Police Officer Diversity

When a law enforcement officer or other public employee is accused of potentially criminal conduct, they may face three different kinds of interviews or interrogations. If an officer is interviewed as a criminal suspect, they have the absolute right to decline to answer any questions, or to insist that they have a lawyer of their choosing to attend the interview. The first is type is during a criminal investigation; the second is during a disciplinary investigation and finally during the course of civil litigation where there has been damages. During a criminal interview, there is no professional, ethical or moral duty to participate especially without the assistance of an attorney to represent the officer under investigation. It has come to a surprise that many experienced officers will waive their right to silence and give the investigators an audio recorded statement. Some of the inexperienced criminals do not make incriminating statements. The motive for cooperation is to avoid unfavorable publicity.

Officers nationwide are trusted in court, as they swear to uphold the constitution and are professionals who act upon the law. A body camera is simply put in place to support the officers claim. If a peace officer is reported, instead of taking their word, body camera footage can be checked over to see if the officer acted in the wrong or right. Several causes can be false accusations again police officers. With the body camera in effect,

Section 3. When there is conflict of testimony, each party will be subject to a polygraph test to establish a more likely chance of determining which party is telling the truth.

It is hard for judges to make a decision when both sides present a different story in front of them. Recently there was a case where the side of the victim and the of the police officer had different stories to tell. This case which had occurred in Chicago will prove one of my reasons of why police officers should wear body cameras. The case involved five police officers who had swore under the oath that they had pulled over a suspect because he had failed to use his turn signal. "In court one the officer testified that when he asked the driver for his license and registration, he smelled marijuana and directed the suspect to leave the car and stand by the trunk as the vehicle was searched"(Scheindlin, 2015). During this search the officer

3. Procedures not followed. Every state has slightly different requirements when it comes to what information an officer is required to share, but there are a few warnings and pieces of advice that are either federally mandated or common to nearly all jurisdictions

In order to create more diversity on the force with the applicant pool, there are a few different approaches or techniques that I would follow through with. The first would be to bring officers of color and female officers to job fairs and recruitment events. With the view of most Police Officers being negative in today's world, I think that bringing diverse officers to these events shows that this job is one that is made available to all who strive for it. Regardless of skin color or gender. When students or young people have the opportunity to see that they can in fact relate to people working in this field and that they are welcome there, it creates bridges and opportunities to create a better world of policing. This also opens up the opportunity for students or people who are considering this line of work, the chance to ask important questions. They can ask the officer of color or

Facts of the case: Imagine you are an HR manager and your boss and owner of the company, Bill, comes to you suspecting his assistant, Paige, is stealing money from the company. Bill would like a polygraph test conducted to see if Paige is stealing from the company. He would also like you to conduct electronic surveillance on Paige’s work e-mail for anything suspicious.

A police officer must remember the court records his or her testimony in a written transcript, and sometimes by audio recording. The officer must master communicating orally when testifying in court because a stenographer cannot and will not type hand gestures, nods, shrugs, etc. (Wallace & Roberson, p. 115, 2009).

“Police, in most jurisdictions, have a special shield against interrogation known as the Law Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights” (Levine,2016). Consequently, the Garrity Rule is set in place to protect police officers accused of violating agency policies while performing their job duties thereof. Nevertheless, this rule is set up to shield police officers in need when they may have done any wrong doing or have been accused of doing so. “Equivalent of Miranda warnings whenever we are dealing with a criminal investigation” (Doerner,2016). Conversely, if enquiring for assumed criminal behavior, the officer has the right to utilize the Miranda rights and refer with his/her attorney. Nevertheless, if the questioning from the supervisor is administrative,

First off body cams is a great idea in my opinion for officers to wear while on duty because it will prevent the officers and citizens from not telling the truth. If the footage shows the officer misbehaving the officer most likely will not try to file a dishonest report, this can also play apart when the officer does something good because they will then present the actions

The first thing to determine is whether the type of questioning is part of a criminal or administrative investigation (Doerner, 2012). Under Miranda warnings, an officer cannot be compelled to make a statement or answer questions if they could incriminate themselves criminally. That officer would also be in a custodial situation and was not free to go. If the officer chooses to make a statement and/or answer questions, they can be used against the officer in criminal proceedings. It should be standard practice for investigators to have at least one witness and present the Miranda warnings in writing which state the following:

If a police officer is suspected of drug abuse, their department must offer specific reasons why they believe a drug trial is necessary. Departments may require a drug screening prior to employment. I have identified four areas where drug testing is mandatory.

Polygraph test should not be held admissible in the court system because it use falsely and it dont always catch the lies that have be told .The person can pass the test even when the statement was falsely answer wrong.Also another thing when the person is taken the test they are watching their Heart rate, Blood pressure,Respiration, skin and etc.

There are several types of questions an examiner will ask during the polygraph examination. There are the Relevant questions, Sacrifice relevant question, Comparison questions, Irrelevant questions and Introductory question. Relevant questions are simple questions that the examiner can easily answer with a “yes” or “no.” Sacrifice relevant question is asked to make sure the examinee intend to answer each questions truthfully. Next the examiner will introduce the comparison questions. These questions are asked in order to evaluate the examinees character and the issue at hand. The neutral questions simple questions that can be answered “yes”. These questions are asked to make sure the examinee is paying attention. The introductory question are asked to assure the examinee that no un-reviewed questions will be asked during the examination. After the polygraph examination is complete, the examiner will begin the post-test interview.

The polygraph test is one of the most controversial criminal investigative techniques of all-time. From the initial years of the invention to today, there is not a consensus about the investigative tool. That is why there are many people for and against the administration of polygraph tests. Therefore, in order to develop a clear picture of the polygraph test the history of the test must be established. Although, there are many sources that have well documented concerns about the invention, the polygraph test is still around after almost 80 years.