According to Sigmund Freud humans must repress their base desires and freedoms in order to adapt to society, thus taking away happiness. This could since a functioning society’s main goal is to increase its population as rapidly as possible, so that more work can be done so that more people can be born and so on, and it achieves this goal in one main. The main way it does this is by protecting its citizens from threats, internal and external, which would harm the population causing a decrease in the potential population. Which end up restricting the population. People must reduce their aggression if they wish to be efficient in society. Society could not work if large portion of the members of society were murdering continually. If a large portion of people were murdering continuously then it can be expected that a good portion of the population would die causing a decrease in the society's productivity. If a decent portion of the population gets murdered then in the next generation there won't be more people leading to stagnant productivity. Or If a decent portion of people get killed in the society then the society fails at its purpose which is to offer protection not only that, bu usually exchange for the freedom of the people so that people may reproduce. Most people can not help society if they are busy torturing people this is the case since torturing takes time and effort in order to properly pull off and for society to be productive it needs people to work which also takes time and effort which means that most people can’t torture and work all while getting appropriate amounts of sleep and food. And if people were torturing others then a lot of people are not being as productive as possible thereby reducing the productivity of the population while harming it. Not only that, but then there are the effects of the torture. If people are torturing people by physical or chemical pain then there are chances of death, sickness, physical or mental, or debilitating injuries, some of which could cause sterility, and all of this can lower productivity and go against the main propose of society. Some Societies make it practically impossible to be a member after being to aggressive. This happens since people don’t
Throughout the last few hundred years, humans have built a foundation. Compared to all of the other animal species on Earth, humans are the most intelligent. We have built houses everywhere, developed a system to sustain ourselves, and now inhabit almost every piece of land on earth. Humans are smart, strong, and know how to fend for themselves. But, humans have a tendency to take it too far, and we have already done so. There have been numerous advancements over the past few hundred years which could ultimately lead to the downfall of the human race. The main issue is overpopulation due to the advancements in technology and general knowledge. The statistics from an article by Kenneth Smail show that “In the year 1900, there were almost 2 billion humans living on Earth. Throughout the 1960’s, the baby boom, there were 3 billion humans on Earth. Today in 2016, there are just over 7 billion humans living on Earth.” Currently, we have taken up just over half of all available land on this planet, and with increased amounts of people having kids, our population will only increase. Overpopulation is becoming a serious problem all around the world, especially in countries such as China and India. There are many global problems associated with overpopulation that are becoming more and more prevalent, which will all have dangerous effects on the foundation that humans have
According to Freud, civilization is against happiness because of the conflict between the state of nature and the state of society. Freud believed human nature was to be aggressive and sexual all the time (the id) and society is what controls us and makes us suppress these urges (superego). This conflict between our innate animalistic urges and society’s control, according to Freud, leads to discontentment and unhappiness. Although civilization leads to us mastering our id, Freud would argue that we are not ok with it and therefore are not happy.
Population in the world is growing rapidly and civilians don’t realize the consequences of having too many people in this world. Just a few of the consequences are, homeless people, food shortages, and unemployment. With an increase of people, resources are quickly being used up. Should America try to mimic China’s population control law that couples are only allowed up to two children? Population control will help the world because it will eliminate food shortages, reduce the amount of trash, and stabilize the economy.
Our world has grown and evolved for millions of years. In the past, there was a time when offspring was needed to continue our legacy, but with many factors involved that changed. The chaos caused by the government: poverty, injustice, death, illness, a decrease of necessary resources, and a reduced mortality rate, which came with the improvement of medical facilities are only some of the factors that created change from the past to the present. The factor that had the most impact on today's society is immigration. People from many different countries came to one single country, this being our home, America. We are in the youngest country of all, and our image as a country portrays a place where opportunities are given to every family and individual
The problem that we are having here is rapid human population growth and without a doubt there is a problem with this in today’s society. This type of problem is a very complex issue. You see a lot of rapid population growth more so, in other countries and your are seeing it more and more in the U.S. it is linked to many problems, including poverty, hunger, high infant mortality, and inadequacies in social services, health services, and infrastructure. It would be a gross oversimplification to say that population growth causes these problems. Population growth could just as easily have been the effect of economic insecurity and poor health care. However, rapid population growth may defeat efforts to combat poverty and hunger and to improve
In the first part of the book, the author talks about how we are changing our relationship with the world, and these changes that the author discusses potentially widened our ingenuity gap. The ingenuity gap, is between our supply and requirement for ingenuity. Population increasing, meso scale, and emergent properties, they are the changes that people made to this world. However, how these changes widen our ingenuity gap? Population increasing has a big effect on society, environment and natural resources. Through them, population can make a huge influence on ingenuity gap; meso scale makes us unable to see the outside world and we cannot come up with the new ideal; emergent properties make the problem more complex, so it is becoming more
In society we experience a lot of problems that could have devastating effect on our planet and our society. These problems can range anywhere from pollution, to dictatorships, to even over population; if these problems are not controlled they could end up to the destruction of the world or possibly even a dystopian society. We as a society take these real world possibilities into consideration and look for the outcome in the form of literature. We imagine all the possibilities of an extraordinary event or catastrophe happening that if, or when, the time comes the people of our planet will be prepared. Although we try to be prepared by imagining all situations that could possibly happen, literature cannot explain how to fix the problem but
Imagine this, a dystopian society where the ground, everywhere, is black with asphalt, because all the forests have been cut down and houses cover the area. Inevitably, all animals have become extinct because their homes have been destroyed and the demanding population has consumed all natural resources. The only thing in abundance, mankind. The crowded streets swarming with people every second of the day and the overpopulated world itself seem like frivolous problems now, however, it is the unrivaled cause of everything. This problem must be solved, and the only way to do so, is for the government to enact new laws and regulations.
