Benson County (typology code: 38005), which is located in North Dakota, is a non-metro region with persistent poverty and persistent child poverty. It is a farming dependent county that mainly constitutes of Native Americans (USDA ERS, 2015). In 2013, 30.2% of the population were below the poverty level. The county was barely mentioned in any news, but the fact that people are living in substandard lives and the causes of their poverty worth our attentions. From ACE 255, I have learned that there are three explanations for poverty: flawed character, restricted opportunity, and big brother. As far as I’m concerned, poverty in Benson County is a result of a combination of these three causes, with more weight on restricted opportunity. In this …show more content…
Compared with the median household income ($53,741) in North Dakota as a whole, households living in Benson earned far below the state level. Similarly, as for persons below poverty level, North Dakota state had 11.9% of population below the poverty threshold, while the rate in Benson was 35.8% although the unemployment rate was only 3.5%. To explain the low household income of people in Benson, the Chapter of the Working Poor provides some useful information. According to Chapter 6, two major strategies to escape from poverty are 1. Small family size, and 2. Secondary workers. However, the average family size of Benson County was 2.9, which is small enough. Also, a majority of families have two to three workers in the labor market. It seems that the two strategies above were already satisfied, but why does Benson County still have such a high poverty level? From my perspectives, low wage should account for the reason of the working poor. Specifically, the workers may have a low level of human capital due to limited education. Another situation is businesses do not have a great demand for labor to contribute to outputs or profits. Thus, as Schiller mentions in the textbook, labor force participation is necessary but not sufficient to escape …show more content…
Take TANF as an example. The state funding to TANF was only 36.3 million dollar in 2009, which was the second lowest amount of funding among states. To encourage recipients to work, the work program expenditure was only 3.2 million dollar. However, with limited funding, the state still successfully provided as much cash assistance and as many work incentives as possible. In 2009, 0.8% of the state population received cash assistance, with $477 of benefits each month for a family of three. Furthermore, in 2009, the TANF work participation rate in North Dakota was 61%, far beyond the national level of
First, if the government were to make welfare eligibility stricter it would impede on the attempts of those below the poverty line trying to find a job. TANF ?can free up additional dollars for work related expenses and other basic needs and thus aid families? efforts to move from welfare to work? (Sard and Daskal). It is needed to help pay for those ?necessities that often accompany employment, such as additional clothing and food costs, child care, and transportation to and from work? (Sard and Daskal). The program does not just hand out money, but provides the aid needed to ?achieve self-sufficiency? through employment (Cohn). Without the additional money for clothing, food costs, child care, and transportation, an individual would not be able to maintain employment and abide by the TANF requirements. It is evident that TANF is necessary for those individuals that live in poverty and are seeking employment. If the requirements were to become stricter, the number of the employed and those living below the poverty line would increase simultaneously.
Poverty, the state of being extremely poor, exists all over America! There are several different types of poverty, and the causes of poverty. Most people think of poverty as just somebody who is homeless and has no job, somebody who has no money to support the basic needs of life, and wears ragged clothing and lives under a bridge. What people don’t know is there are people living in poverty that have jobs and make money but live so poorly that they are categorized with people that live in absolute poverty.
The current poverty rate in America is 13.5 percent (US Census Bureau). That measures out to roughly 43.1 million Americans. What exactly is poverty? Poverty means not having enough money to meet basic needs including food, clothing and shelter. However, poverty is so much more than just not having enough money. Poverty is not having access to a doctor or medications you may need, poverty is not having access to a good education. Poverty can be the people who are barely able to pay for food and shelter and simply can’t afford other expenses such as car repairs, field trips with their children and any other extracurricular activity.
staggering? Poverty occurs when a person’s need for food, clothing and shelter are not being
Poverty is present in today’s U.S. social system. For example, as Lesser states in the Clearinghouse Review, “Forty-six million Americans live in poverty” (1). Lesser then goes on to say how forty-six million Americans living in poverty correlates to almost one in every three single-parent families is poor (1). This is a daunting fact as it applies to today’s economic context with “rising unemployment rates and mortgage crises driving more individuals and families to seek the support of a cash-strapped social welfare structure” (Grijalva 1). With this in mind, many legislators are discussing the topic of poverty in the political realm. In order to tally the score of representatives the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law conducted its sixth annual Poverty Scorecard. “The 2012 Poverty Scorecard grades the voting record of every U.S. senator and representative on the most important poverty-related votes in 2012” (Lesser 1). The 2012 votes covered a range of topics such as budget and tax, food and nutrition, health care, housing, and many more (1). The results of the 2012 Poverty
These goals address and attempt to identify the deficit of the individuals living in poverty rather than the need of the individuals and their wellbeing. Clients are not receiving the assistance to move out of poverty based on the goals of the TANF program. The TANF program provides assistance for families living in poverty to meet their basic needs. The TANF policy provides families living below the federal poverty line cash assistance to meet their very basic needs for a limited amount of time. Each state has been given the power to establish TANF eligibility requirements, benefits, and services. TANF benefits can range from “$170.00 a month in Mississippi to $923.00 a month in Alaska” (Chapin, 2014, p. 322) Children are the vast majority of TANF recipients, “In 2011 there were about 1.9 million families, or 4,363,000 average monthly TANF recipients” (Chapin, 2014, p. 322). TANF funds are spent in different categories including 28.8% in cash assistance, 38.8% in other services, 16.6% in child care, 9.4% in employment programs, and 6.9% in systems and
