Potz And Pans: The Most Possible Company To Get The Loan

Since the company’s establishment in 1896, Tootsie Roll Industries Inc. has expanded to become one of the biggest candy companies in the United States. Tootsie Roll Industries Inc. is one of America’s most recognized candy companies through manufacturing and selling some of the most popular candies in the world. The company has an extensive amount of products sold in many venues including grocery stores, vending machines, and drugstores. Tootsie Roll Industries Inc. applies innovation consistently by developing new forms of presentation and creating more options for the consumer. In the first quarter of 2011

Tootsie Roll Industries is one of America’s most recognized confectionary companies and has been in business for more than 111 years, manufacturing and selling some of the most popular candies in the world. Tootsie Roll wants to secure a loan that will help increase the company’s total liabilities by 10% in the tune of $2.5 million. This loan package is attached to an updated business plan that provides the lender with the company’s history, a vision statement, its market, products, services, management, how the loan will impact the business, and the method of repayment. This paper will detail different ratio analyses, loan justification, and how the company plans to use the proceeds.

The Credit Mobilier company was formed by George Francis Train Who was the vice president and in charge of publicity for the Union Pacific Railroad. The company was crated to limit the liability of its stockholders and to maximize the profits. The company gave cheap or free shares of stock to members of congress who would support additional funding. In 1872 the scandal was brought to the publics attention by Henry Simpson McComby. He claimed that $72 million in contracts had been given to the the mobilier company to build a railroad that only cost $53 million to create. The investors where left nearly bankrupt and it ruined the reputation of many of the congressmen who had accepted the bribes including James A. Garfield, Schuyler Colfax, James

As shown in the ratios chart, working capital has increased by $13M. Maturities of short-term investments and cash flow from operations are projected to be sufficient to sustain the company’s overall financing needs, including capital expenditures. The following corporate strategic plan identifies a project that needs financial backing.

The operator of this website, LendYou.com is not a lender but a loan broker with a large network of authorized lenders. LendYou.com is an advertising referral service to qualified participating lenders that are able to provide payday loan amounts between $100 and $1,000 in cash advance loans and up to $5000 for installment loans. Not all creditors can provide these amounts and there is no guarantee that you’ll be accepted by an independent participating lender. The service does not constitute an offer or in any way a solicitation for payday loan products that are prohibited by any state law. LendYou.com do not endorse or charge for any service or product. Any payment received is paid by participating creditors and only for advertising services

Assuming that AirJet Parts, Inc. is considering loans from National First and Regions Best, what are the EARs for these two banks? Hint for National Bank: Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve Board’s website (http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/). Select “Interest Rates” and then “Prime Bank Loan Rate”. Use the latest MPRIME. Show your calculations.

2. Forecast the firm’s financial statements for 2002 and 2003. What will be the external financing requirements of the firm in those years? Can the firm repay its loan within a reasonable period? In order to forecast the financial statements of 2002 and 2003, the following assumptions need to be made. The growth of sales is 15%, same as 2001, which is estimated by managers. The rate of production costs and expenses per sales is constant to 50%. Administration and selling expenses is the average of last 4 years. The depreciation is $7.8 million per year, which is calculated by $54.6 million divided by 7 years. Tax rate is 24.5%, which is provided. The dividend is $2 million per year only when the company makes profits. Therefore, we assume that there will be no dividend in 2003. Gross PPE will be $27.3 million (54.6/2) per year. We also assume there is no more long term debt, because any funds need in the case are short term debt, it keeps at $18.2 million. According to the forecast, Star River needs external financing approximately $94 million and $107 million in 2002 and 2003, respectively. In order to analysis if the company can repay the debt, we need to know the interest coverage ratio, current ratio and D/E ratio. The interest coverage ratios through the forecast were 1.23 and 0.87 respectively, which is the danger signal to the managers, because in 2003, the profits even not

Current ratio shows that two companies may in a favorable position to obtain short-term credit, but current ratio does not consider the types of current assets these two companies has and how easily they can be turned into cash. Kohl’s has a stronger quick ratio than Dillard’s, indicating that Kohl’s has a little stronger “instant” debt-paying ability than Dillard’s. In other words, Kohl’s has a better ability to convert assets into cash than Dillard’s.

The U.S. Bank loan approval board recommends that U.S. bank allocate the $6.5 million dollar loan to Redhook. Redhook has been a valued customer of the bank for a couple years now never faulting on any payments. Due to the fact that they have missed past payments and by looking at the past financial performance of the company shows that they have capability to

Review of Financial Research Report: This assignment is an analysis of a US publicly-traded company; its common stock could be a prospective investment.  The report is due in Week 10, in needs to be at least 5 pages, and it needs to cover the following topics:

1. Potz and Pans current ratio is 5 and WannaBees current ratio is 1.76. The company more likely to receive the loan is Potz and Pans because there higher current ratio number means they will have a higher chance of repaying their loan back to the bank when compared to WannaBees.

EZ Funding Group, Inc. is a mortgage brokerage firm that is located in Miramar, Florida. EZ Funding Group, Inc. was established in 2000. Their mortgage loans options include home purchase loans, home refinance loans, HARP 2.0 loans, home equity loans, cash out home loans, jumbo home loans, and more. EZ Funding Group, Inc. also offers FHA home loans VA home loans, reverse mortgage loans, Fannie Mae Home Path loans, plus more. This mortgage lending agency is an Equal Housing Lender.

The answer will be 1 .34 . this is a good sign that the company will be able to pay its obligations when they fall due . Based on both current ratios above , Sears company has a better current ratio at 1 .94 when compared with the current ratio of Walmart of only 1 .34 .B Sears Acid Test ratio Quick Assets 20201 1 .279354 Current Liabilities 15790 The quick assets are arrived at by adding the cash , cash equivalents ,receivables and marketable securities . The quick ratio is arrived at dividing the quick assets for the year 2007 of 20 ,201 . The quick ratio is 1 .28 times .Walmart Acid Test ratio Quick Assets 2423 0 .167566 Current Liabilities 14460 The quick ratio here is arrived at by dividing the quick assets of 2 ,423 for the year 2007 by the current liabilities amounting to 14 ,460 for the same year . The acid test ratio or quick ratio is .17 Based on the above data , Sears has a better quick ratio with its higher rate of 1 .28 as compared to the quick ratio or acid test ratio of Walmart at only .17 .C SOLVENCY LEVERAGE RATIOS Ability to pay long term obligations Sears 38700 The ratio of .85 . This shows that the company will be able to pay its obligations when the time of payment arrives .Walmart 45384 The Walmart will be able to pay its obligations when they

Another measure of a company’s ability to pay back loans, this time over a long period, measures solvency. Coca-Cola’s debt to total assets ratio is 35% in 2004 and 33% in 2005 compared to PepsiCo’s less attractive ratio of 52% in 2004 to 55% in 2005. Coca-Cola’s debts represent a healthy percentage of assets and in this case the lower the number the better. Coca-Cola’s debt to total assets ratio decreased by 2% from 2004 to 2005 while PepsiCo’s ratio increased by 3%. Were a potential lender or investor to look at these numbers alone they would prefer the performance of Coca-Cola over PepsiCo but there are still many calculations to be made and factors to consider.

As financial advisor I would urge Mr Wilson to take the loan, despite the fact of low liquidity and increase in debt throughout the last years. The loan from Suburban National bank is not sufficient for meeting the needs of Mr Wilsons company, furthermore, the debt continues to rise due to the buy-out of Mr Holtz; this also has increased the low liquidity of the company. However, the reasons why I would recommend taking the loan are: