Police Officer Integrity

In order for a Police agency to prevent and deter Police misconduct, there must be a definition to what actions and behaviors that the term will encompass. The term ‘police corruption’ has been used to describe many activities: bribery; violence and brutality; fabrication and destruction of evidence; racism; favoritism or nepotism. Many different scholars differ in their own examples of the definition. Before attempting to the question of whether a precise definition is possible, it is worth examining the range of activities that might be included within a broad discussion of corruption. In (Bayley and Perito, 2011), it is defined as police corruption is a contested phrase with narrow and broad meanings. Narrowly

• Integrity: each police officer is presumed to do the right thing, at all times, regardless of the matter at hand, those involved and any other influences. Officers are held to a higher lever of integrity and expected to perform above all else, at all times (Baker, 2011).

Police officers are trained to read, write and analyze numbers. They are also trained how to handle firearms, identify non-lethal weapons, use defensive tactics effective, conduct search and seizure, driving techniques, investigate criminal acts and the laws of arrest, but how many police take a course on ethical conduct or learn the meaning of sworn oath? Some police officer feel ethics is not important and training is of low – priority. Law enforcement officers take oaths creates an ethical landmine. Officers have to weigh their personal values against colleague demands that may develop a hostile environment and cause ethical issues to flourish. When police officers demonstrate unethical practices, negative issues occur. Corruption scandals are painful reminders that officers need more

The Criminal Justice System is just like every other agency or corporation ever. Police integrity and ethics are fundamental to effective policing and helps with building trust within communities. Sound conduct by police improves the community interactions, enhances communication, and promotes shared responsibility for addressing crime and disorder. (USDOJ, 2014) Restoring ethics starts from the beginning, and that is too look harder into the employees or officers that you are going to hire. The thing is that it is much harder than it sounds. People can change or lie on their interviews. So you will never be able to fully prevent every person who might break ethical codes from entering into law enforcement. What you need to do first is let all new officers be aware of what they are getting themselves into.

In a survey 52% of police officers said it is common for law enforcement officials to disregard the inappropriate conduct of other officers. While 61% of officers claimed they usually do not report serious abuse that they have directly witnessed by colleagues. Yes, we all know that there are always going to be a few corrupt and unethical people within every profession, but these statistics show that within the police officer profession there are far more than a few corrupt and unethical

The culture is filled with dishonesty because police can get a pass by lying within the criminal justice system without taking accountability for their actions. Officers should take in perspective that their dishonestly may not only have their careers on the line, but the chances of the accused offender being wrongly convicted based on false reports and statements are can be avoided. Unfortunately, depending on the severity, some police organizations do not find anything wrong with dishonestly. In fact, most police agencies and organization may allow officers to fabricate small things that can be crucial to the

Police officers not only have to follow a set of rules and legislation, but they also must behave in a decent manner while on duty as well as off duty. Unfortunately, nobody is perfect, and police officers also make wrong decisions that could jeopardize the integrity of their police department. Often people know something they do is wrong. However, they still do it because they feel no harm will come to them or it they think nobody will ever find out. For instance, cheating on a test is wrong, but people do it because they think they can 't get away without the professor finding out.

Police corruption: An ethical issue in criminal justice CCJS 380 6980 Ethical Behavior in Criminal Justice Krystle Ellis September 27, 2015   Part One Police corruption is a form of misconduct when a police officer uses legitimate authority illegally for personal gain. Police have a duty to protect the citizens and create a sense of law and order (Beigel, 1974). To protect citizens police are supposed to curb crime and investigate it to bring the offenders to justice. Corruption is a crime that has become rampant today. Therefore, corrupt police forces cannot create a sense of order and legitimacy.

Their study utilized eleven Midwest and East Coast police agencies to measure the relationship of police integrity among 604 police officers. The police agencies ranged in various sizes from very large municipal agencies (more than 500 sworn officers) to very small police agencies (fewer than 25 sworn officers) in their published research. The authors used a voluntary online questionnaire for their research and their response rate was 34% of the officers in the study completed the questionnaire. They avoided demographic and identifying information, while at the same time, they framed hypothetical scenarios for the volunteers to respond to. There results were that the more serious the police corruption, the more likely the officers were to say that they would not tolerate it without reporting. However, for less serious infractions, the officers appeared to follow the code of silence (Ivkovic et al 2016:177-184). The “Code” appears to be inherent within police organizations and does serve an important element of the policeman’s position within the organization. The downside of this research is that quite possibly only the police officers with the highest ethical and moral standards chose to voluntarily complete the

Police corruption is one of the ethical issues affecting law enforcement officers. Corruption is defined as “impairment of integrity, virtue or moral principle; inducement to do wrong by improper or unlawful means” (Merriam Webster Online, 2009). While the most recognizable form of corruption involves officers taking money for favors (bribery), the actions that are considered corruption include filing false police reports, harassment of any person due to sex, race, creed, religion, national origin or sexual orientation, and failure to protect the rights of citizens. Corruption exists in all levels of law enforcement.

Law enforcement has one key ethical issue: integrity. Dictionary.com defines integrity as “adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty.” According to Cartwright, G. (2010) those who work in law enforcement “deal with temptation continually.” He continues by explaining that while most officers make the right decision, some do not. When the actions of law enforcement violate both ethical and lawful conduct, and those actions become public; “there is a lot of shock and confusion”. These transgressions must be investigated and addressed.

In Edwin J. Deltarres' book Character and Cops he explores three hypotheses for police corruption in the United States. Some are somewhat historical, but they are still relevant to the problem of corruption today. The first hypothesis is called "the society at-large" theory by former Chicago Police Superintendent O. W. Wilson. Wilson was superintendent of the Chicago Police Department during the early nineteen sixties. The second hypothesis is called the "structural" theory. The third is called "the rotten apple theory." I will provide a brief analysis of the three hypotheses in this essay and examine which one(s) is valid today.

In this country we are seeing an increase in ethical violations in the field of law enforcement. I will go into detail about some of the main ethical issues we are seeing today and what can be done to prevent such acts from happening. When one officer is being unethical it has a huge effect on how the public views law enforcement as a whole. Many officers go undetected for a long time before getting caught, but an officer committing ethical violations will have their day it’s just a matter of time. In order to improve this growing problem we must first understand why there is such a problem in the field of law enforcement.

Some argue that corrupt police officers are simply the product of a corrupt culture of the agency they work for. These officers are socially introduced to a number of informal rules when they begin employment. This process and these rules serve two main purposes. First, this process is designed to minimize the chances of external or internal controls being mobilized to address the behaviors and, secondly, to keep corrupt activities at a level that is acceptable and likely undetectable. The rule most often referred to in this connection, is the “Code of Silence.” Officers are socialized into not cooperating with investigations regarding fellow officers. Whether or not the officer participates in corrupt activities for financial gain, an officer’s adherence to the “Code of Silence” places them squarely amongst the corrupt of the profession (Price, 1972).

These types of misconduct arise throughout police jobs that include routine procedures such as traffic stops, ticket writing, directing traffic, and discouraging potential threats to those in their community. What often go unnoticed, though, are the undercover works and the corruptions that go on within a department. The four terms associated with these conflicting values are deviance, which is behavior inconsistent with the norms, values, or ethics, corruption, which is forbidden acts involving misuse of office for gain, misconduct, which is the violation of departmental procedures, and favoritism which is unfair “breaks” to friends or relatives.