Political Health Care Case Study

In the United States, healthcare has been one of the most controversial issue. Everyone needs to see a doctor when they don’t feel well or for routine check-ups. However, the reality is that not everyone could afford to see a doctor regularly to prevent serious illness. As a result, many people have died due to finding out their illness a bit too late because they have waited until the last minute to see a doctor and it was too late for the doctor to do anything about it. The situation could have been different if they were not lacking healthcare coverage. The government has stepped in to fix the issue but the problem persists due to the complexity of the healthcare system and its involvement with the political system. The Democratic and Republican

Health care reform and access to insurance have been staples of the American political agenda ever since the end of World War II. From President Truman’s call for universal coverage in the late 1940’s to the creation of Medicaid and Medicare to the Affordable Care Act, both parties have debated how to lower the rate of uninsured Americans. After nearly 70 years of debate in Washington and beyond, the number of Americans with health insurance has certainly grown (Miller, 2014). However, the number of people in the United States without coverage is still unacceptably high and a problem that should be addressed with a great deal of urgency and care.

House Resolution (H.R.) 370 was introduced to Congress on January 9th, 2017 by Republican Rep. Bill Flores of Waco, Texas. The bill itself is quite simple, totaling two pages in length. The main purpose of the bill is repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), completely restoring or reviving the laws it amended as if it had never existed. Unlike similar repeals to the ACA, this bill does not have a replacement plan or any sort of alternate plan. It simply takes the ACA away and restores the law to their pre-ACA state. This is concerning for many reasons, but it may also have some benefits as well. The future of America’s health care is ever changing and it is more important

The purpose of this paper is to understand the influence a political party may have on regulating healthcare. Furthermore, it proves the responsibility of the occupational therapists to investigate and advocate in politics regarding health care that may affect future clients and/or quality of care. The occupational therapy student (OTS) will present research on the libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, and his views on healthcare and occupational therapy.

ObamaCare, also known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is a Health care reform law that was signed on March 23, 2010. ObamaCare’s goal is to provide more Americans with affordable health care insurance. ObamaCare also hopes to improve the quality of healthcare and health insurance in America, regulate the healthcare industry, and reduce the cost of healthcare in the United States. ObamaCare is made up of ten titles; I: Quality, Affordable Healthcare for all United State Citizens, II: The Role of Public Programs, III: Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Healthcare, IV: Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving Public Health, V: Healthcare Workforce, VI: Transparency

Quality healthcare in the more rural areas of the United States is not only getting more difficult to obtain, but difficult to afford. American citizens living in rural areas have the highest rates of chronic disease, higher poverty populations, less health insurance, and there is less access to primary care physicians. When the economy is at its lowest point it causes an increase in a number of access and health issues that have already had prior problems in communities and in rural areas, therefore the main goal of the national health care tax of 2010 was to allow coverage to all residents of the United States, and also by transferring necessary health care to places that were farther away, such as the

Every nation holds multitudes of health care policy facing debate. Analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of other countries could benefit the United States of America to create improvements. For decades, the right to health care in the United States has fueled public debates and social conversation. Should we implement the right similar to European policies? The United States struggles in agreement to start making changes, but we can develop plans from successes seen in Italy. Italy has achieved cost containment and patient coverage, which are two of the largest struggles within the United States health care system. This paper will outline Italian structure and policies to aid in the process of formulating a plan for positive changes by describing the following: finances and structure of Italian health care, disparities seen within Italian health care offered, the overall structure of the United States health care system and conclusion of suggestions to better our health care system.

All people utilize health care services at one point or another. All federal policies that intend to reform health care will affect the lives of all citizens. Currently the United States spends the highest amount on health care with the one of the lowest health outcomes compared other developed countries. In 2010, $8,233 per person was spent on health care, but with a life expectancy of 78.7 years (Kane, 2012). As a response to the high health care cost and low health care outcomes, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), or most colloquially known as Obamacare. ACA was designed to address some of the issues that prevent people from receiving health insurance and transitioning from a privatized

Health care is a topic that has been extremely politicized over the past decade and will continue to be a political issue in decades to come. Research and scientific data helps identity solutions to the current problems within health care; however, only politics can turn those solutions into reality and define the problems (Oliver, 2006). Since the majority of our health care issues and its solutions lie in the hands of politics, this can become toxic to our system by costing the nation, paralyzing the legislative process, and preventing the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the development of progressive health policy.

the info. In fact, the writer cited the references and suggested more website to find more information about the topic. Truly, samples and statics are incorporated in the article, which pursue the information. Moreover, the quantitative method is perfect for the investigation. In fact, the interrelationship between paragraphs is coherence and clear, it has not grammar mistakes.

Since families that go to St. Jude for treatment never receives a bill, some felt that this healthcare reform would threaten the tax-exempt status for this hospital. According to Carrie Strehlau, a spokesperson for St. Jude, “the implementation of the healthcare reform would not impact the way St. Jude provide care” (Scurlock, 2013). She goes on to say that “St. Jude would not have a problem meeting all of the ACA’s requirements” (Scurlock, 2013). Even though, St. Jude doesn’t anticipate any fines, they are still required to do a community needs survey and file paperwork with the IRS every three years to show they are still needed in the community. Since 2010, St. Jude has complied with all requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable

One of the quintessential promises of Obama’s campaign in 2008 was to reform health care. In the 2008 democratic platform, democrats rallied around a “commitment that every American man, woman, and child be guaranteed affordable, comprehensive health care” (2008 Democratic Party Platform). While it was uncertain exactly how reform would look like, Democrats and Obama strove for some specific qualifications for reform. He promised reform in reproductive health care, promised to lower drug and health care costs and raise quality of care, promised an end to insurance discrimination, and promised the oft quoted mantra of “if you like your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor; if you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your

The next goal is efficiency, which is how much you get per input. Trump healthcare brought up a health savings account. This would-be a saving for health when you needed to go to the doctors for any issue are but any medications, but the issue is if you are not a rich American you more than likely don’t have extra money to put into a savings for health emergencies. Another component in the bill was a refundable tax credit. Everyone loves free money, and it would help with paying premiums. The issue with the tax credit is that it would be based on age not income, so younger adults who need coverage or the money to pay the high premiums would not benefit from this. In both the savings account and the refundable tax credit it was only efficient

According to Mason, (2016), political analysis is the process of examining an issue and understanding the key factors and people that might potentially influence a policy goal.(Mason, et al., 2016). It involves the analysis of government and organizations, both public and private, people and their behavior, and the social, political, historical and economic factors surrounding the policy (p. 80). It also includes the identification and development of strategies to attain or defeat a policy goal (Mason, et al., 2016). In the context of health policy reform, political analysis is important because it can aid in understanding of past health reforms and assist in predicting the outcomes of ongoing or future initiatives (Blanchet, et al., 2013).

I feel like the role of the government has not really changed at all in the healthcare system. The reason I say this is because no matter what the people of the country need, they revise and make the laws that they see fit. in my opinion, the government and the pharmicutical companies work together to create the most money making form of healthcare.