Poverty and Pollution

Environmental ethics has widely circled around human interactions with biotic ecosystems. Little voice has been given to city residents who are overexposed to environmental hazards. It is a subject rarely touched upon by mainstream environmentalist. Though conservation efforts receive much media attention and advocacy, environmental pollution in urban areas inhabited by minorities and the impoverished receive less attention despite it clearly being a grave injustice. It fact, it can be argued that minority and impoverished neighborhoods are deliberately targeted by corporations and governmental agencies because of the inherit vulnerability of the inhabitants. It is no secret that the impoverished in this country frequently live in areas characterized

Post the economic crisis in America and the recession during the years of 2008 and 2009, the country saw a great increase in poverty and worsening of living conditions of Americans. Currently, almost 50 million of fellow Americans are living in extremely bad conditions under the poverty line which means earning less than $11490 for a single person or $23550 for a family of four people. That’s about 1 in every 6 people in this country are living under poverty. A person living in this country on minimum wage which is $7.25 an hour also cannot pull himself out of poverty even after working 40 hours a week.

The ethical implications of businesses polluting in a poorer area would be they are careless about the environment, the people, and the future of that country. Development is the process of continuously learning and improving to achieve a greater goal. Therefore, when a manufacturer is making economic progress, the development would be coming up with a better way to handle the manufacturing wastes. A responsible business can be making economic progress and handling pollution at the same time and still be making money. It does not have to be one or the

Homelessness is an epidemic problem that faces many American’s and families across the United States, especially in Detroit. You may see homeless people sleeping in the underpasses of freeways or walking and sitting on street corners or holding up a sign asking for some support for their next meal. We all have seen homeless individuals and thought it was not our problem for their circumstances or maybe had a belief he/she was lying about their situation. Many of us make a choice to give money or buy food, but there are others who make a choice to ignore or overlook the homeless population. Society has placed a stigma and label the homeless population labeling them destitute by choice, but for many homelessness has become a way of life.

Developing countries tend to have “the most fragile environments” (Baker 197) which is due to the flow of resources dictated by the core. The core, taking advantage of the developmental level developing countries are on, exploit their lack of laws restraining harm to the environment, setting up factories causing even more environmental damage. Thus when comparing the environmental status of a developed country to a developing country there are major differences. These differences are the interaction of the people with the environment, in terms of needs, and the number of factories profiteering from the use and exploitation of natural resources. When this difference is identified then it is easier to assess not only the source but also to create laws prohibiting this exploitation and constructing programs to reverse environmental damages to specific circumstances, helping developing countries to move forward on the developmental scale instead of backwards. If this is taken into account then why is the source causing environmental damage, the core, not stopped? This is due to the dominant ideology stating that with infinite economic growth, eventually the sustainability of the environment will be achieved. The developing countries reinforces this by inviting and encouraging organizations to base their factories in their country which has immediate results, creating a smoke screen

It is morally wrong for the majority of the world population to suffer based off the decisions and actions of a privileged minority. The countries that are creating so much pollution should not only take actions to reduce emissions, but also to help repair all the damage they have caused to other, less fortunate countries worldwide.

In the United States, sources of pollution such as toxic waste dumps, incinerators, manufacturing plants, and other facilities are typically located in lower income neighborhoods—often African American and Latino—because poorer communities do not have the political and legal clout that wealthy communities do. People might argue that by placing environmental hazards in poor communities, it gives them an opportunity for employment where otherwise they can try to look for employment elsewhere but not get hire for the same reason they are building polluting machines and hazardous buildings in their neighborhood. Yes, it is an opportunity for employment but at what cost, by putting them in danger. This can easily be alleviated by evenly distributing the pollutants around the city, state, or country not targeting only a certain population but all populations. Another ethical option to help with the issue is increasing environmental standards for consumers by revising laws on pollutants that are permissible and not permissible. Of course, there are pollutants that we as a society need in order to keep up with today’s waste and population but limiting the unnecessary ones that only benefit a very small portion of the population will make even a small difference. We have to keep in mind that by addressing the issue of

This paper reviews from the article written by Stefania Barca, with the title of class environmentalism: a historical and transnational overview. I will elaborate the problem of environmental Justice in US and Brazil, in regards to the problem of the working class struggle in promoting Environmental Justice. In here, I believe that the Environmental Justice will be achieved if the government concern more into the welfare of the society, especially the working class. The actions should be taken to ensure that the interest of several stakeholders will not disadvantage the environment and the life of other people (working class). The problem of Environmental Justice itself appears because of the policies of the government which are not well analyzed in regards to the affect to both environment and communities.

