Position On The Relationship Of U. S. Technology Companies With China Case Study

For the last twenty eight years, China has been quickly growing into one of the largest economies in the world. China has accomplished this feat, in part, by radically changing their policies on trade and free market interactions with other countries. During this process, China has bought approximately one hundred trillion dollars of United States debt in the form of Treasury bills, notes, bonds, and Inflation Protected Securities (Amadeo). This debt has given China leverage against the United States which has enabled China to keep the value of the United States dollar high, while keeping the value of the Chinese yuan low. As the inflation of the dollar continues to negatively affect the

The simplicity of doing business index evaluates the influence of direct policies disturbing businesses in a particular nation. According to the index, China was ranked the 89th out of 185 countries, whereas Russia, Brazil and India were graded the 120th, the 129th, and the 133rd, respectively. Therefore, China is the best option amongst the four in terms of providing a stable business environment. However, there are two significant drawbacks surrounding the Chinese regulatory framework that would critically concern GENICON. Firstly, the country has a track record of not protecting foreign intellectual property rights. As the knowledge base for the medical devices that GENICON are carrying is readily available, local manufacturers can effortlessly start manufacturing nearly indistinguishable products and sell them at lower prices. Second, policy implementation in China is often escorted with deflection, as implementation measures are carried out in unpredictable and contradictory manners. Unavoidably, the uncertainty around the regulatory system creates additional legal risks. As exhibit 3 shows, the corruption perceptions score ratifies the lack of transparency within the Chinese legal structure. According to transparency international index, China scored 3.6 out of 10 and was ranked the 79th,

When one thinks of security, they tend to think of being protected, free from harm or danger. There are various security threats that the world faces today. Threats could range from a series of cyber threats to terrorist attacks. We are incessantly encountered with catastrophic man-made and natural diseases. The Department of Homeland Security measures the nation 's vulnerabilities, meaning it takes initiative in leading and evaluating vulnerabilities and coordinating with other federal, state, local, and private entities to safeguard the most effective response. The creation of the country’s 15th Cabinet Department marked the largest reorganization of government since the Truman administration.

Former U.S. Secretary of the Navy, Donald C. Winter, in his article “Adapting to the Threat Dynamics of the 21st Century” states that the U.S. military needs to be well prepared for unannounced attacks from “terrorism in Iraq, Afghanistan, and wherever else al-Qaeda and its associates appear.” China and other nation have higher advantages in many key manufacturing areas than U.S. the military needs to have abundant funds, trained soldiers, invest in the air and sea mobility assets, and updated technologies. Winter acknowledges that a temporary reduction in some key manufacturing areas could cause the U.S. industrial stupendous harm. “It is the matter of ensuring the survival of America and the free world.”

Homeland Security is the intersection of evolving threats and hazards with traditional government and its responsibilities for civil defense emergency response law enforcement, customs border control and immigration. Moreover, the term “enterprise” is a national effort that refers to the collective efforts and shared responsibilities of federal, state local, tribal, territorial, nongovernmental and private-sector partners as well as individuals ( U.S. Department of Homland Security, 2010). Since the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, the concept of National Intelligence was arranged by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. As that was formulated, the IC community was known to be more coordinated and effective. The Act also made it possible for the integration of domestic and foreign dimensions of us intelligence to eliminate gaps and understanding national security threats. Also, this brought about the mission of the Department of Homeland Security and future capabilities of the department (Noftsinger, 2007).

Since the September 11, 2001 events, the United States of America gravitated towards a more aggressive approach in its security. The result of the tragic events was the establishment of homeland security. The White House, the federal government and the Congress joined together to establish it. On September 20, 2001, President George W. Bush issued an executive order 13228 to establish an Office of Homeland Security within the White House and assigning the Governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Ridge as its Director (Bullock, Haddow, & Coppola, 2013, p. 4). Ever since, the United States (U.S.) Department of Homeland Security diversified and evolved the way it is today. The Homeland Defense was also integrated into Homeland Security to protect the U.S. soil and its territories. However, what are Homeland Security and Homeland Defense? This paper will address those question as well as covering their missions/goals, tasks, duties, and responsibilities. In addition, a section of this paper is the assessment of the critical infrastructure protection programs of the U.S. The assessment will also include the overall capability of the nation’s critical infrastructure protection program to ensure the survivability of its critical infrastructure.

