Political Theories And Ideology Of Liberal Democracy Essay

We know that democracies are common among the economically urbanized countries and rare between the very deprived ones. The reason we scrutinize this pattern is not that democracies are more probable to emerge, as a result, of economic development but that they are to a large extent more possible to survive if they occur to emerge in most urbanized countries. The paths to democracy are diverse. Indeed, they appear to follow no unsurprising pattern. But once democracy is conventional, for whatever reasons, its endurance depends on a few, easily particular, factors.

The gerrymandering process allows the majority party within a given state to maximize the number of seats it can win in the future elections. This leads it into creating as many districts as possible where it constitutes the majority. By doing this, those who support the minority parties are packed into the remaining few districts. This results in more electoral security for the minority party and less electoral security for the members of the minority parties. It also produces greater homogeneity within the districts while reducing competition for the house seats. Apart from the positive effects of gerrymandering, there are a number of negative effects associated with partisan gerrymandering. This process results in more competitive districts when compared to the non competitive districts and this in turn ambiguously affects polarization. Partisan gerrymandering also affects the state legislative electoral competitiveness as it has severe partisan biases. Excessive partisan gerrymandering is the violation of the equal protection clause since it consigns the

There are two types of gerrymandering, the first is called packing. Packing is when you put the same type of people in one electoral district. Why is packing helpful?, well packing can decrease the chance of one party influencing the other party. Cracking is the other way of gerrymandering, this is when you spread one party out to decrease their impact on the district, causing the other party to win the district. Gerrymandering in general sounds a little wrong in a political view. It sounds very wrong after hearing about the great gerrymander in 2012. In the house of representatives we have 435 seats. To be able to determine how many seats go to a state every ten years the department of commerce holds something called a census. The

Politics in the United States is a complex structure that is comprised of many systems. While most of these systems appear to work well, there are a few that are broken. A perfect example of a broken system is the district boundaries and the likelihood of gerrymandering. Multiple states across the country are subjected to gerrymandering, which is the act of dividing a county into election districts that provide one political party with an unfair advantage over the other. Gerrymandering is used to help or prevent a particular demographic from gaining adequate representation. In Florida, for example, there is controversy over Congressional District 5, which extends from Jacksonville down to Orlando in a way that creates a “minority-majority” district.

The term “gerrymandering” can be traced back to Elbridge Gerry, who was one of the first governors to sign a redistricting plan that would give his party an advantage. Gerrymandering is the act of redrawing congressional districts in a way that favors one group or another. This is done by the state legislature, and is designed to favor their own party. Gerrymandering is harmful to elections. Gerrymandering is harmful towards elections because it can dilute a candidate's voter base, free up the majority of other districts for an opposing party, and alter the weight of a voter's vote.

Gerrymandering is the process of altering electoral districts to favor a political party over the other by receiving more votes in that districts based on the population demographics and party affiliation. Gerrymandering was founded when Governor Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts had enacted a bill that would allow the state to the redistricted in a way that would favor the party he represented, which was the Democratic-Republican Party, over the Federalists. When the redistricting plan was brought to the press, the term was created using Governor Gerry's name and salamander after one district in Boston appeared to look like a salamander.

When gerrymandering occurs, a political party draws the boundaries of an electoral district in a way that helps their party win elections over the other parties. For example, if a Republican controls a state, and it appears like the party will lose a seat in the future, the

The main purpose of gerrymandering is to increase the number of legislative seats that can be won by the political party which is in charge of redrawing the district boundaries during that period of time, and to create “safe” seats for the party’s incumbent legislators which are seats in which the incumbent will always win re-election. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of election district boundaries to give an electoral advantage to a particular candidate or party. It has been recognized as a part of the American political landscape since 1812. The term derives from a redrawing of US Representative districts in Massachusetts before the 1812 elections, when

Gerrymandering may prevent the purpose of members being elected on a single-member district basis because districts can be drawn favoring one political party. Gerrymandering is when districts have been drawn so the boundaries of legislative districts in bizarre or unusual shapes to favor one party. Gerrymandering protects incumbents and discourages challengers and it strengthens the majority party while weakening the opposition party

There is currently a case in the supreme court regarding gerrymandering. This case came from Wisconsin. Not only that, but gerrymandering is destroying the fair voting system. It gives one political party the advantage over the other and that is not right.

Gerrymandering is a brilliant but unjust technique. Elections like one in 2012 show us how their is corruption in the system. A party should not be able to win control of congress if the opposing party received more votes. In 2012 the Republicans gained control of the House although the Democrats received over a million more votes.

How many of you here actually know what Gerrymandering is? Well, the dictionary definition of Gerrymandering is "The diving of a state into election districts so as to give one political party a majority in many districts while concentrating the voting strength of the other party into as few districts as possible," Harper, 1) but thats a very vague definition. In my own words, Gerrymandering is almost like when you build a puzzle, and you take all the outer pieces first because they're easier, well, Gerrymandering is basically re-shaping the districts when people are often moving between one and the other, and finding one where the population is relatively low. Why low?

Gerrymander can be best described as a way to favor a particular party by ensuring a seat to obtain power or control of a state.

Gerrymandering is the use of redrawing certain districts and manipulating the boundaries allowing a political advantage to one’s party and the other a disadvantage. This process occurs every ten years as new political candidates run to be a government official ( Fan 737 ). It started in 1812 where Governor Gerry redrew the district lines of Massachusetts, giving his party an advantage. That is how Gerrymandering got its name. Usually, the person who redraws the district goes after the urban areas because of how populated they are compared to rural areas. This is not good for the United States because of many reasons; Gerrymandering create districts that are confusing to voters because of the weird shapes and sizes, claims of the party can be contradictory, and the fact that gerrymandering is around, makes the people believe that the candidates are corrupted and running the right the vote. ( RULEY 785 ).

Today, the two strands of liberal democracy that is intertwined in the Western political fabric are falling apart in the rest of the world. Democracy is flourishing and constitutional liberalism is not. To this day 118 of the world 's 193 countries are democratic, enclosing most of its people, that is 54.8% which is a huge increase from even a decade ago. The countries that lie between dictatorship and consolidated democracy do