Political Liberalism And Conservatism

Nosek experiment ‘Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations’, 2009. This study is an American study of moral psychology that examined why American liberals and conservatives view the moral foundations with different ranges of significance for each other using the MFT. By using five sets of moral foundations they conducted four different studies and were able to observe the relationship between political views and moral foundation. Using scales to measure stages of moral reasoning and exploration of the patterns in variation of participants’ moral judgments across a liberal-conservative political spectrum using the MFT. It was found, in all four studies, American liberals displayed a strong pattern in their morality results, that being liberals value moral foundations one (1) and two (2) with most significance (harm / care and fairness / reciprocity), while American conservatives generally demonstrate a more equal distribution of all five moral

Liberalism has embraced several fundamental details of an element, at a different time in history liberal ideology has emphasized different aspects of its basic principles. Those ideas have much impact on the idea as a force between the people and their government, the rights of people were overthrown, in favor of a new system, their rights were violated,but they strongly believed that natural rights belong to all people, faith, support of all humanity have become very natural to their future. Limited powers to majority rule specified by the minority rights as their support become more of a change in our society.

The results of the ideology test proved myself to be a moderated and a centrist on the spectrum between conservatism and liberalism. This result is very accurate in my political views and I have always been aware that depending on the moral (score 1), economic (score 8), and foreign policy (-9) issues my stances cancel out on the political spectrum. For example, I do stand for pro-choice, however I also stand for having “In God We Trust” on our bills. In refection of my answers I do see the pattern of my progressive modern ideals such as stronger diplomatic efforts and social acceptance of LGBT. Yet I also see the conservative views of this nation, as I do not believe in the raising of minimum wage or the closing of the wealth gap. This exercise was an interesting test of how my views are undeniably between the poles of conservatism and liberalism. Even though I am definitely more conservative on economic issues

Hey Jacquelyn, I really liked your post. I completely agree with you, I noticed how good some of these ideologies sounded but then found out that Nazis or other bad thingswere created by it. It's wild how the tiny details and fine tuning really plays a factor on how some of these ideology's work out in the end. To your statement that we need to combine ideologies to make it work, I think you're right but I don't think they ever will. Liberalism, Conservatism, Socialism are pretty mutually exclusive and rarely do we see a Liberal government practicing conservative views. There should be a balance but if anything we're becoming more polarized and biased. Perhaps one day well change that. Good

After taking the self evaluation survey from StudentNewsDaily.com on liberal and conservative beliefs, I appear to be moderate. I evaluated myself on 21 different topics under the political spotlight and ranked myself on a scale one through ten, one being extremely liberal, and ten being extremely conservative. My score fell in the range being neutral between both viewpoints. On some topics I am extremely liberal, and on others I am extremely conservative.

As described in the text, Republicanism literally means a government without a king and conjured up memories of beheading of Charles I. They assumed that only citizens who owned land or property possess "virtue", as the willingness to subordinate self-interest to the pursuit of the public good. They didn't want to be controlled by the ministry and in fact, criticized the expansion of national debt and growing wealth of financial speculators. Republicans liberty had a public and social quality, whereas Liberalism was essentially individual and private. Liberalism was associated with those who surrender a part of their right to govern themselves to enjoy the benefits of the rule of law. "It was compatible with substantial inequalities in wealth

The differences between Liberalism and Conservatism are vast. These philosophies are in opposition to each other. Liberalism is based on active government involvement in the lives of people to make sure that they are taken care of financially, rights are not violated, and that their healthcare needs are taken care of; mostly by the government. Liberalism believes that people cannot take care of themselves without government involvement (Sidlow, 2017).

Both modern conservatism and liberalism are exceptionally reasonable ideologies. The classic liberalism of Adam Smith and classic conservatism of Edmund Burke and the modern versions of the same are still with us” (Roskin 19). This means modern conservatism originated from classical liberalism. The root of this goes back to the 17th century until to the early 20th century.

