Positive And Negative Impacts Of The Teeth Condition Had Lower Positive Emotion Ratings Than The Lips Condition

Did you know your oral health can actually provide big clues about your health overall? Were you also aware that issues within your mouth could affect the rest of your body too? Understanding the intimate connection between your oral health and your overall health can help you hugely. If you aren’t aware of the links between your overall wellbeing and oral health however, then you may never be able to see the small clues that your mouth is telling you about the rest of your body.

While these studies provide positive results the draw back to them are that the sample groups for each were considerably small which means that there is insufficient evidence to support

The overall results collected by 257 students for each of the expression is roughly 2.8 for frown, 3.2 for neutral, and 3.9 for smile, each data at a statistically significant p-value of 0.001. This result disproves the norm of reciprocity theory in the hypothesis since a frown received a response closer to neutral.

Happiness is also manifested in the mouth, and when a person is unhappy or dissatisfied, the corners of their mouth will point downwards and will often be thinner than average. As a result, most pessimists have turned down and slim lips (Petegem). On the other hand, curved, full lips indicate a vulnerable yet empathetic person. In addition, having distinguished lips are considered a more desirable feature, while more curved lips signify being sharp, quick-witted, and resolute when making choices. Additionally, individuals whose top lips are slim, but have an ample bottom lip might have difficulty responding in relationships. Conversely, those with the opposite are more generous and kind (Johnson). A more distinct upper lip shows optimism and an energetic character as well

| Based on explicit knowledge and this can be easy and fast to capture and analyse.Results can be generalised to larger populationsCan be repeated – therefore good test re-test reliability and validityStatistical analyses and interpretation are

4. This study only contains one study, and the results they discover support the current literature about increasing

When researchers come up with a result to their study, it sometimes is not perfect because of the limitations. There are always limitations to every study that researchers cannot control. Identifying and explaining those important limitations will help researchers

I am reviewing the work I performed in the group under the current research and methods to present the learning I gained from the feedback and guidance provided by the supervisors. (Tuckman, Belbin, Kolb and other researcher’s work is used).

After reviewing many studies, the five most relevant were: two studies (Cahill, Stamilio, Odibo, Peipert, Ratcliffe, Stevens, Sammel, & Macones, (2006);

However, the pitfalls of the study are also included in this section as well as the factors that limited the study. This section should however, compare the results with those from other similar studies. Yet for this paper, that part was lacking. Besides, the paper discussed the potential limitations to the research as well as the strengths of the study (Viktrup, 2002). The study’s implication is also inclusive and is clearly structured and helpful. Finally, the paper had a conclusion that contained a summary and the recommendations.

The discussion briefly describes the results, but it failed to restate the purpose of the study. It discusses the results with many new citations that had not been provided in the introduction. It discussed future research implications but not in great detail. One of the greater strengths of the discussion was that it discussed multiple implications for professionals to consider. Additionally, the limitations and strengths of the study were discussed in detail.

Are the conclusions of the authors justified based on the findings? Do the authors describe the importance of this study to the field and does it fairly represent findings of the experiments?

This study was limited due to the small sample size. Although the conclusions are valid, more research with a

Evaluate the review of related research. How well did the authors provide a context for the current research in light of previous literature and gaps in current literature and knowledge?

Read the method section, the findings and the discussion section carefully. Do the authors identify any limitations for their study? If so, what are they?