Porphyria's Lover And My Last Duchess Essay

communicates two interpretations concerning Both poems describe the behavior of people who are in loving, romantic relationships. There are several aspects common in both poems. Using the literary technique of dramatic dialogue, the author reveals the plot and central idea of each poem. Robert Browning tells each poetic story through a single speaker. Both poems reveal an account in which the admirer kills the object of his love. This paper will compare and contrast the following characteristics: the setting, the speaker, the mood and tone, and theme found "My

The poem “My Last Duchess” is a historical event that involves the Duke of Ferrara and Alfonso who lived in the 16th century. Robert Browning "My Last Duchess" presents a narrative about a recently widowed Duke who talks with an emissary had come to an arranged marriage with another lady from a powerful and wealthy family. In the perspective of Duke, power and wealth were integral in marriage and was determined to be married to a wealthy lady from a famous family. As the Duke orients the emissary through the palace, he stops and shows a portrait of the late Duchess who was a lovely and young girl. The Duke then begins by stating information about the picture and then to the Duchess. Duke claims that the Duchess flirted with everyone and did not appreciate the history of the family: “gift of a nine hundred years old name.”(33) However, when an individual continues to read the poem, it is evident that the Duke played an important role in killing the lady. Duke states that “he gave commands; / Then all smiles stopped together”(45-46) he used these words to define the death of his beloved Duchess. The aim of the essay is to analyze literary devices that emphasize the content of the poem, which includes rhetorical questions, exclamation mark, and em dash.

Porphyria’s Lover and The Laboratory “Porphyria’s Lover” and “The Laboratory” both deal with crimes of passion. Explore ways Browning explains ways of obsessive nature of his character and analysis the effects of literary techniques. “Porphyria’s Lover” is a poem about a crime and passion. Porphyria is a young, wealthy girl who seems to have abandoned her family’s tradition of choosing wealthy men as lovers. Her lover remains anonymous, this could be because he has murdered her and does not want his name releasing.

Porphyria's Lover also demonstrates several of Robert Browning's defining characteristics as a poet. It contains his criticism towards the beliefs and practices of self-restraint and his traditional use of dramatic monologue to expose a single character's personality, which in turn often provides an additional depth to his works in coordination with his use of unpoetic language. Also taking into account the author's own personal experiences with his wife, the poem can also be perceived as a representation of the development of their relationship. Browning's criticism of the idea of self-restraint is evident throughout the poem "Porphyria's Lover" as it was shown in the internal debates both characters underwent as they decided whether or not they should consummate the love between them.

“My Last Duchess” and “Porphyria’s Lover” are two poems that go together in many ways. For instance, Robert Browning wrote both of the poems and the men are very psychotic. The many similarities and differences of the two poems show how women are treated as objects, how the women are killed, and how the men felt about their women. The many similarities in the poems are what connect the two. In both poems, the two men each get jealous very easily.

There are many similarities and differences between these two writings that can be compared. In contrast, Porphyria’s Lover and My Last Duchess are different in one way through the actions of premeditation

Porphyria’s Lover is a disturbing monologue about a man, who’s warped love drives him to strangle his lover, Porphyria, with her own hair. Most of Browning’s narrators are sinister characters, and in this case, the man narrating is believed to have psychosis, which causes him hallucinate and dissociate from reality. The poem’s eeriness can be attributed to the narrator, who adopts a chillingly calm tone that contrasts the horror of the murder. The woman is named after the disease, Porphyria, which was first identified a few years before the poem was written. The disease damages the nervous system and induces madness, alluding to how the man’s lover is the ultimate cause of his mania and unhealthy obsession.

To draw an examination between Porphyrias Lover and My Last Duchess, it is vital to comprehend the consistent theme between these two ballads. Both are sensational monologs in which the beau portrays his story of adoration and distress. While in Porphyrias Lover we

“My Last Duchess”, by Robert Browning, is narrated through dramatic monologue from the perspective of the nonchalant Duke. Through his narration, the reader develops a wanton view of the Duchess, and a sense of superiority that the Duke bestows upon himself. The Duke, consumed by his own superior ego, illustrates the statue of Neptune and the seahorse, and this becomes the most memorable part of the poem. Within the final lines of “My Last Duchess”, the Duke makes note of his statue of Neptune taming a wild seahorse, and how it is cast in bronze.

Initially, Browning uses Pathetic Fallacy to convey her Lover is not only upset but also missing her by witnessing the “rain” and “sullen wind”. Porphyria’s presence changes this as she is presented as a very positive figure as she “glided in” and “shut the cold out” which is symbolic for her acting as warmth by completely changing his negative outlook on life and making a positive impact on his attitude. From the start, it is assumed that Porphyria is a huge part of his Lover’s life as he seems to be almost obsessed with her, “I listened with heart fix to

These stories closely relate to each other while still remaining different. Browning’s monologues are different in Porphyria’s Lover by how he kills his girl, in My

Browning varies in how he describes the fate of the women in his writings. In My Last Duchess, the killing itself is not detailed; truely, it requires a reading between the lines, as it were, to interpret the narrators true meaning. Conversely, in Porphyria’s Lover the act of murder is very blatantly depicted. A pattern begins to emerge in the writing of the two stories: the former being more subtle in nature, the latter being rather literal, even in its

Both of these works contain the unique ability, as portrayed by Browning, to create a deep fictional psyche that displays the strange relationship between man and woman. This relationship is displayed as one full of pain, jealousy, rejection and happiness, the majority of these emotion are contained in love and marriage. From this the reader can infer the nature of love being the conquering of class distinction and marriage involves sexist male inhibitions. Insecurities are seen in both poems and are evident in the perspective voices of the male protagonists, who are seen as incapable to handle their aggressive and possessive natures when it comes to love and marriage. Browning seems to be demonstrating the side of relationships avoided previously by Romantics and in doing so shows the negative implication on seemingly unruly

Robert Browning’s “My Last Duchess” depicts the typical Renaissance man and his peculiarities such as his jealousy and severity as a husband, but also his love for money and art. This essay seeks to demonstrate that ‘love’, ‘marriage’ and ‘death’ are all occurring themes that stand by the principals of this poem. Prior to the beginning of the poem, the word ‘Ferrara’ is thoughtfully placed by the poet in order to assert not only the location, but also the ambience of “My Last Duchess”. Set in Renaissance Italy it is natural to assume that the speaker is an opulent Duke of Ferrara, who has been married many times before, this being explicitly suggested from the very beginning.

The dramatic monologue “My Last Duchess” was penned down by Robert Browning. In this poem, the narrator is the Duke of Ferrara, and the listener is the count’s agent, through whom the Duke is arranging the proposed marriage to a second duchess. The poem is ironical and reveals its rhetorical sense, gradually. In the later part of the poem, the Duke claims that he does not have a skill in speech, but his monologue is a masterpiece of subtle rhetoric. While supposedly entertaining the listener by showing his wife’s portrait, he clearly reveals his character. Through his formalized tone of rhyme, he reveals his egoistic and jealous attitude.