis of Aristotelian and Kantian ethics and Wagner’s behavior, this essay will seek to identify and understand the moral worth of Wagner’s actions. First however, a concise and relevant summary of