Political Party Vs Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood is a controversial topic sweeping the nation of America with political and moral issues. Every day one could come across a new article on it, stubble upon a news article in their local paper or even on their local news station. Planned Parenthood directly provides reproductive health services, is involved in teach young students about sexual education, contributes to research in reproductive technology, and interacts with legal and political efforts aimed at protecting and developing reproductive rights.

Affordable reproductive health care is hard to find for low-income women, and many people feel that without Planned Parenthood women will have no care at all. Another problem according to the article “Planned Parenthood and the Next Generation of Feminist Activists”, the younger generation Americans do not “want to be labeled. They don’t like being singularly defined by their political party, or their sexual orientation, or their views on abortion” (Laguens 188). The younger generation simply do not want to identify as “pro-choice” or

“I will defend Planned Parenthood. I will defend Roe v. Wade and I will defend women's rights to make their own healthcare decisions.” -Hillary Clinton

Numerous Americans, including some who are pro-choice regarding abortion, do not want their tax money used through Planned Parenthood for abortion. Staunchly religious people against abortion, claiming that it insults God to “kill unborn children,” are also against Planned Parenthood for giving out the service of abortion (DailySignal). Moreover, the selling of fetal parts by PP has become a big issue that is increasing the support for defunding PP.

The U.S. Senate blocked a bill to defund Planned Parenthood and channel federal dollars to other health care providers and community health centers that do not perform abortions on Monday.

For almost a century one company has risen to a height where they felt they had all authority. A company that receives over half a billion dollars each and every year in government funding. A company that instead of thanking the American People and understanding the value of each American life, disrespects it through criminal acts of which they have not been punished. The question is: Why does a government continue to fund a criminal? If we fund Planned Parenthood, why do we not fund murders with guns? Why do we not give ISIS what THEY want? We must call for immediate action against Planned Parenthood and DEFUND criminals.

Mike Huckabee, an American politician, Christian minister, and a former Governor of Arkansas. Huckabee speculates in his article “The battle goes beyond Planned Parenthood” that America should end abortion. Although Huckabee argues his points that abortion is taking money out of are paychecks and harvesting babies’ organs, he weakens his argument by using insufficient and unrepresentative samples. As a result, support needed to make this a strong argumentative writing.

This is a response to your Editorial “What Defunding Planned Parenthood Would Really Mean” from October 7, 2015. Within this article, you argue about the flaws in the plan to defund Planned Parenthood. You prove this through the information of Nixon’s Title X, and the importance of Title X existing. While I agree with your opinion, that Planned Parenthood should be funded. However I disagree with your view of what Title X does. Since, if Parent Parenthood was defunded Title X would still exist.

President Trump signed an executive order on Monday, January 23, 2017 barring federal funds from organizations that promote abortion around the world, including the International Planned Parenthood Federation, in what activists say is the president’s first major pro-life action while in office (Richardson, 2017). The Mexico City Policy known as the “gag rule policy” by abortion rights organizations, is a U.S government policy blocking US federal funding for non-governmental organizations that provide abortion counselling or referrals, and advocate to decriminalize abortion or expand abortion services. This policy dates back to the Reagan-era policy and was rescinded by President Clinton in 1993, restored by President Bush in 2001, overturned

Pro Life was against the partnership of Komen with Planned Parenthood mainly due to its abortion services. However in 2011 Komen defended her partnership with the Planned Parenthood by stating that it was the best option for treatment for the poor, minor and many uninsured women. Also there are statements that assured that the funding from the Komen to the Planned Parenthood was exclusively used for the breast cancer program. But due to extreme pressure the Komen was influenced to act in the favor of the prolife and finally posted a statement on its website on November 30, 2011 stating that it would no longer fund the embryonic stem cell research centers. In order to cope with the crisis situation Komen hired Ogilvy crisis management public

One much debated Women’s issue that Republicans and Democrats contrast their views on is birth control. Democrats tend to support women’s access to birth control while Republicans tend to be against it. Democrats want women to be able to obtain birth control easily and want sexual education to be available in schools, both to prevent unwanted pregnancy (republicanviews.org). This includes funding for those who cannot afford their birth

On October 19th, 2016 the last presidential debate took place between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. On the same day, there was a viewing party hosted by a local healthcare clinic for its employees and whomever else they wanted to include. The viewing party was open to all employees of this healthcare group ranging from janitors, to accountants, and physicians. The party was held at a local event space with the ability to host approximately 100 people. The event was easily at capacity on the evening of the party. The audience was made up of primarily females between the ages of 30-50. Approximately half of the women brought their children. The children’s ages ranged from infancy to 20. The ethnicities of the audience varied from Asian American,

Opposers though, could argue that they also have the liberty to try and express their beliefs and influences, and not being able to do so inflicts their freedom of speech. Regarding the case of abortion again, there have been several instances where pro-life advocates have had their life threatened due to their beliefs and freedom of speech. One occurrence took place in North Carolina, where a 23 year old woman tried to run over pro-life supporters who stood outside an abortion clinic praying for those who entered (Zagorski). Another instance involved a man getting arrested for advocating and praying near a Chicago clinic even though he did nothing that truly broke the law (Macedo) .Those against abortion or Planned Parenthood could argue

As the world is being overpopulated in the view of some people, there has been a chance that the on-going generation has made plans throughout their life that doesn not involve marriage, children, or even any types of dating/ love. However, humans being humans and as curious and desirous as they are, they are still wanting to behave as humans and using their right to procreate without an eternal purpose. There has been an issue involving the argument of abortion and planned parenthood, if those two topics concerning the population growth/ decay and the personal rights of people who have a choice to procreate using their bodies.

Although birth control was approved as contraception by the FDA in the 1960s, the use of it is still a hot topic of debate nearly sixty years later. While birth control has many different uses, from medical reasons to family planning, this has caused the debate on whether it should be considered basic health care to be split into two separate categories: women having a right to resources vs women having a right to regulate their sex life. For years women have been concentrating on arguments that downplay their sexual freedom such as medical reasons to obtain birth control with little to no results. “They understood that if women did not control their own reproduction, someone else would control it, since states, capitalists, churches, and families have serious investments in controlling women’s bodies” (Ferguson). Women should fight for a right to birth control as a resource and to also regulate their sex life.