Porphyria's Lover: Compare And Contrast Essay

Before the close reading process of “This Person” by Miranda July I was quite confused on what this short story was ultimately about. As I started to analyse the piece of writing more I began to understand more about what the story was trying to convey, I began to learn more about “this person” that is being spoken about in the story. I feel as though close reading can help you understand a text to the fullest extent, because no matter how difficult a text may be these reading strategies can help clarify anything you may not understand. I know for myself I find it hard to understand what some poetry pieces are trying to convey because in poetry they are presented more figuratively than literally which makes one think, but when using the reading

In this essay I am going to be analysing two poems, 'The Sun Rising' and 'Porphyria's Lover' in order to examine how both texts presented the treatment of women.

While it is easy to say that this poem is simply a frightening and perverse account of a man who cannot properly express his feelings for a woman, it is much more complex. Two major motifs in the poem, love and sin, create a sense of contradiction. Browning uses this contradiction to explore the relationship between art and morality.

"Reading a text as pure description of an object, and undertaken to mechanically memorize the discrimination, it is neither real reading nor does it result in the knowledge of the object to which the text refers" (Freire 284). When a teacher gives a reading assignment, the students that read to memorize the text likely do not gain the significance of what that literary work contextually attempted to deliver, nor is it necessarily understood by the reader. If a student was really taught the significance and meaning of the text instead of mechanically memorizing it, the student should have better outcomes both with gaining the insight of the assignment and the memorization of key points. Mechanistically

This weeks reading, by Corrie Goldman, supports the neuroscientific benefits of a close read by providing readers with preliminary results of a very spesciffic tests. In this research, subjects were asked to read a passage twice, at first they were asked to skim trough it. The second time they were asked to read "closely" as if studying for an exam. Not only were they reading but they were doing so while being scanned by an MRI machine. Results indicated that while both readings increased blood-flow to the brain, the close read had substantial difference, demonstrating that a close read requires the synchronization of various cognitive functions at one time. I support this conclusion, when I "catch" myself skimming trough important information

As a critical reader, I will pre-read all the assignments that will be due for the chapter that I am reading. I will highlight key points in the text so that I can look for it at a glance, and find it quickly. I will read aloud to receive both visual jargons as well as auditory. I will re-read passages when in doubt. I use first precision and sometimes read into all the detail, but I need to use my confluence and look just at the big picture.

However, there were several other clues: her constant promotion of the idea of close reading, her long-winded explanations of the purported benefits that close reading offers, and her expanded discussion on the repercussions of choosing to educate students in close reading. This, combined with the nigh excessive use of the term 'close reading' made her thesis appear in flamboyant prominence, which was likely an effective tool in disseminating information about the process of close reading to her audience. However, the importance of this article lies not in how effective it is in propagating the idea of close reading, but in how many of the claims regarding close reading are

The article that was read was the “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely,” by Stephen Marche. I read it twice to compare and contrast my ways of reading to the stages of reading and the results were pretty similar. With the previewing, to the skimming, to a little of the careful reading, both techniques were very easy to use effectively. There were many things that I liked more about one technique than the other and vice versa. All in all, either technique can work for me for very good reasons.

To read is "to look at and understand the meaning of letters, words, symbols, etc." That is the official definition of the word "read". If we apply this definition to our day-to-day reading, then we barely scratch the surface of a deeper meaning behind what we read. Close reading or the analysis of a text, help us, readers, furthermore understand the texts not just what appear on the surface. By using close reading, we are more aware of how each word are chosen because they may go well together with another word and that would set the mood, tone, and voice for the text. Before knowing about the art of close reading, I always love to read "literary potato chips" as the article mention. I never want to read the same book twice and it was very

By reading to fast you can skip over important details or examples, thereby creating gaps in your understanding that can be very difficult to fill in later. When being critically engaged it’s important to keep a consistent and manageable pace in order to maximize the effectiveness of your reading process. However, pacing is not the only important term. Time management plays the largest role in being able to successfully read and write.

As the reader examines "Prophyria's Lover" by Robert Browning, one recognizes the complete effort of the speaker to disguise his feelings toward the murder of his wife. The speaker goes through different thoughts in relation to the life he has with his wife. Many thoughts include the positive and negative parts about her and their relationship. Throughout the monologue, the speaker tells the readers of his struggles of coming to the conclusion of murdering his wife and the reasons to do so. In “Prophyria’s Lover”, the speaker is faced with many types of insanity before, during, and after the murder of his wife, Prophyria because of the love he has for her.

Life always finds a way to water things down. Whether it be religion, news, or education, we always get the tail end of what is truly going on. So when you find something that is real or someone who is real, it is a rare and splendid occasion. We can finally receive a true, nitty gritty struggle of real life. Just as when Slim Shady came into the so called “rap game”, he wrote songs about how his life was. He held nothing back telling us how it was, is, and will be. He was greeted with displeasure, and many tried to push away his truth. This is what I constantly look for in reading. I look for an honest, raw form of writing that will always bring forth a problem in society's eyes. Any way that it can bring forth a question of, “why?”, or “what is wrong with them?”, that's what I like to see. I only legitimately found such a view or reaction

American author Lloyd Alexander once described reading as “one of the most marvelous adventures that anyone can have.” Throughout my life, I can say with certainty that I’ve always loved to read, and could agree with this quote wholeheartedly. However, when I dove into Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, a book I had been unfamiliar with and expected enjoy, I found more aversions than I did adventure. I was not prepared for often non-sequential storyline, indefinite details, and overall confusion that would hobble my once high hopes for the piece. Yet despite my preliminary dislike, there were certain aspects that impressed me as I plodded through the pages, and perhaps in the end there were just enough praiseworthy components to amend my

The reading passage states that a professional picture portrayed a teenage girl is proved to be Jane Austen. However, the listening holds the opposite view for the following reasons.

“Skimming=Reading quickly for gist of a passage. A typical skimming task would be a general question from the teacher...” (Learning Teaching, Third edition 2005, Jims Scrivener, Macmillan)