Police Bill 317

Over the last few years there has been much controversy leading up to the need for law enforcement officers to wear body cameras. This is not only for citizens but also for the officers’ protection. With so much debate regarding police brutality and excessive force body cameras are quickly on the rise. New technology is giving police on a state and federal level a new opportunity to cut back on some of the allegations and negativity we have seen in the last few years. On the other hand it is giving citizens all over the country the safety they should feel when being approached by law enforcement. Our technology has improved significantly over the years and this seems to be something that will benefit everyone.

This is a website created by the Department of Labor which offers information on the salary and outlook of this profession. This website also provides the requirements of a police officer. The website also offers information on the duties preformed. I will be able to use this source to answer the questions regarding the requirements and compensation of police

Law enforcement officers are a part of our communities to protect and serve us from danger and to apprehend criminals that disobey the law. It is their job to apprehend criminals and respond to calls from the people. Most enforcement officers have to stay in their designated areas, or jurisdiction, and respond to any calls or monitor the area. They are there to catch any

To peep or not to peep, that is the question being asked by many regarding police body cameras in communities. The topic of police brutality is a rising issue in today’s society. Several questions have arose over the use of police body cameras and whether they are a good or bad idea. Police body cameras have has a variety of concern to many communities regarding their potential. Every city has a different trust and relationship for their police force and these concerns vary depending on the community. People have the concern regarding privacy, protection, and impact on the community and more. After researching the problems caused by Police body cameras as well as its background, the current state of the issue, and the potential solutions, it is clear that communities need to bring a solution to this situation.Such as laws, policies, rules, and more to control this new information.

Across the country a growing number of legislative departments have been debating about the pros and cons of police body cameras. This paper will further explore benefits, as well as the downfalls of using such devices. This paper will also look at specific cases and examine whether or not body cameras were helpful in various situations. It will examine if they were a deterrent in cases dealing with police brutality and domestic violence. It also looks at how they could be misused and assisting some officers in covering up their corrupt behavior.

Just like any other career, before someone can join a police force, one must go through the academy first. Police training is fulfilled by a full-time academy, which normally takes about nineteen weeks. Because the Police Academy is required by the state of California, “you

First advantage in law enforcement agents wearing body cameras is to hold the officers accountable. “Holding the officers accountable, will ensure the officer adheres to policies and procedures during an encounter with victims and suspects.” Body-worn cameras are poised to help boost accountability for law enforcement and citizens and, unlike many new police technologies, the cameras share preliminary support from both law enforcement and social justice groups. Successful implementation of the cameras will require careful policies that respect and protect both the police and the public.

What many do not seem to realize is that a law enforcement agency is not a job, it is a career. One must truly be dedicated and determined to work in the field because it is all about your love for what you are doing.

Body cameras in policing are still new, but more and more agencies are beginning to implement this technology into their line of work. At first police officers were very hesitant to wear these body cameras because they were afraid they would infringe themselves and give away their own privacy. Later, as body cameras were beginning to see more use in the work place, officers began to realize that these very own body cameras that they once thought would only cause themselves harm would actual prove to be useful in a variety of situations. Some of these situations can be citizen complaints, to even backing up an officers use of force. Body cameras can be the one sole thing that can give

The Obama Administration announced on December 1st of 2014 that they would provide funding for 50,000 police body cameras. Not too long after this announcement, United States Senator Brian Schatz introduced bill number S. 877, the Police Body Camera Act. Many civil rights groups are anticipating with excitement the approval of this bill, while other organizations are pushing for it to be rejected. These civil rights groups believe that it will help place police accountable for their actions, create public trust and safety. On the other hand opposing groups believe it will be an invasion of privacy, be very costly and ineffective. These conflicting ideas have posed a question: Should the United States Senate approve bill S. 877, Police Camera Act?

Stories of presumed police misconduct have been surfacing in America in the last couple of years, sparking many debates and speculations on the true causes of these situations. Many blame the officers in these encounters, forcing them to face repercussions for crimes they did not commit. Alternatively, in some situations, the officer is guilty, but public outcries in favor of the police protect them from any consequences. Regardless of the situation, there is a great bias concerning law enforcement in this country. Recently, people have begun advocating for body cameras on police officers to provide the public with accurate records of all police encounters so that no false claims could be made against the officers. Body cameras on policemen should be necessary for the safety and comfort of our citizens, as well as for our officers, for regaining the public’s trust, and for maintaining an honest law enforcement system.

- Cops must complete a two year degree before they can be a certified officer.

You do not have to go to college to be a police officer, you don’t need any certificates to apply. However you do have to have a current Kansas Driver’s license, you must be at least 21 years of age, live in the city limits or a maximum of a 30 minute drive, have no felony or domestic convictions, must be a U.S. citizen, and if you’re a military veteran you must have been honorably discharged. Once you have met the requirements you apply, then go through a series of test and interviews. The series of interviews consist of aptitude test, physical test, Health examinations, oral boards, polygraphs, and legal tests. Those are all things that it takes to become a police officer in the city of

Depending on location a person wanting to join the field can find more or less K9 officers. For someone searching for a job the number of job opportunities can vary from year to year and from place to place(U.S “Detectives and Officers”).

Every law enforcement officer has to be between 21 and 28 years old; furthermore, their high has to be approximately 5’7”. If someone has been recruited from the armed forces and they have not reached the age of 31, then an exception is made (Terrill,