Politics In George Orwell's Politics And The English Language

George Orwell uses pathos in Politics and the English Language. He does this to evoke emotion from the reader. The author’s manner of using pathos is well done. Throughout his paper, the author uses pathos in examples and specific wording. Throughout the paper’s entirety, the paper elicits feelings of inferiority and stupidity. Whether the author intended this or not is unclear. Yet, it is clear that the manner in which the author speaks uses pathos a lot.

In “Politics and The English Language ”, George Orwell describes how lazy and imprecise phrases, stale images and jargon declining modern English. According to Orwell the decline of a language have political and economic causes. Orwell also claims that the reason behind bad writing is corrupt thinking, which later makes a person to attempt more palatable corrupt acts. Orwell states, “Political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible.” which explains that sometimes corrupted government and politicians use language and media as a strategy to oppress citizens by creating false tension. Most of the time politicians try to hide their flaws by telling something irrelevant things which hides the true meaning. Orwell identify one method corrupt writers use is ‘Pretentious Diction’ which represents uses of vague words such political, economical, scientific and sociological words, which are increased in slovenliness and vagueness and hard for general people to understand. And they use it to confuse people and hide some real facts about a situation or mislead people.

Politics is the never ending power struggle Americans know all too well. It’s a childish game full of lies, deceit, and beating around the bush where those involved find themselves having to simultaneously put on a smile for the camera. In the writing, Politics and the English Language, the author, George Orwell, discusses why he believes politics in fact are destroying the English language. Throughout the reading, the author makes many great points; however, his tone is interpreted as extreme, and at times, he comes off as radical when defending his claim.

Parent/Child: The Parson Family – In life today the parent and the child protect each other. However, in 1984 the child turns in the parent for thoughtcrime. Essentially there is no concept of family, everyone is

Orwell describes verbal false limbs and pretentious diction as extra wording in an idea to make it sound nicer to the ear or sound more intelligent. A verbal false limb is the misuse of verbs and nouns to give a sentence more syllables, while pretentious diction is where foreign expressions or higher level words are chosen to enhance the sentence. These both negatively affect language and meaning because they do not make any idea more clear to the reader, they are only used to make them sound smarter, therefore even confusing some readers. Students definitely use these tactics in order to make the teacher think that they know what they are talking about when really they have no clue what is going on. If they sound smart, than the teacher

In the totalitarian society of Oceania, people are controlled in every possible way. Big Brother, the main leader, constantly uses persuasion and language to maintain power over the people. Newspeak, the language of the state, uses incomprehensible words to keep the thought of rebellion and freedom out of the minds of the people. For example, they remove all of the alternative words for things so that there is only one word you can use for each situation. This makes innovative thinking impossible, because people can't imagine anything different from what they know, so they are less likely to rebel. Thinking against the party is called 'thoughtcrimes’; the aim of the party is to eventually acquire complete control over people's thoughts so that

According to Socrates the human nature is to be ignorant because in the text of Allegory of the Cave it states, “in the world of knowledge the idea of good appears last of all and is seen only with effort”. (35) This excerpt explains that the humans would rather sit in comfort and not make the effort to gain more knowledge than what they have; which puts them in the chains of ignorance. The Allegory has many types and shadows of reality within its text giving readers room to interpret, inside its parameters of thought. Both the Novel and the Allegory can also be interpreted as a warning for this modern

George Orwell’s novel 1984 created a controversy between society and the government. In his book the government robs society of free will, privacy and truth. It caused the people to think that our society is similar to 1984. Public speakers continue to stress the government, pointing out that they are violating our civil rights; speakers such as Glenn Greenwald, and Noam Chomsky,. People are left to wonder if they really do have civil liberties.

Throughout the novel “1984”, George Orwell specifies how thought relies on the establishment of language. In a totalitarian government, freedom hardly exists. The ideals of a totalitarian government prohibit citizens’ ability to think for themselves, leaving those who comply with the law to believe whatever their dictator does. Analyzing the recurring theme of the totalitarian government in London and its media abusing the power that language withholds, Orwell proves that language integrates into politics to deceive and wrongly influence people, thus leading to a society in which citizens unquestioningly carry out the duties of their government and mindlessly accept all propaganda as truth. Consequently, Big Brother, the dictator of London,

Rhetoric consists of writing or persuasive speaking in which it uses specific and figure of speech to create a notable technique. Rhetoric is almost in every example of everyday routine and writing. If there was a “wrong way” to it, then it would be considered poor usage. In George Orwell’s article, he often criticize and identify the poor features in our modern writing using mainly logical fallacies. Rhetoric can be used in most situations even if only the basic characteristics are being utlilzed. Orwell used hasty generaliztion in his diccussion about the authors and their writing skills. In his pursuit to examine and point out the unsatisfactory quality in our language, he often had a hypocritical output on the article whether is was intentional

One of the most controversial topics in the world is politics. George Orwell expresses this thought by saying, “In our age there is no such thing as “keeping out of politics.” All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia.” Politics are very prevalent in every human’s life. Many times politicians can formulate and manufacture lies in order to make them seem true. Even the slightest issues in everyday life can be connected back to politics. In many cases, people’s thoughts, opinions, and actions are influenced by the political scene. I believe that Orwell’s claim is supported through examples and ideas conveyed by many authors in their writings.

Distortion is notably used in several works of literary merit, mostly to focus people on a specific societal corruption. By twisting, exaggerating, and changing details and making it different from what it is, authors are able to force readers to judge things that we come to realize are actually reality. Therefore, we are judging our own actions as a society by seeing these views from a different perspective. Distortion is used constantly throughout George Orwell’s novel, 1984, which emphasizes social problems such government control. Distortion is more efficient as a literary device than literary realism would be because by changing and exaggerating certain elements of our actual society, Orwell is able to call attention and reform to the realities to the world in which we live in. Literary realism can be defined as the faithful representation of reality. This is scarcely used in 1984 as it might not have contributed to the effectiveness of the work.

1984 by George Orwell is an analysis on the importance of language in the formulation of thought. The book starts of with the line “It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks struck thirteen,” establishing from the start that the government in charge has manipulated all aspects of society, even time itself (Orwell 1). The regime in power-Big Brother’s governments-is authoritarian, forcing propaganda at every turn and controlling, however its worst crime is not disappearing its people and subjecting them to torture, but preventing its citizens from thinking free, original, and complex thoughts through the enforcement of Newspeak. Newspeak purpose was to “narrow the range of thought” by narrowing the range of vocabulary and as result eliminate

George Orwell’s article “Politics and the English Language” gives six rules that authors should follow by to be good writers. After reading the article, one notices how often these rules are broken by authors all the time. George Orwell’s article makes readers question whether or not an author knows how to dictate their own thoughts. By breaking Orwell’s rules, an author loses attachment with a reader, and therefore will be unable to convey their message successfully.

I remember ninth grade English when I wrote basically whatever I wanted and got A’s. It was such an amazing time to be alive. I rarely had to worry about major writing conventions or anything. However, if I could go back, I would tell myself two things, first that I need to learn what a comma is (this is exhibited in all of my writing), and secondly that I shouldn’t write fluff pieces. Young me would have probably looked current me straight in the eyes and would have said, “yeah, but the word count requirement.” Foiled again by the rubric. However, in all seriousness, George Orwell brings up a good point about the current state of the English language in his essay, “Politics and The English Language.” It is no mystery that no current English