Plenitude Case

After having a very successful performance and getting second place on the first Littlefield simulation game we knew what we needed to do to win the second simulation game. We were very eager to outperform our competition and we almost did so, but ended up in second place again with a cash balance of $2,660,393.

And the customer are sensitive to the price since those products are using only few times and need to be change all the time.

When it comes to pricing we always strived to provide one of the lowest prices in the market. We decreased product prices by $0.50 on each product each year to appeal to consumers. Since providing a low cost product was one of our strategic goals we did not stray from decreasing prices. Looking back, perhaps we shouldn’t have been so loyal to our strategy when we were unable to turn a profit. While a strategy is important to stick to, being a profitable company is the ultimate goal.

Hearst and the business team have three options, on one hand a line extension or new product positioned against Plax could be introduced into the market and in the other hand doing nothing and just looking at claims other than “breath” instead of adding a new product. Launching a new product “new pre-brushing rinse,” for example would cannibalize a part of Scope sales, also the delivery, marketing and capital costs of P&G will increase if a new rinse was launched and the user of Scope would be confused since he/she saw in the old scope a breath refreshment, taking into consideration that the new rinse is not any better than Plax in reducing plaque, but at the same time it may increase the market share of P&G and increase its profit. Whereas adding a new claim for Scope would not increase the volume of sales, but it could prevent current users of Scope to switch and it would stabilize the

Our team decided to choose the “Broad Differentiation” strategy as the basic strategy for our company. We will attempt to differentiate our product line in several distinct dimensions. By providing products that are vastly superior and unique from our competitors and pricing the products with an affordable price, we can gain something that is beneficial for the company in the future, which is customers’ loyalty and awareness. We may change or modify our strategy for the next round depending how it performs against our competitors.

Soren Chemical is new to developing a consumer brand (it partners with formulators to use private-label branding for its Kailan MW line). Therefore, they are relatively inexperienced with marketing consumer-oriented brands whereby they have to handle directly with wholesalers and also market to retailers, pool service professionals and consumers. This inexperience might have caused miscommunication between channels as seen when pool service professionals and specialty retailers had made inquires about Coracle but only 30% recalled receiving the Coracle material. Also 70% of them stated that Coracle

By reducing the price, Jones Blair will be more competitive with other brands. Right now, Jones Blair is prices significantly higher than all other brands and when a consumer sees the brands side by side at a store, they may not realize the higher quality of Jones Blair paint, just the higher price and immediately select against.

It is highly recognized in the market especially among teenagers. Traditional acne products are low price range and kind of old fashioned in terms of designation and package, which catches lower income and function oriented customers. Since the main ingredients are not a secret, other popular cosmetic brands can also develop similar products. L’Oreal Launched “Acne Response” new Adult Acne Product, treats acne with gentle formula of 1% salicylic acid and 2.55% benzoyl peroxide, retail Price of $24.99 vs. $39.99 for Proactiv, which soon caught big market share and attracted some of the loose proactive customers. New producers claim that it is the ingredient which matters, not the expensive celebrity commercials. With proper marketing strategy, it won’t be hard for them to share cups from Proactiv. Other competition came from Natural skin care products. Some biological cosmetic products with aloe vera, green tea, passion flower, or Gotu kola are claimed to work well to cure acne and skin bacteria. They are natural and green with less side effect and damage to skin. However, not every company can afford the heavy input in advertising. As the first modern acne prevention and treatment product shown in the market, Proactiv will still lead the market and enjoy the competitive advantage for years.

Two potential solutions were proposed at the Marketing and Operations Council meeting. Rita Sanchez, the sales lead, suggests a reduction in the price of current products by 40-50% or introducing a new lower-market brand reaching value consumers in order to quickly sell the excess inventory. Jim Hargrove, the Marketing Directory, strongly disagreed with either scenario arguing they would permanently tarnish the brand’s premium quality image. A fourth alternative could be to introduce a new premium line while dropping the price of the Gold line to maintain brand image.

As mentioned previously, NASA faces a serious problem regarding to the product transfer to EROW. For

The team gathered a wealth of information about the products strengths and weaknesses, but lacked important consumer­brand relationship information. Supplementing the Consumer Insight Team research with the Usage and Attitude Study provided a well rounded customer understanding.

After analyzing the results from the previous quarter, it was determined that the prices set for each segment were not sufficient. Product sales priority were also not properly adjusted. With the R&D investments, sales priorities needed to be changed for the main focus to become the most profitable market segments. Prices were not competitive which in turned decreased revenue, market share, and profitability. To become more competitive we altered the prices in each market segment. The Workhorse product was the first to change, the price was lowered to $2500 in an attempt to increase sales; at this price Team 4 was still making a profit on this product, as well as making the price much more competitive. The Workhorse sales priority was also lowered to 3rd in Americas and 4th in APAC and EMEA. This product was not selling as well as we had hoped, and was no longer as profitable as it once was which led to this decision. Next, the Innovator product’s price was adjusted; this involved a price increase to $4100. This price was adjusted to include the new

The quest for beauty is an endless endeavour at all times. Despite the old saying cautioning us that beauty is only skin deep, billions of dollars is spent on skin care products every year for men and women, young and old alike. In this multi-million-dollar industry, every company tries hard to maximize their profit. One of the most common methods they apply is market segmentation.

L'Oreal is a cosmetic company, which makes some of the world's biggest beauty products. L'Oreal's success story begins in 1907. It has been the market leader in the cosmetics and toiletries market since 2001 (Euromonitor 2005). Their products are sold in about one hundred and thirty countries worldwide. L'Oreal is divided into four categories - consumer products, professional products, luxury products, active cosmetics. They mainly focus on skin care, make-up, hair care and fragrance. L'Oreal includes some important brands such as Lancôme Paris, Garnier, Mabelline, Softsheen Carson, Matrix, and Biotherm. L'Oreal invests heavily into its research and development which gives them competitive advantage over its competitors.

Although consumers noticed it but decided to go along with it as far as the company does not tingles with prices.