Plauchut's Cavite Mutiny

The initial impulse of the French revolution was destructive. For those who lived through all, or even part, of these vast upheavals, the shock was overwhelming. Maximilien Robespierre was a proud disciple of the enlightenment and declared that no political writer had foreseen this revolution. Robespierre (1758-1794) was one of the leaders of the Committee of Public Safety, the effective governing body of France during the most radical phase of the revolution. The leaders of this revolution attempted, perhaps more than any other revolutionary leaders before or since, to totally transform human society in every way. (Supreme Being) Although Robespierre began with patriotic intent he still was the face of the Reign of Terror and was viewed as being a radical person.

Throughout history, rebellions and revolutions shaped societies and created better conditions for the people of those societies. The Taiping Rebellion and the French Revolution successfully shaped their societies by means of political and social reforms. They were both influenced to later achieve their unique successes because of a multitude of pushing factors, such as the existing social and political conditions of China and France. Natural disasters, breaking away from tradition, and China 's loss in the Opium War contributed to the ideology of the Taiping Rebellion; to restore China to its previous greatness and overthrowing the government. Likewise in France the conditions were not any better. Hunger and poverty were rampant in the cities of France. Bankruptcy and a corrupt government only made things worst. These conditions set the foundation for the ideology of the French Revolution; acquiring liberty, equality, and fraternity. Together, each of these societies found their successes in different ways. France created major changes in the government and legal system which were more immediate and apparent than in China, where they achieved successes that took longer to become apparent, and is viewed as more effective in a long term point of view.

In 1858 the event known as the Sepoy Rebellion started on May 10 1857 and ended in the 1 of November 1858. The uprising was against the British East India Company and led by the Sepoy’s due to rumors being spread that the grease being used to load the guns were pig or cow fat. This outraged the Citizens of India and caused the fight against the British East India Company’s hold on India. The British East India Company’s grip on India was a perfect example of British Imperialism. British imperialism was different from imperialism as the British instead of just taking over their government and economy, they gave these countries education in the ways of the west. The British imperialized India, Southeast Asia, and Africa. The first British people

The eighteenth century revolutions predate the Marxist framework which would ultimately changed the way in which revolutions are understood; as highly participatory mass-moments which sought to change some kind of social order. Gordon Wood acknowledges this as he states; “The social distinctions and economic deprivations that we today think of as the consequences of class divisions…were in the eighteenth century usually thought to be caused by abuses in government.” Skocpol also acknowledges the difference between modern and what the “liberal revolutions” of the eighteenth century. She writes that all revolutions that occur within the modern capitalist systems accomplish nothing but a more concentrated and centralized state bureaucracy. However Skocpol’s analysis takes a retrospective structuralist approach to understanding these eighteenth century social revolutions. Her analysis does not rely on the deprivation hypothesis nor any kind of ideology, but instead highlights the importance of the “revolutionary moment” where elites and peasants unite (through an “equal powers” negotiation) against the state (Stevens 10/16/17). By applying Skocpol’s model to the French, Haitian, and American Revolutions, we can see how well it holds up when applied to these various intertwined 18th century revolutions despite their drastically different outcomes.

From 1524 to 1526 peasant revolts were occurring throughout the German states. Many causes and responses brewed out of these revolts. One cause is from religion issues (1,3,6) , Luther’s idea of equality. Another cause is the peasant gaining power (2,8,9). As a result of these causes came out response, the most common response was riots and chaos (5,11,7). These revolts would end in thousands of rebel deaths and others are also killed.

As our discussion post provided this week, the colonists responded with rebellion because of the new acts that were imposed upon them by the British (Schultz, K., 2013). Their attempt to reform the American colonies contributed to the growth of the Revolutionary movement because the British tried to enforce stricter policies and laws (Schultz, K. M., 2013). The British wanted to tighten the policies over the colonial officials so that it would reduce the corruption, the British wanted control over the area of land that the settlers occupied, and they wanted to raise revenue by taxing goods. Although the British were adamant about their purpose, the colonist believed that rebelling against them would help in receiving their independence.

