Power is consolidated through every aspect of our society. Depending on how you define it, power is everywhere. Whether it’s through our government’s use of statutes, superhero abilities, the contents of our wallet, or your personal knowledge, the meaning of power and how it is demonstrated has constantly differed throughout history. What is often overlooked in our modern day society, is how the meaning of power has constantly evolved, including the way it is represented and recorded. Visual art is a highly effective instrument for demonstrating power. Ever since the stone age, visual art has had the ability to deliver to audiences the extent to which power can be represented through different era’s and mediums. Thus, I invite you, to a new …show more content…
Understandings of the over-arching term of ‘power’ have constantly changed through the passing of each generation. Historically, power demonstrated in Western visual arts has always been portrayed through wealth and authority. We live in a world dominated by different degrees of power. In today’s era, every step and every action we take, has some parameter caused by ‘power’. It may be school rules, regulations and laws, or physical strength, but no matter what, power always limits us. According to the Cambridge dictionary, the current meaning of what power is, falls into three main categories of definitions. These are; power is the ability to control people and events; power is the amount of political control a person or group has in a country; and power is strength. The sub-theme of our exhibition; military power, falls into all three of these readings. The name of our sub-themed exhibition, ‘Military Power’ is derived from the ability of the theme military, in relation to visual arts, to illustrate the positive and negative consequences of power. This includes physical and emotional confrontation associated with the power of weapons, soldiers, war, and hardships. Whilst also including physical and emotional determination associated with …show more content…
The mosaic illustrates the moment of tension and conflict between the Great Greek General Alexander, and the Great Ruler of Persia, Darius. The artwork is believed to be created by an unknown artist, around 100 BC, and measures 272 cm by 513 cm. The Alexander Mosaic was discovered during the excavation of destructed city of Pompeii in 1831, in the ‘House of Fauns’. It is unknown who the artwork was made for, but due to the immense detail in the work and location in a private house of a Roman civilian, it can be established that the mosaic was likely commissioned by a family of great wealth, status and power. The mosaic was made using one and a half million coloured pieces of glass and stone called tesserae which was arranged in gradual curves called opus vermiculatum, which is a mosaic technique to effectively portray outlines of objects. The work conveys a moment in the battle that depicts a reversal of military momentum, where Darius has just ordered his men to turn, retreat and flee, under the onslaught of Alexander. The artwork is significant to the theme of the exhibition due to its reversal of military momentum and power, which can be felt through the composition from right to left. The Persian guard’s spears on the left are still facing towards the Greeks, whilst the rest of the army on the right are in the moment of turning. The chariot is being
What is power? Power itself is the ability or capacity to direct or influence the behavior of other or the course of events. It can have many forms such as the power of love, jealousy, political and so on. This has been illustrated in the poem ‘Porphyria’s Lover’ and the play ‘Othello’.
The team has always had a great defense during the Jeff Fisher Era, but for the first time the team finally has a legitimate playmaker on offense, and that guy is Todd Gurley. Gurley leads the NFL in rushing yards per carry with 6.7. Despite only playing in five games, Gurley is fifth in the entire league in rushing yards. The Rams are a serious threat to qualify for a wild car spot and are clearly the second best team in the NFC West.
“Public Art,” written by Patrick Frank, is an essay that claims public art is in everyday life and it satisfies the needs of society. First, Frank discusses the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, designed by Maya Lin, and the significance of the piece of art because it gives comfort to those who visit the monument. Next, Frank presents a humorous piece of art that is found on the rooftop of the Museum of Modern Art; this camouflage rooftop design was developed for office workers who complained about the ugly structure of the previous rooftop. Readers then learn that most of the art found on public buildings is a result of a mandate, which can result in undesirable outcomes; on the other hand, effective products can develop as a result of the mandate.