Poverty. The word has a different meaning and effect on people from all different cultures and economic backgrounds. Society ignores it. It seems to be a dirty word that no one wants to speak aloud much less think about. The large amount of people who fit under this unfortunate category do not wish for others to know that they are in this certain economic status. It is easy for the idea of being poor or a part of the working class to create a shameful and embarrassing self image, because of people’s actions and the trending material items that cloud primary judgement. As a child, I did not have the best clothes or toys. My family was made up of a single mother who was required to take care of two children. The author of Seeing and Making Culture: Representing the Poor, Bell Hooks, provides you with an idea of her background in a earlier stage of her life. Her and I both came from a household where using something without permission was considered wasteful and wanting material items seen in stores were out of the question. My childhood, as I continued growing up, was still very enjoyable in every aspect. Wearing brand named clothes was never a focus for me and this did not influence how I felt about myself. My mother was hardworking and and provided me with the essentials. Although hooks’ overall message that people in a state of poverty feel negatively towards themselves is valid, she fails to present the full story that the poor

Poverty is a big problem that still exists in this world. However, it will help the youth to understand where this poverty started, what the causes are and what people could do to stop it. This issue has been the problem since then yet there is still no solution. Also, this issue should address well to everybody because if no one tries to find possible solution, things were getting worse as time goes on. This research paper informs the people what poverty is, to make sure people understands what poverty really is, what is doing to the society and most especially what people could do to stop it. To stop this problem, the youth should unite and make ways as any way the youth can. Many are those who do not know what poverty is but it refers to a condition that people having a means to afford a basic human need such as food and shelter. Also, poverty means being labelled as “poor” (Merriam-Webster 2017). To prove this point, the researcher begins with the definition of poverty. Then, she will explain the reasons of getting involve in the poverty with its branch equality and inequality. Lastly, she will discuss how people can distinguish the effects poverty is telling them.

In places such as South America where deforestation is prominent, nations should conserve and protect more land. For the sake of water quality, it is right for the agriculture industry to cut back on the use of harmful fertilizers and pesticides. In countries where many forms of air pollution are unregulated, it is ethical for these nations to set more restrictions on pollutants such as PM. Just as with other air pollutants, it is right for countries to regulate greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide in order to slow the rate of climate change. While these decisions are ethical, nations will not make them without a cost. Connections between modern industries and pollution are prominent, and change will be difficult. For this reason, governments must break down the wall separating conservation and advancement. Although some may believe they will have no effect on climate change, the United States should take greater steps in becoming a global leader of environmentalism. Looking ahead, by neglecting to protect the environment, the future will hold destructive costs. Like a bomb counting down to its last minutes, the world does not have much time left. Overall, if humans continue to place business before the environment, there will be no turning

“White families are given the benefit of the doubt when allegations of abuse and neglect arise” and blacks do not get the benefit of the doubt ever… (Post 2). The article “The Truth About Child Abuse and Poverty” by Dawn Post talks about how the average person overlooks the contributing factor of racial biases and socioeconomics that determine which families get put under the child welfare program. There are more colored families in the foster care system than white families and Post touches on a few points on why that is. She states that whites are given too much leeway, which I completely agree with. Post and I both agree this needs to be thought about more and the system needs to be evened out. Clearing the biases and giving everyone

Poverty reduction and environmental conservation represent two of the main global challenges. The two targets constitute part of the eight Global Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Arising from the thinking that Environmental degradation and poverty reinforce each other since the poor are both agents and victims of environmental destruction; the poverty-environment hypothesis has become a major concern of international development agencies and policy makers. It is often argued that the poor are often the biggest victims of environmental destruction since they depend

In today’s world it’s seen that a good amount of people are poor and live in poverty. People can not make enough money which leaves them with little to nothing to support themselves and their families. This has people pushing the government to raise the minimum wage so they can have the money they need to live and not be in constant fear of becoming broke. Not only does being in poverty mean people can not support themselves it means they also can not afford things like a home, car, or other essentials. In the book The Bean Trees, by Barbara Kingsolver, we see how people and their families are impacted by poverty and how they have to end up living and what type of choices they make.

Poverty affects a family in a number of ways, and a large portion of a child’s life that is directly affected by poverty is the child’s education. Education starts at home, and it is heavily researched and proven that poverty decreases a child’s preparation for school. Poverty increases risk factors and decreases opportunities. Low-income households often have problems with parental consistency, supervision, and support both within their family microsystem and the child’s mesosystem and exosystem. Children from low-income families often have issues with poor health, attentiveness, motivation, and insecurities. All of these impact the child’s social skills and readiness to attend school and