In his work, Civilization and Disobedience, Sigmund Freud assesses that civilization and its individuals overall aim is to be happy. Throughout his work, Freud often points out the differences and disagreements that come about between the two. These disagreements often arise due to the limitations that are set on man both by himself and by the civilization of which he is part. This work was published in the 1930s, which is considered to be the Great Depression Era, otherwise known as the time between World War I and World War II. In his work, Freud often describes man as striving to have a happy life, but is often unsuccessful due to civilization and mans own aggression. In man’s strive to happy Freud also introduces his theory of instincts that give a person more insight as to what is going on in a person’s psyche and how they can become happier people. Sigmund Freud’s overall message was that happiness cannot be fully fulfilled due to civilization itself and everybody being individualistic and having a different idea of happiness.
For this assignment you will select one, specific ethical issue related to population issues or environmental issues that you learned about from Unit 6 Reading Assignments, and that you also found interesting.
People are constantly searching for more. More money, more power, more resources, whatever it may be. It seems that no one talks the time to reflect on what they have before the go searching for more. A catalyst of this is technology increasing so rapidly. We constantly “need” the newest and best thing. People are constantly trying to figure out how to obtain more money and material goods. We have created a society so fixated on instant gratification that we don't even realize how we are behaving. In the literature we have read and in my observation of society, happiness seems almost unreachable. Happiness is made to be about completing objectives, material or not, but once those objectives are met, they still aren’t happy. We seem to try to fill the void of happiness with material goods or relationships with others, and this has not changed for hundreds of years. Big businesses are obsessed with saving money, time or work in any way possible, turning a blind eye to anyone being negatively affected by these decisions.The earth is being destroyed because humans “need” more land, stores, houses, fill in the blank. We are not thinking of the effects that we have on the animals in these habitats or the generations that will come after us. It is the same mentality that has gone on for years of “why should I try to change it? It is not affecting me!” Just as the characters in these stories we feel so superior to, we do not take into consideration how anyone or anything is feeling but
Population control is “a policy of attempting to limit the growth in numbers of a population” (dictionary.com). Kurt Vonnegut writes about a time when the United States population is stable at forty-million people. In order for them to stay at the same amount of people they take a life for every new life. A situation as the one illustrated in the story would bring out human instincts in a negative way. That is why this form of population control is a horrible idea because as humans we have the instinct to do all we can for those we love and to survive. In all reality, the universe has its own natural way of controlling the population and that’s all that we need.
The overpopulation of the human race is killing the earth due to the consumption of natural resources and not taking care of our planet. The human race as of the twenty-first century is similar to a parasite. Humans consume everything we can and do not help those resources grow back. The human race is also driving animals out of their habitats, taking over those habitats and in that process putting more animals on the endangered species index. The human population needs to be reduced in order to try to save earth or so the next planet humans move to does not end up like earth.
Public health is becoming now, more than ever a subject of societal concern. Public health scares such as SARS and the Swine Flu might be the first thing that people think of when they hear the words "public health" but the reality is that more common conditions are the things which drain the public health sector in a more profound and debilitating manner. These are conditions like adult and childhood obesity, lung cancer from smoking, diabetes, and comparable conditions. Just as Glasgow and colleagues stress the importance of a multi-level approach when addressing these public health concerns so that one can address: " …supportive and inhibitory social-environmental factors at multiple levels (personal, family, health care team, work, neighborhood, community). Key disciplines contributing to a population-based approach to diabetes include epidemiology, behavioral science, health care services, public health, health economics, and quality of life professions" (1999). Thus, when it comes to approaching public health from a population based management approach, a range of factors come into play that leaders in the health care industry need to be aware of in order to make a real impact. Thus, this paper will examine the most powerful tools in population based management factors for the good of public health; they are: supportive social-environmental strategies, supportive behavioral strategies, terrorism awareness and
Population control is an idea that has been thrown around world-wide for years. One may wonder what population control would even mean for its partakers. As one researches population control, many different viewpoints are found. There are the viewpoints of those who are oblivious to the struggles an economy will be forced to face if population control is not put into effect; then, there are others who recognize the responsibility they have to care for their country the way it has cared for them for centuries. Without population control, not only will the economy fail, but there will be world-wide struggles. These struggles seem unfathomable at America’s current peak of economic success; however, soon they will be a reality if one does not take action quickly.