Political Impact Of The French Revolution

‘Liberté, égalité, fraternité’: the motto that France uses to this day and first came about as a result of the French Revolution. This in itself shows that the revolution had a major impact on France. It played a significant role in changing France through, for example, the new definition of nationalism, the abolition of the monarchy and the abolition of feudalism. Whether these changes succeeded in modernising France or resulted in something that was not any better than pre-revolutionary times is what will be discussed in more detail using the above three examples.

The French Revolution ended up transforming Europe’s governments into unstable governing systems. The French Revolution is considered to be a model event that the people looked towards as inspiration to create change in their own governments. These revolutions happened often and did not always have successful outcomes; these revolutionaries shook the foundations of the government and created an unsteady base. This occurrence of this instability of the government is mainly due to the inequity of the people, poor choices in economics, and the rise of different political views. The French Revolution created a lot of upheaval within all of the nation’s governments.

The French Revolution (1789-1814) was a period that affected the outcome of world history tremendously. This is considered a major turning point in European history which has led to dramatic changes in France and other regions of the world. Various social and political issues led to the start of the revolution. Politically, France suffered under the rule of Louis XVI, who ruled by absolute monarchy. Many people had their natural rights renounced and weren’t able to have a political voice. Socially, France had divided its population within 3 estates (classes). French citizens took it upon themselves to remodel their country 's’ political structure. The French Revolution had encountered both positive and negative effects. However, many Europeans viewed the Revolution as much more than just a bloody massacre. The French Revolution was used to demonstrate new ideology that would emphasize the principles of liberty and equality throughout Europe.

France, in the 1700s, was not in good standing with its own people, or it’s surrounding countries. The people were split into three socials estates. The First Estate consisted of wealthy clergymen. The Second estate was built up of established noblemen who were the major landowners, but they were slightly less wealthy than the clergy. The Third Estate was composed of poor people, whom were split into two distinct groups, the Bourgeoisie and the peasants. The Bourgeoisie were wealthy however, because they were born into the Third Estate, they were stuck. The Bourgeoisie were treated badly, even though they were economically equal to the upper classes, they were socially restricted. Many weights of the country fell upon the Third Estate, resulting in much contention during this time.

It would be difficult at best to argue that the French Revolution was not one of the most significant events in the history of Europe. Amongst a sea of rebellions, revolts, wars and squabbles, it was the first true fall of a Monarchy that Europe had ever seen, the end of an ancient regime that had stood for nearly a millennium. But did it actually mean any real change for the citizens of Europe? The answer is absolutely “Yes”. While the lives of the citizens outside of France fall outside of the scope of this paper, simply examining the lives of French citizens is more than enough. One need only look at the laws, and the changes to both the privileges and the responsibilities possessed by the various positions of society to see a clear contrast of before and after. France’s society and economy were nearly upended, with all three estates experiencing severe alterations to the fabric of their society.

French identity has been through massive changes during the French Revolution. French citizens developed feelings of pride and loyalty for their country because the new constitution gave them rights such as equality and a say in government (through voting).

For 10 years, the French Revolution impacted Europe politically and socially. Historical figures such as Napoleon Bonaparte and King Louis XVI led this war. Throughout the French Revolution (1789-1799), many things, such as the government, were constantly changing. Poverty encompassed France, this as well as other factors ultimately led to the French Revolution. Incompetent rulers, social commands, the aristocracy, financial issues, and Enlightenment provoked and caused the French Revolution. The French Revolution was successful due to the making of France's new constitution and new social rights for people due to Enlightenment ideas.

The French Revolution, some say that it was successful and some say that it was not. In my opinion, for the most part the French Revolution was a success. This is a cause and effect essay that describes the long-term causes and effects and the immediate causes and effects of the French Revolution. It lasted from 1789 to 1799 and was a turning point event in Europe. France was divided into three estates : First, Second, and Third Estate. The First Estate consisted of the clergy and Church leaders. The Second included nobles and the Third was made of up mostly peasants. King Louis XVI was the leader of France during the Revolution until January 21, 1793. On this day the Convention beheaded Louis XVI for being a traitor and committing wrong actions toward the state. The Queen, Marie Antoinette was also killed nine months later and the popular press celebrated her death.

The French revolution of 1789 is often cited as one of the pivotal events in the formation of the modern world, a world which, contrarily, neither required a revolution during such a time period nor a particularly French one at that. Indeed, societal change occurs almost solely in times of relative crisis and furthermore tends to follow the contained characteristic of such, only occurring in the immediate vicinity of the upheaval in question. The combination of debt, famine, and an expanding divide between the governing elite and the lower social classes can be argued to have been the ultimate cause of the revolution in France, just as the political and economic degradation following the end of the Second World War can be linked to the rise

As a result, the Napoleon together with the French revolutionary armies invaded the European colonies armed with radical institutional reforms and changes (Acemoglu et al., 2009). The French aimed to get rid of the judicial and economic set standards which had initially offered protection to the aristocratic oligarchies, fraternity, clergy and the noble. In so doing, the French were seeking to bring about the proposition of the law of equality for all humankind and thus promote liberty for each and every citizen. History records those regions initially run and operated by the Frenchmen proved prolific concerning economic sustenance after having undergone urbanization. Therefore the French invasion had no adverse impact on the countries which were run by it and instead showeda robust social, political and economic growth (Acemoglu et al., 2009). The French revolution, therefore, lay to waste the constitutional underpinnings of power initially held by the few and theelite of the society and brought about industrial, social and economic revolution thus paving the way for a prosperous future. They brought a new age and era of change as they fought to break down and destroy the antiquated, medieval systems of governance which were oppressive and

Radicalism was alive in Britain from the late eighteenth century, yet Parliament resolutely refused to reform itself until the late 1830s. It is therefore tempting to dismiss extra-parliamentary protest during this period as having failed to bring about any substantial reform in the face of Government repression.

The French Revolution was certainly one of the most important events in Europe’s political history and highlighted the importance of the new age of Enlightenment. The outcomes of the Revolution were many: its short comings led to the rise of the Napoleonic Regime and Robespierre’s reign through terror led other European revolutionaries to step back in fear. However, whilst the revolution failed to achieve all it had aimed to do; it did overthrow its monarchy, creating the first true European Republic, and was able to introduce a slither of democratic ideology into a society used to aristocratic dictatorship, showing other European states that the people really did have power; proving, for the first time, that left-wing ideology was

Have you ever heard that the Royal blood is blue? Looking at the French Revolution, the royal blood wasn’t blue, but “jaundiced shade of red and riddled with broken chromosomes.” The French Revolution was a period of economical and social events that led to a crisis, which lasted from 1789 until 1799 due to the inefficiency of the French government and rebellion against the government too. The dissatisfaction of people against the Monarch and the debt of the government were specifically two of the main causes that led to the French Revolution.

The French revolution is one of the more influential events to have happened in the history of France and in world’s history. The revolution that started with the movement of the people to help them get a better life styles to out come from the drought that the French was living at that time. The French revolution which was held at the 18th century was a turning point in the French and world’s history because of its philosophical and political impact.

The given interpretation 'Between 1789 and 1815 supporters of the French Revolution posed no threat to the established order of Britain' suffers from a few problems . Firstly it suggests supporters posed ‘no serious threat’ however it does not elaborate on what a ‘serious’ threat actually is. Secondly it covers a 26 year period ‘1789-1815’ which is a long time and numerous things could change within this period, Britain goes to war with France and the ‘industrial revolution’ begins which would suggest things would not be as black and white as there never being a threat at all. While a few bits of evidence do support this interpretation, a better alternative would be ‘supporters of the French