Poor Sick And Promed : Article Analysis

Money plays a huge role in access, therefore it is a vital issue to discuss. Within the current system, lack of money results in lack of health care, which leaves thousands of people without any health care coverage. Between 2001 and 2005, the number of people paying for health insurance increased 30%, however income only raised 3% (Health Care Problems). Adequate income is a necessity and unfortunately that is not present. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the average annual premium across the country is $16,000. Currently, the average annual income in the United States is $51,107. Mint Money Management suggests that about 4-6% of one’s total income should be spent on insurance, including life, disability, and health insurance. However, the averages in the United States show that the average person spends about 31% of their income on health insurance, which is not financially beneficial. When this rise in health insurance is not parallel to the inflation of income, innocent people are left without a method to achieve health care. There is a program for those who can’t afford health insurance out of pocket nor have access to it, and that is called Medicaid. Issues still exist with the program. There is only so much funding, which leaves many still uninsured. Additionally, people with Medicaid have difficulty

The purpose of this paper is to give an overview of two federally and/or state funded programs. The programs that will be discussed are Medicare and Medicaid. In this paper will be information about who receives Medicaid/Medicare, the services offered by these programs, and those long term services that are not.

Those who utilize the Medicaid system range from low income families to the over 65 age group. Within this population is also those who are disabled due to physical or mental problems. This is among the sickliest of our American population. A paper based on a study in Oregon stated that “Medicaid significantly increased the probability of being diagnosed with diabetes, and being on diabetes medication as well as high blood pressure and high cholesterol.”(Baicker et al., 2013, p. 1715). Much of this is due to the struggle that the Medicaid beneficiary has

Throughout the early 1980’s and 1990’s the Federal Medicaid program was challenged by rapidly rising Medicaid program costs and an increasing number of uninsured population. One of the primary reasons for the overall increase in healthcare costs is the

As a health policy analyst for the state of Texas which has not elected to expand Medicaid as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and now has been notified that the state leaders have taking into reconsideration their recent decision during an upcoming session in order that we begin gathering data on the benefits of adapting the Medicaid expansion. As a health policy analyst our goal is to assure data quality, interpret data, and discover new information in the data. Medicaid is a federal and state partnership with shared authority that is a health insurance program for low-income individuals, children, their parents, the people with disabilities and the elderly. Nationally Medicaid covers health care for over 72 million people. Even though participation is optional, all 50 states participate in the Medicaid program. However, Medicaid benefits eligibility varies widely among the states all states must meet federal minimum requirements, but they have options for expanding Medicaid beyond the minimum federal guideline (http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/affordable-care-act-expansion.aspx). In this research we will identify the state of interest which is Texas, compare the state’s decision, determine the alternate approaches to expanding access and provide a recommendation on whether or not the state should opt in to the Medicaid expansion.

One of the most controversial issues in politics today is healthcare, specifically ObamaCare, also known as Affordable Care Act (ACA), which has effectively insured millions of low-income American households. Under the ObamaCare, Medicaid has been expanded to states that want to participate. It plays an exceptionally crucial role in the healthcare coverage, and access for rural communities as they are more likely to “be poorer, less likely to have insurance, and less intense users of medical services overall” (Richards et al., 2016, p. 573). A study conducted by the Health Services Research found that Medicaid patients received appointments nearly 80% of the time in rural areas, but only 60% in nonrural areas (Richards et al., 2016, p. 570).

On February 16th, Speaker Paul Ryan, several House committee members, and Secretary Tom Price presented their outline for the plan set to replace the Affordable Care Act that would rely heavily on tax credits, yet according to The New York Times, would also drastically change the future of state Medicaid programs. According to Five Thirty Eight, Obamacare strived to expand Medicaid to all adults with incomes below 138 percent of the poverty level. This meant adding more than seventy million people to a program that already accounts for more than a quarter of all state budgets combined and half of all federal money that is routed to states. Republicans hope to cap and lower these costs by entirely changing the purpose of Medicaid, a Great Society

The purpose of this paper is to thoroughly examine the similarities and differences of Medicare and Medicaid managed care plans by comparing and contrasting its strengths, weaknesses, incentives, commitment to access, and risks to the consumer. Medicaid and Medicare are both health insurance programs financed and administered by government entities and are both equivalent in terms of the number of beneficiaries and total expenditures (McCarthy, Schafermeyer, & Plake, 2011). These healthcare programs differ in terms of how they are funded and governed and who they cover. Medicare is an important source of coverage for 65 or older adults, for people under 65 with disabilities, and for people of all ages with End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. It provides health insurance protection and enables access to medical care for 54 million beneficiaries.