People are motivated to reduce dissonance. Past research has shown that dissonance can be relieved when participants wash their hands (Lee & Schwarz, 2010). We believe dissonance can occur in individuals when they support a presidential candidate who does not hold the same moral values as them. Haidt et al. (2007) included a figure in their article which showed that liberals rated values such as “care” and “fairness” as relevant to morality, whereas conservatives rated “authority” and “purity” as relevant to morality.

The philosophical meaning of the terms liberalism and conservatism in the American political discourse were defined as the following in the textbook, Liberalism: is simply the recognition of a sphere of individual rights that government should respect and leave untouched (Ethridge, 31). However, in today’s political discourse it essentially means that: 1) the government is required achieve equality for all citizens, and not to discriminate between citizens. 2) the government is required to protect human rights and civil liberties. 3) it is the government’s role to ensure that all citizens are not in need and that all of the social and political issues should primarily be solved by the government.

Conservatism is a political reasoning that focuses on traditional beliefs when faced with external change. These beliefs may concern religious, cultural or national customs. Conservatives disapprove of radical social change, wishing to keep customs and the way of life the way it is, or make changes slowly. Conservatism involves right-wing politics, which seeks to protect one’s wealth and property, stressing the importance of self-reliance. Conservatives believe there is a need for improvement within healthcare. They believe the system is capable of being fixed with reform measures, such as encouraging competition among the health insurance companies. Conservatives believe in limited government, free markets, and a strong national defense.

The Hibbing et al. article claiminged that negativity bias, which can be linked to neuroticism and was more evident in conservatives, doesn’t fit with already established correlations between personality and political ideology. Feldman &and Huddy have two issues with the core article, “(1) that political ideology is best presented as a single dimension of political beliefs and attitudes, and (2) that it can be explained by differential reactions to negative stimuli.” Their Hibbing et als argument is based off the idea that labelling people as liberal or conservative is too single unidimensional and not unrealistic, as there is current research pertaining to the idea theory of two dimensions of ideology, the economic, and social/moral. Feldman & and Huddy argue that the importance of these two dimensions are downplayed by Hibbing et al., and what is considered by them to be conservative or liberal isn’t clear enough to attach certain meaning to. Referring to evidence from multi-national social and economic correlation studies (Cochrane 2010), underlying processes and different physiological correlation studies (Feldman 2013), and a study ascertaining that self identifying conservatives and liberals are internally heterogeneous (Feldman and Johnson

“We will not agree on every issue. But let us respect those differences and respect one another. Let us recognize that we do not serve an ideology or a political party; we serve the people”, by John Lynch. In this quote written by John Lynch, it expresses the fact that there are many differences within ideology and political parties, but at the end of the day they are to serve the people and they should be respected for their differences. Therefore, there are wo major ideologies that have numerous differences and similarities. Within these ideologies there are social conservatives, which is “a version of conservatism that advocates public policies based on traditional morals and religious values.” (Demichele 2017). Likewise, there is social liberalism a version of liberals that belief “of liberty, rights, and egalitarianism with a focus on collective equally” (Demichele 2017). The social liberalism represents more of collectivism and the social conservatives is more individualism. Religion in a society and government is very important because the rules and regulation can come from religion. In a social conservatism society, religion and traditional morals are practiced and embedded in their society while in a social liberal society is more focused on secular stance where there is no religious or spiritual basis. This paper would explore, the similarities and differences in regard to the two ideologies, social liberalism and social conservatives, and their views on feminism,

It’s no surprise that humans are subject to the expectations around them; we are social creatures, after all. Because of this, we rely heavily on social norms and cues in order to better understand how to integrate with society and, as a result, we take on characteristics of our family, friends, and associates in the hopes of “fitting in.” One of these social norms includes political affiliation. This concept of forming political ideas through friends, family, and other social constructs such as the education system and the media is called “political socialization.”

Liberalism If we want to speak about liberalism, we have to speak about how liberalism came into the nationals systems of many countries. Liberalism includes a lot of different political philosophies and people have fight for it or against it over time. Nowadays it is criticized but