Police Crimes And Possession Of An Illegal Weapon

You're not gonna tell me you believe that phony story about losing the knife, and that business about being at the movies. Look, you know how these people lie! It's born in them! I mean what the heck? I don't even have to tell you. They don't know what the truth is! And lemme tell you, they don't need any real big reason to kill someone, either! No sir! [Juror 10, page 51] This type of prejudice offended many of the other jurors, especially Juror 5 who is of similar race to the accused.

my opinion there were 3 main jurors in the jury room: Juror 8, Juror 3 and Juror 9. Juror 8 is

The sixth amendment to the U.S constitution guarantees a defendant in a criminal prosecution the right to a speedy, public, and impartial trial by jury. Once it has determined that the trial will be by jury, the next step in the criminal proceeding is the selection of the jurors. During this process possible jurors receive a summons in the mall ordering them to appear in court at a specified time and date the people who are summoned comprise the venire (the prospective jurors for cases). Voir dire Latin term meaning to speak the truth, this is an examination conducted by the courts or by the attorneys of a potential juror or witness to determine if they would be proficient or qualified for services. Jurors’ questionnaires reveals information disqualifying them from jury service is only the first step in the jury selection process. Typical questions relate to whether prospective jurors know the defendant, the attorneys, or any of the witnesses, whether they have read or heard about the case in the media, and whether they have racial, nationality, or gender biases. Effective voir dire is getting the prospective jurors to tell the court or attorneys what they need to know( Ferdico, J 2005).

interpretation, as well as varying degrees of moderated success or lack thereof. For example, they open the chapter with a discussion of the fact that sociological experts in the Clinton administration had predicted a massive influx of gun-related crime within the coming years, stating that the percentage of teen homicides was subject to increase as much as fifteen percent over the course of the next decade. They then go on to admit that even these experts were unable to adequately predict the trend that occurred, in that several factors ensured the actual decrease of teen homicides over the course of those years. By 2003, as this chapter states, the number of gun-related murders in New York City had fallen to 596, as compared to 2,245 in 1990.

A group of researchers analyzed gun trace data to study the paths by which certain guns move from their original purchase to crime scenes in Boston. They found that more than half of the guns used in assaults and twenty eight percent of the rest of the guns were purchased from a licenced dealer. This has become a major issue. With the weak gun control that is currently issued in certain states, more and more people have access to guns. And when people have better access to guns, crime rates skyrocket.

One is considerd a B class violent felony, this is robbery in the First Degree. It is the most serious and violent type of robbery someone can commit. Sentencing laws are currently between five years and twenty five years. With the five year sentence, the criminal is only required to serve at the minimum, eighty five percent of their mandated sentence. Another form of armed robbery is robbery in the Second Degree, which is a class C violent felony. When it comes to violent robberies, this falls in second place. This specific type of robbery usually involves a group of people. The maximum prison sentence that a person can receive for this crime is fifteen years. In my opinion, I believe that when it comes to a C class felony, the length of the sentence should be given on a case by case basis. It seems to get a little tricky when it comes to what is considered a violent robbery. For instance, if a school yard bully beats up one child and takes another child’s lunch money, should that child receive a prison sentence for such a juvenile infraction? I believe that in no way should the child receive a prison sentence of any

Weapons Violations, Concealed Weapon - Carrying a Concealed Pistol: The MP report stated that the SM's POV was inspected by the MP's at a 100% vehicle search check point. A black BB gun pistol was discovered under the front passengers seat. The SM received a written letter of reprimand and placed in his local file.

The jury or jurors "are randomly drawn from the court's geographical area- typically from voter and motor vehicle registration lists-to evaluate evidence during trials and render verdicts. Jurors decide, according to the evidence, whether the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the charged crime. Jurors are not supposed to decide legal questions, such as what evidence is admissible. And jurors usually do not decide what sentence the defendant should receive in case of a conviction, except in capital punishment cases.

In America, the jury system works in the federal and state courts in criminal and civil procedures. The jurors are chosen randomly among citizens and they are conducted by the judge in every step of the trial. At this point, the rules of the game are clearly established. On one hand, the judge is responsible for choosing a jury properly and makes sure that the parties follow the rules of procedure. On the other hand, and in both procedures, the jury is responsible for the facts of the case. With this in mind, we are going to explain some advantages and disadvantages of the jury system to establish a conclusion according to our personal and juridical opinion.

Currently there are two different classes of armed robbery . One is considerd a B class violent felony ,this is robbery in the first degree.It is the most serious and violent type of robbery someone can commit. Sentencing laws are currently between five years and twenty five years. With the five year sentence the criminal is only reqiuired to complete eighty five percent of their time.

In Colorado robbery is defined as any person who knowingly takes anything of value from the person or presence of another by use of force, threats, or intimidation. If this is done it is marked as a class 4 felony, which is at least 2 years but no more than 6 followed by a 3 year mandatory parole period in Colorado. In Georgia’s definition, a person commits robbery when, with the intent to commit theft, he takes property of another from the person of the immediate presence of another. By use of force, by intimidation, use of threat or coercion, or by placing person in fear of immediate bodily injury to himself or another, or by sudden snatching. Their punishment in Georgia for robbery is no less than one nor more than 20 years imprisonment. So as you can see this is classified as substantive because they define the behavior subject to punishment by government, and they specify what the punishment will be for commitment of the offense in their own

On February 28, 1997, Larry Phillips, Jr. and Emil Mătăsăreanu armed with AK-47s entered Bank of America in North Hollywood in an attempt to rob it. Phillips had been in trouble with the police since his youth and had already spent 3 months in jail for illegal firearm possession. Mătăsăreanu acted as his loyal co conspirator. Not only were they wanted for armed robbery but also for murder, after killing a security guard in a heist in 1995. Armed with five machine gun, three handguns, as well as illegal 100 round drums. Parked in the north bank parking lot in a white 1987 Chevrolet Celebrity, the two set alarms for 8 minutes, the estimated time it would take police to arrive on scene, the pair also takes phenobarbital to help calm their

Guns are the most common weapons used in murder cases. And it is used to identify the murderer. Criminals can cover up most evidence but they often forget about the evidence left by the weapon itself. Starting in 1835 with a defect found in a bullet recovered from the victim and ballistic evidence has been useful ever since. In 1854 a wading of newspaper was found in the barrel of the weapon used and the newspaper was found in the suspects house.

In order to fulfill an individual’s constitutional right to a trial overseen by a jury of his or her peers, the process of juror selection is repeated every day in courtrooms around the country. The process is not only vital to the American justice system as a whole; for the prospective juror it is also a defining feature of their U.S. citizenship. Juror selection and the accompanying voir dire, when examined for more than its procedural parts, reveals itself to be more complex than a set of ordinary practices. The frameworks established by Emile Durkheim, Arnold Van Gennep, and Victor Turner help to separate the ritual elements present in jury duty from aspects that are more representative of “technological routine”.

A jury has been described as a convention of a sworn body of people with the aim of rendering an impartial verdict. These randomly selected twelve people are American citizens in the tax payers and voters databases. The right to a jury trial is a constitutional right available at the request of the parties, whether civil or criminal cases . The jury is known as the fact finder as it decides on the material issues of the case. After hearing facts from both sides and seeing evidence, the jury is instructed by the judge on applicable laws. The next step is the jury deliberation which leads to the final