The article summarizes on how the Medicaid has expanded to the state that it wasn’t non-existent such as New York through the provision of the statistics of the beneficiaries. The author focuses on the measurement of the quality of the Medicaid which deteriorates at an alarming rate leading to a greater future concern on the medical coverage on the patients in the Medicaid program. The article also emphasizes on the reports by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services which presented poor quality of the services offered as a result of the Medicaid. For instance, the existence of low- birth weight babies, patient’s satisfaction and body mass indexes. The authors further states that, for the future success of the Medicaid on the poor and the sick, there should be a balance on the quality and financial savings and the close monitor of the adverse impacts which can arise as a result of lack of proper procedures in the Medicaid program. Therefore,

In today’s world, the one item that is constantly brought up between State and Federal Governments is the expansion of Medicaid in response to Obamacare. Many states are willing to accept the expansion of their Medicaid programs, while others turn the expansion down. In fact in 2010 when the healthcare reform law, commonly known as Obamacare, came forth only 18 states opted to accept the Medicaid expansion, along with other federal initiatives, while 14 completely refused all of the Medicaid expansions, and federal initiatives (Posner & Conlan 2014, 7). So in response to this theme that has been read about, and brought up in this class within the last few weeks, I chose a survey question on whether or not people think their state should accept the expansion of their states Medicaid program.

The article that I selected for this week’s review focuses on the reaction of hospitals over the most recent draft of the GOP healthcare bill, The Better Care Reconciliation Act. The bill stands to generate major cuts to Medicaid funding. The bill, which was just released today, is already drawing up skepticism and opposition by hospital groups. Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the American Hospital Association, stated, “If enacted, the Better Care Reconciliation Act would mean real consequences for real people — among them people with chronic conditions such as cancer, individuals with disabilities who need long-term services and support, and the elderly" (Leonard, 2017). Those who are in most need of healthcare services and are on Medicaid

Medicaid is a cooperative program administered by federal and provincial government that insures individuals with chronic illness or disabilities who could not have had the means to obtain insurance elsewhere. However, Medicaid’s ability to run efficiently has started to be questioned due to growing budget pressure. This program is need of improvement, so it can benefit both the people and the country. Medicare faces its challenges too, as the population of elderly grows, so does the cost of the program. The coverage of Medicare is also questionable. The government covers about 60% of the medical expenses under Medicare, however 15% of Medicare recipients are so indigent that they would be entitled to Medicaid. Money is also the problem for

Throughout the early 1980’s and 1990’s the Federal Medicaid program was challenged by rapidly rising Medicaid program costs and an increasing number of uninsured population. One of the primary reasons for the overall increase in healthcare costs is the over

Michener describes this geographical inequality of Medicaid as a “product of political choices and resource allocation”. She argues that decisions to allow economic inequality continually spiral out of control render resources devoted Medicaid less effective. She notes that the tendency to avoid big government has led to poor treatment of Medicaid beneficiaries because “States often fail to equip counties to effectively administer Medicaid, and again this leads to poorer health

Medicare and Medicaid are extremely vital programs of the US healthcare system, that together cover for approximately 105 million people in 2016 (“Health Insurance Coverage of the Total Population,” n.p.). However, these programs are diametrically different and represent dyadic thought processes which are nebulous and riddled with contradictions. This aberrant situation provides great insight into the nature of healthcare policymaking in America. It illustrates that healthcare policymaking has a very partisan practice and is constantly influenced by third-party agendas. Additionally, it also depicts that healthcare policymaking in America has perennially played a gap-filling role.