There is a raging debate on where exactly the homeland security should be placed in the US structure, and whether it should be under the Department of Defense, the criminal justice, or it should be a joint effort of every American citizen. To answer this question, it is important to consider the scope of the activities carried out under homeland security.

American peer competitors operating in the gray zone have significant implications for American security interests. China and Russia have exploited conceptual and organizational challenges (Paradoxes of the Gray Zone, 6 ) within the American establishment making it vulnerable to gray zone challenges.

In the years since 9/11, homeland security has turn out to be frequently and generally identified as both a word and as a Federal department. However, a large amount has been learned since 9/11 concerning the array of further challenges we face. Hurricane Katrina strongly illustrates the general impact of weak preparedness and response in the face of severe natural disasters. Widespread international cyber attacks from some of the most sophisticated denial-of-service efforts to persistent and rising attacks on U.S. Government cyber systems reflect the increasing

One of the things that surprised me the most about China was the types of technology used there. It surprised me that in China people would use not only the same types of technology as us but also for a lot of the same purposes. Here in the United states we have the attitude that everywhere else in the world uses technology differently, and if they do use it the same they don’t use it as often. I learned however, that in China they can be just as dependant on their technology even if it is not for the same reason. There are other similarities between China and the United States such the same kinds of expectations from home relating to education success, though they are a bit stronger of a force in China than here. On the other hand there are

The three most critical national security threats confronting the U.S. over the next five years include the following: terrorism and non-state violent groups, cybercrime, and climate change. While some of these threats present different challenges and ramifications, I believe that within the next five years, foreign-hatched and homegrown terror attacks on the U.S. homeland will remain the most——as it is currently—— imminent threats to U.S. national security. The next critical threat is cybercrime on the U.S. critical infrastructure and other facilities of security importance. The third is the primary and secondary effects of climate change. I examined these threats below.

This quote highlights the essential cooperative relationship between the U.S. and China through both the regional and global scales. With China as the economic powerhouse in the global economy and the U.S. as the world’s policeman, it is clear that both countries hold major powers in the world and their cooperation is important in addressing the global challenges. However, the relationship between U.S. and China is becoming increasingly complex and competitive. The two countries share a lot of common interest in achieving peace and stability around the world, but they often disagree on the process of attaining those goals due to the different perspectives. It’s also important to point out that these two countries are more cooperative outside

In addition to the U.S. failing to follow through on promises of military action, the Obama presidency seemed to be taking a defensive posture and positioning the U.S. into a new world order of rival power centers, namely the U.S. and China. From the appointment of Senator Check Hagel and Charles Kupchan to the Obama administration to statements made by the President at the State of the Union and Hilary Clinton as a 2008 presidential candidate, the Obama administration seemed to be accepting of the U.S. need to adapt to a new world in order from singular primacy to one that requires allies to maintain control and dominance. Though the U.S. government would not publicly acknowledge pursuing a strategy of offshore balancing, the Obama administration’s appointments, statements, and actions suggest a game plan that came right from the offshore balancing playbook. Lastly, the author lays out the case that the U.S. economy was quickly becoming second to China and that the U.S. defense spending, along with allies has seen a significant decline over the ten years. Not only has the defense spending on the U.S. and its’ allies shrunk over the past decade, but the defense spending of U.S. adversaries has risen, particularly by countries such as China and Russia.

While the U.S officially adheres to the OCP, it practice a De-facto two china policy. Under the 1979 Taiwan Relation Act, the U.S sells Taiwan military weapons and, the language of the act warns the People’s Republic that any coercive

The depth of China’s involvement in intellectual property theft is far greater than I would have ever expected. Prior to taking the business law course, I never thought about what intellectual property theft was or the impacts that it has. The report of the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property, states that “China is the world’s largest source of Intellectual Property theft” (pg 10 & 11) costing the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars per year, along with millions of jobs.