Positives Of Corporal Punishment

The use of corporal punishment by a parent is currently legal in every state in the U.S., and nineteen states still allow its use by teachers and administrators in schools. GOOD START Although it is legal, corporal punishment is constantly accused of being child abuse. Child abuse is defined as the physical or mental injury, sexual abuse or exploitation, negligent treatment, or maltreatment of a child under the age of eighteen. Some people believe that all corporal punishment should be considered child abuse, others believe that corporal punishment should not be considered child abuse at all, while still others think that some corporal punishment is child abuse, and some is not. Ultimately, corporal punishment should not be considered child abuse if it is mild and is used to discipline wrong behavior.

The term corporal punishment means the intentional infliction of pain on the body for purposes of punishment and includes slapping, hitting with objects, pinching, shaking and forcing to stand for long periods of time (Epoch 1). Family researchers define corporal punishment as " the use of physical force aimed at causing children to experience pain but not injury, for the purposes of correction and control of youthful behavior" (Day 83). Spanking is one form of physical or corporal punishment (Epoch 1).

Opposition to corporal punishment stresses the long-term effects of corporal punishment such as children externalizing their behaviors or becoming more physically aggressive (Gromoske and Maguire-Jack, 2012:1054, Lansford et.al 2012: 225, Mayer and Blome, 2013: 145). Hitting a child when he/she does something

Punishment is "consequence of behaviour that decrease probability of behaviour reoccurring" (Cain & Conduit, 2014). Punishment on children elicits polarising opinions from general public, legislators and researchers alike. Consequently, significant research has been conducted on punishment including corporal punishment (CP), its application and impacts. This review aims to provide selection of literature exploring its effectiveness as behaviour modification strategy in children. Punishment is effective if target behaviour has reduced (short term efficacy) and sustained (long term efficacy) with negligible undesirable outcomes/impacts. For sustained efficacy, understanding and acceptance of punishment by child (Grusec & Goodnow,1994) would also be required.

Child abuser or an unfit parent are the words that come to mind, followed by disapproving looks and scornful stares, whenever a parent admits to using corporal punishment. Corporal punishment is an infliction of pain as punishment for unacceptable behavior, an offense, or wrongdoing. The punishment being administered by the parent or guardian can range in severity from a pop on the back of the hand to a belt or switch to the heinie. Although corporal punishment is a painful means of punishment, the issue here is whether or not it can be seen as justifiable when it comes to parents choosing to use it as a disciplinary tool at home. Whether or not a parent should spank their child has been quite a controversial

The most recognizable form of physical punishment is better known as the spanking, and should not be confused with beating. Whether it be done by hand, with paddle or a switch, it is completely legal. This punishment has been around for decades, past down from generation to generation. When used appropriately, it can be beneficial to a child’s behavior and knowing the difference between right and wrong. Many argue that there is nothing wrong with physical punishment and simply state, “I was spanked and I turned out okay!” or “I turned out just fine.” While others believe it is a negative way to punish or discipline a child, it is actually considered

Corporal punishment is a type of physical punishment that has been allowed in 19 states to be used as a way of discipline for misbehaving children. This physical punishment is mostly relating to spanking or paddling. A policy that legal near the south at most. [a] These days, corporal punishment should be used today because kids need to know obedience and should use this punishment as a way to wake them up[b]. Corporal punishment should be allowed because it is a lasting punishment, is able to to shape bad students, [c]and can permanently affect students as they grow in the future.

On the contrary, studies prove the cumulative negative affects corporal punishment has on children. These negative consequences include (but are not limited to) harm to cognitive ability and development, antisocial and violent behavior, potential for future abusive behavior during adulthood, bodily harm and injury, sexual development problems, emotional distress, and can even be a gateway to more abusive means of discipline. Admittedly, it is astonishing that all of these negative consequences result from a legal administration of discipline that 90% of all Americans say they have used (Muller).

Many studies have come out with negative effects that can come about from using many forms of corporal punishment. As parents we need to ask ourselves are we able to control ourselves when we are upset at our kids? Are we able to be fair to our kids? Can the things we do to our children come back and turn out to be used against us and others? “Corporal punishment

The world has changed in many different ways, but there are still things that need to be changed for the better. Corporal punishment is one of those things. All around the world, corporal punishment is affecting children in many ways. It is described as a form of discipline that hurts a child in a way and is used both in homes and schools. It has been going on for years upon years and very few people try to stop it. People believe corporal punishment is good for children, but there have been so many negative outcomes that other people argue against it. Although some people believe that corporal punishment helps improve a child’s behavior, corporal punishment should not be used because it could be used excessively and it is ineffective.

Corporal Punishment is a universal argumentation topic that has created a divided line between a population who believe harsher physical punishment should be considered as a sentence against offenders and those who disagree that physical punishment is un-humane to use on an offender. The United States is one out of many countries that fits the above description. Corporal punishment has been restricted from being used in prisons for quite some time. There has been retribution of bringing back corporal punishment into the U.S. criminal system due to the increase of youth violence and the high cost of keeping an inmate in prison for their time being.

Before discussing the effects of corporal punishment (CP) on children’s outcomes a distinction between CP and physical abuse (PA) must be established. Corporal punishment refers to behaviours that should not result in “significant injury” (Gershof, 2002). Straus, (1994) defines CP as “the use of physical force with the intention of causing a child to experience pain but not injury for the purposes of correction or control of the child’s behaviour”. Whereas, physical punishment, intentional behaviour or over-discipline that increases the chance of or leads to the infliction of injury can be classed as PA (Gershof, 2002; NCCNI (2000)

Corporal punishment is often seen as ineffective and as having negative results in children’s development including developing of aggressive behaviors, harming parent-child relationships, and damaging

Corporal punishment is the stopping of unwanted child behavior by a parent by causing the child to feel physical discomfort. It includes spankings, slapping and beatings, fist, or object such as a belt, switch, hangers, and cord. In other words, a punishment by hitting. Others think the opposite it is effective. Therefore, if there’s no punishment towards the children their going to keep doing undesirable behavior and throw tantrums. However, in this case parents have control and show their children who’s in control and who commands. Hitting with belts, cords, and hangers is not the only solution there’s way to discipline. Imagine if there was not corporal punishment. How will the children turn out once they get older? Just think about it. Yes, corporal punishment towards children is effective because it prevents mistakes from repeating frequently, parents have control, and rational way to discipline.

Corporal punishment is a form of punishment used on children to correct bad behavior. The definition of corporal punishment is, a physical punishment , as flogging, inflicted on the body of one convicted of a crime (Dictionary.com). While several states strictly prohibit corporal punishment in schools, 44% of states in the U.S. still allow it to occur. Corporal punishment is an inappropriate way to correct bad behavior. However, almost 50% of the states in the U.S. still allow it to occur. Corporal punishment is always wrong to use in schools because it causes long-term negative effects on students, negative opinions of school or teachers, and it can increase the rate of crime and violence from students.