Slavery was a part of life in the 1800s. Many northerners were opposed to the idea, and this led to the civil war. However, plantation owners had no intention of giving up their slaves in the early 1800s. A slave’s life consisted of white owners, work, and whippings. This oppression eventually led to outbreaks like Nat Turner's rebellion and Gabriel’s conspiracy. The German Coast Uprising was the biggest of these slave revolts.

In 1789, an event would take place that would shake a nation. This event further altered the country of France’s history and drastically changed its future. This event was known as the Storming of the Bastille, the first violent instance to instigate the French Revolution and the formation of a rebel alliance to overthrow French monarchy. However the motives of the renegades is far and wide. The question must be asked; What were the major reasons for the French Revolution? Many elements of France’s infrastructure were created to suppress the qualms of the people. However, the major influences that caused the French Revolution were the new ideas of the enlightened thinkers, powerlessness of the Third Estate, and famine crises. Without these factors within French society, a governmental collapse may not have occurred.

The British colonialism in India started in the 19th century and ended in 1947, after the Mughal Empire and the Aurangzeb (that controlled India at that time) collapsed. One of the reasons for colonizing India was trade, due to India’s great amount of raw materials. This colonization caused many negative and positive consequences. The British treatment to the Indians was derogatory, consequently, the Sepoy rebellion started.

There are many lasting impacts of the rebellions of Upper and Lower Canada that are even present today 200 years later. First is that Canada has a democratic government. During the rebellions, Canadians could elect representatives but the representatives had very little power. The government didn’t care about the thoughts of the common person. Today the people cast votes for the Prime Minister instead of it already being decided by a counsel of rich people. He cares about people’s opinions and tries to appeal to them to win office. Another way Canada has been influenced is we are one country and are multicultural. Back in 1837 Canada was divided into two parts the French-speaking

In the past history, the North West faced serious problems. The North West was a time of displeasure. Land titles were not respected and followers weren't fulfilled and decisions needed to be heard.

Treblinka was a german work camp during the holocaust, jews sent there were not to come back they would work in gravel pits until they couldn't any longer. They were then sent to treblinka II,a death camp complete with a furnace designed for jews. Many died in treblinka over 900,000 jews were sent to treblinka, leading to about 900,000 deaths. Through treblinka's terror rain, only about 63 jews survived. Treblinka was one of the worst chapters of the holocaust many thousands died in this near unimaginable way.

CHris is feeling like his empire is blowing up around him and in the rubble his is former glory. But he survived this explosion and only thing he can see is destruction from having no power to stop it. He feel like his power is being stolen from him and need to get it back somehow. This is why he want to end the rebel movement so that won't happen for real. This is making him scared of Ned's military and the growing threat of the superpower the peewee tigers military. TO him both of those issue combined is making him feel like his days as king are numbered. HE think the rebel movement will destroy his kingdom like they dropped a nuclear bomb on the whole kingdom. HE also think Ned is a good representation of the rebel movement. They are

Throughout the years many historians have compilated and examined why Indian people were so desperate to gain back their independence from the British Empire during their rule over India, from 1612 to 1947. The reasoning can most definitely be found as the British discriminated against Indian people as they believe that they were inferior; it is no surprise that Indian people fought so hard for their independence. Throughout the British Raj, they placed and put forward unbelievably racist acts and laws which discriminated against Indian people. Which of course led to Indians to rebel against the British rule and which the British reacted with causing massacres. Explaining the nationalistic many India’s felt during the British Raj.

The drawing of narrative inferences by the reader is very important to interpret the work well. However, the author, while writing a story, can treat some incidents in detail and barely mention or even omit others. He may distort these incidents, may not observe chronological sequence, he can use messengers or flashbacks, and so on and so forth. The function of resorting to these varied narrative techniques is to emphasize or de-emphasize certain story-events, to interpret some and to leave others to inference, to show or to tell, to comment or to remain silent, to focus on this or that aspect of an event or character. The use of the unreliable is a very important and unconventional narrative technique used by authors in