Poor Law Amendment Act Research Paper

The Townshend Acts started about 1767. This Act stated that any any British soldiers or tax collectors could search anything the colonists owned such as; boats, warehouses, farms, and homes to see if there was any smuggled/ stolen goods. The warrants also said that the officers could take anything the colonists owned, that they thought was stolen or smuggled.

The American constitution recognizes the right to keep arms for defense of person and property as a privilege or immunity that cannot be abridged by the states. The Glucksberg test recognizes the right to keep arms for defense of person and property as a privilege or immunity that cannot be abridged by the states. The 2nd Amendment is unnecessary for applying this right to the states through the Privileges or Immunities Clause. 1: The Right to keep and Bear Arms in Defense of Person and Property Is Deeply Rooted in our Nation’s History and Tradition. Glucksberg Step 2: Describing the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Defense of Person and Property. Knowing we have the right to own guns is important to those who stand with the 2nd Amendment. If owing a gun makes you feel

Different attitudes to social welfare reforms from the 19th century onwards depended on what lifestyle a person was living in. If a person was wealthy, they enjoyed an easy life. However, on the other hand, if the person was poor then that would make their life harder and difficult to live. Any able-bodied poor person able to work did not receive help from the authorities. They only entered the workhouse because they were desperate. People within the workhouses lived in terrible conditions, overcrowded, poor hygiene. Another name given to the workhouse was ‘’the slums’’ (Tom, 2016). Strict rules were put into place. If rules were broken severe punishment would follow. Inmates of the workhouse were treated harshly. They all worked long hours

The 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act eradicated the previous systems of relief offered to the poor in Victorian England before 1834. This legislation was written up and passed with relatively little difficulty and a lot of parliamentary support. The gist of the amendment was to decrease the amount of impoverished citizens. This was the ultimate goal without providing any actual help for the poor themselves. The 1834 amendment reformed poor laws across the country while also establishing a wide network of workhouses as was fashioned in the amendment.

Indiana has approved House Bill 1337 which protects fetuses from being aborted once they are diagnosed with Down Syndrome inside the womb.

The United States Constitution is the highest law of the land. Looking at the constitution, with twenty-seven amendment, the first ten are known as the Bill of Right. One to eight amendments ensured the right of the people. Although the thirteen amendment abolished slavery, it paved the way for the 14th the most important amendment to be drafted and adopted in 1868.

What is something that everyone does not like? It is a simple yet problematic word: tax. Tax has caused minor and major struggles throughout the years all the way back to the Revolutionary War. Unlike most of today’s modern taxes such as sales tax and property tax, the poll tax was more than just about money; it was about separation of classes, races, and voting rights (“The 24th Amendment”). The twenty-fourth amendment is a lesser known amendment, but it still has a large importance in eliminating this pesky poll tax and giving all United States’ citizens true suffrage.

In 1834 the Poor Law act amendment was made whereby the poor were to follow the new order discipline. Workhouse conditions were reduced to be worse than the lowest paid jobs to discourage requests for help. Regardless of these conditions numbers within workhouses more than doubled by 1843 (Kirby et al., 2000).

If I were capable to travel back in time to the constitutional convention and argue for a change, I would argue that the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendment should be higher up in the constitution near the first amendment. This is because of all of the discrimination that we are still having today in society. If we have these amendments first it would mean that everyone is equal and have the same freedoms. This is a problem in today’s society; even though everyone is equal, African Americans still believe that they are truly not equal.

What is a better way to explain Amendment eight? Then to give an example, you might already deal with it. Amendment eight deals a lot with the courts, bails, fines, punishments. By law some excessive bails are not required in some case. But more the less, A citizen it is reasonable for any of the fine, bail and any punishment they give you. Amendment ninth pertained to the federal courts only. The amendment ninth it was written into the bill of rights to protect ourselves (citizens) from a government that just uses their power for no good. Over the year’s amendment ninth has been one of the heard the most. The tenth amendment is about power. I’ll give you an example; amendment tenth gives power to the United State or to the people. Amendment

When I first looked at the list of topics given to us for this research paper, I noticed that many of them were about the government here in California. My first reaction was to cross those topics off. I wasn’t born and raised in California, so how could I write about ways to fix our government here. Then I realized maybe an outside opinion is just what California needs. My opinion is unbiased and based entirely on research because I had little knowledge before going through the research process. After learning more about the subject, I believe that Proposition 13 should be amended in a couple different ways. The first, by changing the two-thirds majority vote that is currently required to raise the tax rate,

The rise of the movement to pass the Equal Rights Amendment was when the amendment

responded by forming committees in the House and Senate to study and debate the issue.

This report is based upon the information found in history books, the internet and other source regarding the Administration of Justice Act. It all began in May 20,1774. The British Parliament passed a law that stated “Authorized the governor of Massachusetts to move the trials of royal officials accused of committing capital offenses, while performing their natural duties, to another colony or Great Britain, if he believed he would not find a fair trial in Massachusetts.” (American History Central). This happened after the Boston Tea Party so the colonial people and the British had very negative feeling toward each other. Many thought this act was unfair and most acts covered all or most of the colonies but this one only applied to Massachusetts. This act was also

It was felt that there should be a national system of workhouses, with uniform rules and regulations and a central authority in control. This would mean that there would be no advantage to the person in moving from parish to parish. The commission adopted a principle of ‘Less Eligibility” which meant that the conditions of the workhouses should be worse than the conditions of the poorest ‘free’ labourer. The commission also recommended ‘The Workhouse Test’ which meant that outdoor relief, which was payment made to people living in their own homes would be abolished and that relief would only be available in the workhouses,. It was felt that the reformed workhouses should be so uninviting that you would only want to be in one if you could not cope with living in the outside world. Finally, it was felt that the workhouses should not be mixed, but instead there should be separate provisions for men and women. The Poor Law Amendment Act was implemented in 1834 yet it was felt that not all of the changes should be implemented straight away. The banning of outdoor relief began only in the parishes were it was felt implementation would be easiest and was not completely banned until 1840.