Poland 's Revoked Voting Rights

Russia and Germany's Non-Aggression Pact led to Russian control of half of Poland. When WWII ended, Russia was still in control of Poland, and communism spread throughout Europe.

Congress major changes to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in 1970, 1975, 1982, 1992, and 2006.

Before World War II, Soviet troops occupied most of Eastern Europe. Stalin promised to hold “free elections” in these Eastern European nations. Later he broke that promise. By 1948, Communists controlled the governments of every Eastern country except Yugoslavia. In each country the Soviets placed dictators.

When identifying the presence of a democratic deficit in the European Union, it is important to consider a range of factors, including international treaties and the effect they had on its structured governmental framework. One of the first official agreements established by the European Union (formerly

The consciousness of democracy and decentralization grow in people’s mind and formed various kind of country during the history of human. The UK evolves about thousands years and become a constitutional monarchy country with nowadays appearance. The Europe suffered first and second war and others conflicts between European countries, to prevent further war occur in Europe European Union were built. In the last about sixty years the EU shows it’s potential and has the second largest parliament in the world with multiple member countries. The essay mainly focus on discuss the differences between UK parliament and European Parliament, statistics, government act, declaration and treaties will be given in order to support the opinions. Firstly, the origin and developments of the two parliaments will be given. Secondly, the essay will compare the two parliaments from aspects of structure, composition, function and role. Thirdly, a clear definition of power and ability between UK parliament and EU parliament will be illustrated. Then, the ability of parliament hold executive to account will be discussed. Ultimately, there will be conclusion to brief review the gist of this essay.

After World War II the Soviet Union led by Stalin maintained a strong presence and influence in Central and Eastern Europe, specifically, Poland through the communist Polish United Workers’ Party (PZPR). In this paper I aim to address the reason why communism and Marxist ideologies were unsuccessfully received in post war Poland. I will be arguing *that Marxism was made into a tool of oppression by the Soviet Union, and therefore became illegitimate in itself. I intend on arguing this theory by investigating the goal of the Soviet Union. In addition to this I will identifying instances where the Soviets and communist puppet parties in Poland had strayed from traditional Marxist ideologies. Finally I will recognize the opposition groups and parties that had formed against the Soviet oppression and instillment of inequality.

With regards to the claim that the European Parliament is too weak (the second of Weiler's standard version claims), Moravcsik (2002; 2003) emphasises the fact that during the last twenty years, the European Parliament is the institution which have experienced the most reforms, regarding its increase of powers, compare to the Council and the Commission. The latter argument is in fact accurate because ever since the Single European Act (1986), the European Parliament gains more and more power by reforms in every signed Treaty (Moravcsik, 2003, p. 7). Despite that, however, the Parliament is still considered to be weak compared to the other institutions, as it will be analysed later in the essay.

Russia and Poland were once under the single party control, communism. Communism is when the government owns nearly all aspects of society. The government controlled everything from means of production, property, to even media. The fall of communism throughout the world began in the late 1980s. Since the liberalization of the two countries, Russia and Poland have come to long ways. After independence, both countries faced many struggles but are now considered to be powerful middle-class nations today.

Term- Democracy- After Poland finally gained independence, their goal was to have a democracy. They ran a democracy until Pilsudski seized power in 1923.

The communist system was a flop. The economy collapsed and the soviets went into a severe depression. People in Russia were starving to death. The military spending was priority and there was no oil left for the people to burn. As a result, people were freezing to death in the harsh winter. The people revolted in Russia and communism collapsed. Poland kept communism until the 1990's ( ) until the government was pressured by the Catholic Church to leave communism and return to the republic government. The church was free again but the government did not allow them to become as powerful

Further, the Commission’s institutional structure is a factor putting great weight on perceptions of the democratic deficit since it lacks democratic credentials yet largely dominates EU law-making in spite of the presence of the EP as its democratic face. Commissioners are not elected, directly nor indirectly, as is with most sovereign executives. Follesdal and Hix however argue that the exercise of these executive powers requires contestation of political leadership and policy. They also suggest that direct elections by citizens or national parliaments should be allowed for the contestation of the Commission President who holds the most powerful EU executive position, so as to increase democratic input. Contrary to this position is that of Moravcsik, who discounts the idea of elections as a possible remedy and rejects the notion of

Poland’s President, instead of pushing back against attacks on democracy, is acting as a puppet for Kaczynski, the Law and Justice party, and its plans to strip away the checks and balances of government. Despite a doctorate in law, Duda has violated the constitution multiple times, signing bills into law that threaten the Polish government’s credibility. Such ignorance, or perhaps purposeful lawbreaking provides a bit of ominous foreshadowing for the framework of Polish society.

In this assignment I will be assessing the democratic accountability of the European Union. I will begin by briefly describing the institutions, their functions, compositions and discuss how they work as check and balance system to ensure democratic accountability further to look on to how laws are made and what they are In order to establish whether or not the EU is in fact answerable to its citizens.

The European Union (EU) is fundamentally democratic and is evident through its institutions, however, the current democratic electoral structure is of great concern. The EU is a new type of political system, often referred to as a sui generis, implying its uniqueness as there exists and a non comparable political body. The EU can neither regarded as a ‘state’ nor as an ‘international institution’ as it combines supranational as well as intergovernmental characteristics (Hix, 1999, p7). In this regard it has developed its own understandings of what democracy is. It is evident that the development of and spread of democracy is a central concept and foundation to all politics within the EU, and remains focuses on makings its governing

This paper will assess the claim that supremacy of EU law is still an evolving and debatable concept. To do this, I have divided this paper into four sections. The first section will discuss the establishment of supremacy in EU law through ECJ case law. The second section will explore the vibrant debate surrounding constitutional pluralism that has arisen since the early 1990s. The third section will examine the debate and impact of the codification of primacy in the early 2000s. The fourth section will examine the extent to which the principle of sovereignty has been accepted in three EU Member States, namely, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Poland.