North Carolina’s Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program is one of the primary forms of Medicaid. TANF is also called Work First, which is based on the premise that parents have a responsibility to support themselves and their children. Through Work First, parents can get short-term training and other services to help them become employed and self-sufficient later on, but the responsibility is theirs to find the actual job. Most families have two years or less to move off Work First Family Assistance and after that they are completely on their own. According to a document found on Civic Report, the sixty percent of the rise employment among single mothers is due to the fact the
Poverty plagues the entire nation. People assume that the worst of poverty is in the midst of heavily populated areas such as New York or California. What they don’t realize is that poverty rates in Grand Forks are worse than the average poverty rates in the entire nation. And it isn’t just a slight increase, poverty rates in Grand Forks County are 150% worse than the national average. The poverty rates are ridiculous, yet there are only a few articles in the Grand Forks Herald that actually focus on poverty. I researched through the Grand Forks Herald database and came up with less than ten articles in the past 5 years that focused on poverty in the area. That’s a maximum of ten articles in 1,825 days. This report focuses on the effects that
The Census Bureau uses a set of money income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. If the total income for a family or unrelated individual falls below the relevant poverty threshold, then the family (and every individual in it) or unrelated individual is considered in poverty(“Definitions Poverty”). The United States Census Bureau collects data about the United States and reports it for the general public, these include the poverty levels in the United States. Baker states “The United States stands out for its failure to significantly reduce child poverty over the past few decades and its unusually high child poverty rates relative to other rich countries” (1166). If the United States is one of the top richest countries, why does the child poverty rate continue to increase?Marriage and work have been persistent in debates about poverty, research has shown that both marriage and work have changed drastically in recent
The state of Arkansas is in poverty because of low rates and wages verses cost of living. However, this can be improved by people in our state having better job choices and better pay. The reason for low job rates and wages is that you have to be bilingual to get a job, you have to get a good education and employers aren’t able to hire as many people to work for them. All of this stuff combined with the cost of living causes poverty.
Out on the streets, sleeping on park benches, begging people for money or food: this is probably pretty close to the image that comes to mind when you hear the word “poverty”. These things aren’t usually seen around Grand Forks so people assume that there isn’t any sort of poverty issue around here. Would it surprise you to know that 21.8 percent of residents in Grand Forks County lived in poverty in 2014? That’s more than seven percent more than the national poverty rate of 14.5%. (Jacobs) The county of Grand Forks does, in fact, have a poverty issue.
The United States defines poverty for a family of four as being less than $16,036 per year, or $4,009 per person (Leone 12). People find themselves under this line for an innumerable amount of reasons. Some of these causes are under one's control and others are greater factors beyond an individual's power. Each family or individual person has unique and separate reasons for living in a state poverty. There is no way to try and define them all. Focusing in, three main topics arise that encompass the most predominant reasons for a person to fall into poverty. Education, family life and influence, along with the business cycle may work individually or together to cause poverty. These three leading
The United States federal government spent about $16.5 billion dollars each year to support the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (“Policy” 2). This program, established in 1996, provides a block grant to the states, which use these funds to operate their own programs.
This review is formulated with scholarly sources and references based off of poverty in America. This disclosure is approached with a value free sociological approach, and it will give insight on the social causes of poverty and the effects it has on America. Poverty is a very controversial topic. Many will assume that people living in poverty are lazy, made bad life decisions, or that they are solely the reason for their predicament however, people living in poverty would argue that their are deeper issues for it. Poverty will be deeply explained and researched from both perspectives
The pinpoint cause of poverty is challenging to find. People who live well off and are above the poverty line may be quick to assume that laziness, addiction, and the typical stereotypes are the causes of poverty. Barbara Ehrenreich, a well known writer on social issues, brings attention to the stereotypical ideology at her time, that “poverty was caused, not by low wages or a lack of jobs, but by bad attitudes and faulty lifestyles” (17). Ehrenreich is emphasizing the fact that statements like the one listed, often influence readers to paint inaccurate mental pictures of poverty that continue to shine light on the ideology of stereotypes being the pinpoint cause to poverty. However, there are many other causes that are often overshadowed, leaving some individuals to believe that poverty was wrongfully placed upon them. Examples would include: high rates of unemployment, low paying jobs, race, and health complications. Which are all out of one’s ability to control. There is no control over a lack of jobs and high rates of unemployment, nor the amount of inadequate wages the working poor receive. Greg Kaufmann, an advisor for the Economic Hardship Reporting Project and The Half in Ten campaign, complicates matters further when he writes, “Jobs in the U.S. [were] paying less than $34,000 a year: 50 percent. Jobs in the U.S. [were] paying below the poverty line for a family of four, less than $23,000 annually: 25 percent” (33). Acknowledging Kaufmann’s fact, the amount received for a family of four is fairly close to the yearly salary of a high school graduate, which means, receiving that kind of pay for one man may seem challenging, now imagine caring for the needs of four individuals. To make matters worse, certain families receive that amount of money and carry the burden of paying for