Popularization Of Resistance Training

The biological value in whey protein enhances the body’s ability to absorb essential amino acids after resistance training decreasing the athlete’s recovery time. When athletes combine whey protein and creatine monohydrate they expect “a greater increase in lean tissue mass and muscular strength than supplementations with whey protein alone” (Burke, Chilibeck, Davison, Candow, Farthing, & Smith-Palmer 2001, p 350). Exogenous Cr supplementation increases the body’s Cr levels until saturation occurs. This saturation of Cr increases the PCK shuttle continuum allowing training intensity, volume, and duration of the exercise the athlete is performing to continue at a maximum rate. Any excess Cr in the blood is cleared through sweat, urination or renal filtration. Measurements in strength and peak torques of athletes supplementing with whey protein and creatine monohydrate (WC), whey protein (W), and a placebo (P) were taken. According to Burke et al, (2001) “repeated measure analysis of variance was used to assess changes in body composition, strength, and peak torque for the three groups (WC vs. W vs. P) across time” (p. 354). A twelve week strength training program was constructed and consisted of a “4-day split routine involving whole body musculature” (Burke et al, 2001. p 352). Subjects used detailed training logs to compare progress over the 12 week experiment. The end result from this experiment shows that subjects who “supplemented with both creatine and whey

They measured muscular strength and anaerobic performance in trained athletes. 17 physically, active young men were selected for the study and the creatine group had 8 people and the placebo group had 9 people with average age of 23 and 26, respectively. The creatine group took 20 grams a day over the course of 4 servings and the placebo group received a carbohydrate mixture and both groups took it before meals. They trained on day 1 and 4, which included exercises that the whole body. They measured anaerobic power on a 30 second Wingate test, max bench press and squat, took blood and urine samples, and measured height, weight, and body fat. Using an ANOVA with repeated measures across time, the results demonstrated that there was an increase in anaerobic force (12%) and back squat quality (11%) when contrasted with the placebo group. With more creatine in the body than with the control group and the creatine group had lower body fat but more body weight because of increased muscle mass. Proper training and creatine led to power and force increases for these athletes, which is helpful to a running back in improving power, speed, and game

Periodized heavy resistance training was performed for 12 wk. Creatine or placebo capsules were consumed 25 grams per day for 1 wk followed by a maintenance dose of 5 grams per day for the remainder of the training. RESULTS: After 12 wk, significant increases in body mass and fat-free mass were greater in creatine than placebo subjects. After 12 wks, increases in bench press and squat were greater in creatine subjects. Compared with placebo subjects, creatine subjects demonstrated significantly greater increases in muscle total, creatine concentrations were unchanged in placebo subjects. Muscle creatine was significantly elevated after 1 wk in creatine subjects (22%), and values remained significantly greater than placebo subjects after 12 wk. Average volume lifted in the bench press during training was significantly greater in creatine subjects during weeks 5-8. No negative side effects to the supplementation were reported. CONCLUSION: Creatine supplementation enhanced fat-free mass, physical performance, and muscle morphology in response to heavy resistance training, presumably mediated via higher quality training sessions. This study was conducted by Richard B. Kreider of the Exercise & Sport Nutrition Laboratory Department of Human Movement Sciences and Education The University of Memphis. The one concern I have with this study is it seemed to leave out the limitations that Creatine may have on some body

For example many people will show an improvement in strength from the first session to the second session. This improvement is due to CNS adaptation because there is no hypertrophic gain during this short period. Another example which proves the importance of CNS adaptations related to strength gains is that strength performance may increase by 30% while hypertrophic gains may only be 15%, thus half of the strength gains is attributable to CNS adaptations. Generally in the first few months of strength training CNS adaptations account for a larger percentage of the strength gain than hypertrophic adaptations. To illustrate the importance of CNS adaptations in the early part of training, it should be noted that electrical stimulation can increase the rate of strength gains. Hypertrophy is an important factor in improved strength performance. Strength training brings about an increase in the size and number of myofibrils. It is speculated that during and following a high intensity strength training session the neuroendocrine responses will bring about an increased amino acid uptake and will increase the rate of protein synthesis. Optimal hypertrophic gains require adequate recovery between workouts to permit the rate of protein synthesis to exceed the rate of protein degradation. It should also be noted that strength training also stimulates bone and

They discuss a few different studies that have been down, one of which was done by adding protein to a carbohydrate sports drink. In this study cyclists were given the carbohydrate sports drink, a placebo or the carbohydrate sports drink spiked with protein. In this study it was found that there was no benefit to having the additional protein in the drink during exercise. And although there have been studies with opposite results, they have yet to replicated (Gibala). They also discuss the importance of athletes finding receiving the best information when they are conducting their own research when it comes to protein. They suggest that athletes find credible sources when using the Internet and/or finding a certified

The next question that needs to be asked is what happens to protein after exercise. In the previous section, it was discussed that there is protein synthesis and protein breakdown and it is controlled by glycogen. In a review article Tipton and Wolfe (2001), explain there are three factors that play a role in protein synthesis: type of exercise performed, intensity, and condition. The goal of training is to get better so understanding the best way to stimulate protein synthesis is important. In resistance training, this is important because protein helps rebuild the

The endurance of exercise performance could be limited by the availability of muscle glycogen (Roberts PA1 2016).

How ever there was a huge change in food intake after participants engaged in High Intensity Exercise. There was a difference shown with a significance of (P<.05). This helped the researchers come to the conclusion that High Intensity workouts are beneficial for the 24 hour energy balance. However it found that these effects usually don’t carry over into the next day. It also showed that while the consumption levels fell the types of food which they consumed did not change

Objective: To determent whether, when protein intake was at least 20 g at each meal, the consumption of a isocaloric high protein diet rich in dairy protein would provide greater increases in muscle strength, lean mass and physical function compared with either an isocaloric diet representative of the typical Australian dietary protein intake (i.e. ~1.1 g/kg/d) or an isocaloric diet high in non-dairy (i.e. soy) protein in older adults undertaking a program of resistance training.

A double-blind study was performed, in order to determine whether health young men performing prolonged resistance-typed exercise training would have increased muscle mass and strength when protein supplements were consumed before sleeping. Forty-one health young men participated in a supervised progressive resistance-typed exercise training, which were performed three times a week for a total of twelve weeks. In addition, the participants were required to consume a bottle consisting of either a protein or noncaloric placebo drink prior to sleeping on a daily basis. To prevent any bias in the results, the bottled beverages were masked for taste, smell and color and distributed randomly to each participant. The impact of the study was assessed based on the before and after measurements of body composition, muscle fiber type composition, muscle

- Now it is well known that long term resistance training (RT) has a significant benefits on health.

In one experiment, to determine the effects of BCAAs during a workout, the use of BCAAs and carbohydrates were implemented see if the combination had any positive effect on gene expression in muscles after a workout (4). College-aged males were given random mixtures of the BCAAs and carbohydrates and other workout supplements, and then told to perform resistance exercises led to results that were found to be inconclusive and that the levels of the genes being tested for, had no significant results with p-values greater than 0.05 in most of the genes that they had tested after the use of the pre-workout supplements had been taken (4). For this experiment, it was hypothesized that the consumption of BCAAs would significantly impact muscle contraction while performing simple arm movements. This idea also stems from related work done

Training frequency is one of the most misunderstood variables by athletes aiming to improve muscle strength and size. Many athletes believe that training any body part more than once or twice per week will result in overtraining and muscle loss. This type of black and white thinking can be a limiting factor in an athletes’ development. In fact, there is a growing body of evidence showing a greater benefit to increased training frequency when used correctly.

What evidence is there to support or disprove claims that high intake levels of protein help build muscle mass and better athletes? Muscles are made mostly of protein, so logically one would think that the more protein in the diet, the more muscle one should have. Certain types of exercise, weight lifting for example, do stimulate muscle growth. So, a combination of weight training and large amounts (the more, the better) should be beneficial, right? Not exactly. The most recent indications are that dietary protein in excess of the current recommended dietary allowance (0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day) is likely needed for optimal muscle growth (5.) "The current recommended dietary allowance doesn't seem to be

Certain aspects of training programs can be manipulated by changing the environment and exercise. For example, some athletes may incorporate extreme environments and strength training sessions into their training regime to improve their endurance. In addition to exercise, an athlete may alter their diet to achieve higher energy levels and speedier recoveries. A distance runner may fuel up with carbohydrates before a marathon to have a reasonable glycogen storage in the liver. Alternatively, a body builder will ingest high amounts of protein after a training session to help build muscle and quicken recovery. Because of contrasting nutritional needs and training, the physical composition of athletes may vary. According to Burke and Cox (2010), distance runners tend to have a slimmer build, with little overall body fat. In comparison, body builders have prominent, sculpted muscles with fluctuating body fat levels. Consequently, personalized nutritional needs and training has made it easier for athletes to obtain a physique capable of achieving their sport.