preview

Police Force In Tom Hayden's Two, Many Columbia University Protests

Decent Essays

Columbia University was a place of great tension between students and university staff in 1968. Students, some as young as late teenagers, protested against the school with strikes and sit-ins, and the situation escalated to the point where the university chose to use the New York Police Department force the students out. The two groups responsible for the protests were the the Student-Afro American Society (SAS) and the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Although the SDS had violent motivations and militant ideals during this period when racial tension was high, the SAS was a peaceful and nonviolent group, and considering factors such as support from outside communities, the roles of social class, the groups’ leadership styles, and ultimate …show more content…

Harlem and other communities around the nation showed support for the protesters. In Tom Hayden’s “Two, Three, Many Columbias”, he states “...This process can only lead to greater unity in the movement… Support from outside the university communities can be counted on in many large cities…”(333).
It shows that the more Columbia was denying change, the more people that began to oppose them. People were tired of being mistreated and were siding with each other to make a change. The university continued to refuse basic social needs for the people, and the movement grew stronger and more unified as a result.
The SDS and SAS’s social background influenced how the situation unfolded. In Blake Slonecker’s piece “The Columbia Coalition: African Americans, new Leftists, and counterculture at the Columbia University protest of 1968”, he includes that “Of the 109 injuries specified in the NYPD’s interim report on the ordeal, only 32 occurred in or near the five occupied buildings”(10). It evident that the police didn’t use violence to clear the buildings, but rather to assert their dominance over the protestors. The NYPD used excessive and unnecessary force against the students, notably those in Hamilton Hall. Since the SAS had dismissed the SDS from their commune, the majority of the occupants of Hamilton Hall were black. This …show more content…

The SAS was organized, efficient, and had only one leader, unlike the SDS which lacked structure and consistency. In Bradley’s “‘This is Harlem Heights”: Black Student Power and the 1968 Columbia University Rebellion,” he includes “...the members of SAS had grown frustrated with the back and forth decision making that SDS used….” This shows that the SDS’s lack of efficiency was causing a conflict between the two groups. The SDS had no specific leader and took everyone’s perspective into account , while the SAS followed a leader who structured protests to support their

Get Access