In “Congress and the Quest for Power” by Lawrence Dodd (1977), politicians enter Congress with the sole incentive to obtain power for their own arbitrary reasons. However, this power requires reelection; by being reelected, they are proving that are conforming to society's traditions, creating an air of personal equitableness, and helping themselves gain the the necessary skills that justify the exercise of power. The member of Congress soon develops an incumbent advantage and is no longer afraid of losing his position, whichever one it may be. As the hunt for power and authority continues, he moves through different phases that bring him closer and closer to the end of his goal. For example, the politician will gather up support from the electoral base by doing casework and joining housekeeping committees and legislative and committees that have to do with their district’s needs. If he finds himself successful, he will move on to serving primary committees such as those dealing with commerce, education, and labor. He becomes a legislator and focuses on national concerns rather than the more local ones, gaining power as he does so. If the Congressman is able to get this far in
Power becomes inseparably bound in this dynamic as both claims, that is to represent and to claim unrepresentable, are "power claims" one claiming the power to do something and the other claiming to know something. Thus, a visual rhetorics (of power) must negotiate this context, this finitude of ìhistoryî images, and the reputed failure of these images to represent. This last task may be better thought of as an imperative because failure to negotiate it suggests that the only way to represent Holocausts would be to literally re-present them. One way for a visual rhetoric to begin negotiating these tensions is to engage the notion of self-reflexivity.
People use this art work to express and share their patriotism. They use it to stand up for what they believe in and take action if it requires it. The act of new legislation being formed to protect the flag was an example of taking
Visual practices in this era are key elements for the president in order to enable his ideas to be conveyed to his audience, here he is able to Label individuals as heroes and villains, this is an ideal way of building a relationship with American society since they are bombarded by media to portray a vision of what is right and what is wrong, and usually there are victims and perpetrators. As the article elaborates, two important aspects to the process of visual interpretation, one of them being that the images are interpreted with already existing context; images come with words and historical baggage. Hence, our hero and villain dilemma, followed by visual images are presented as objective and authentic pieces of evidence, “not a representation of reality, but reality itself.” Pg.618
The history of graphic art and the cycle of politicization, depoliticization and then repoliticization span the late 19th century through and into the 21st century. Evolving from humble beginnings into the commercial behemoth it’s become to today this essay will explore graphic design’s evolution and the politics that affected this growing art movement during this influential timeline.
Power is the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events. Like Adolf Hitler and the play Macbeth, it is clear that power can be used in
In this chapter I will look at the cultural value attributed to works of visual art that use destruction as a tool in their creation. Art that specifically and mindfully deals with destruction shows the complex process involved in a way that audiences can interact with. ‘Only up close do you see that a process of destruction is taking place which is as complex as the process of creation.’ (Dorment, 2001). When presented in a dedicated space and given the label of art, it becomes difficult and almost pointless to try and separate and distinguish what is destruction and what is creation as they amount to the same thing.
The second mosaic image from the Great Palace in Constantinople (500AD) is a very absorbing piece that brings up many questions when you first look at it. Because Constantinople had a strong tie with Chariot Racing, specifically at the Circus of Constantinople in the 6th century, it can be assumed that this image has a connection to that. The first link is the two legs that look like horse hooves in the top right area of the image, although you cannot tell for sure because the image is cut off. Another association is the palm branches off to the right, which were a staple in Chariot races as one of the prizes the victors would be able to hold and wear. The fact that there is a lot of ‘empty space’ in the middle signifies that this place had an area which the horses would be able to run the races.
The 48 Laws of Power, by Robert Greene, talks about how you can see the signs of power, implement them yourself, or protect yourself from power through what he calls these 48 Laws. In this book, he talks about what people in history have done to follow these laws and later to become successful, and how people in power have disobeyed his laws and later fell from power and had to face painful death or humiliation. In other words, Robert Greene backs up his claims by telling us that either follow or disobey his laws, history will be his evidence. And Robert Greene shows that driving to power can lead you to success or end up as a failure.
In the Exedra a mosaic is shown. The House of the Fawn was stripped of its elaborate mosaics and then permanent damage was committed to these mosaics when the allied bombings happened in 1943. The House of the Fawn adorns the most famous mosaic in Pompeii, - The Alexander mosaic, it is thought that this mosaic is a copy of a painting painted by Greek painter Philoxenos of Eretria, shortly after the battle was fought. The mosaic shows Alexander in battle with the King of Persia, Darius the third, during the campaigns in Asia. Alexander is shown on the left and Darius on the right. The Alexander mosaic shows the moment of battle with soldiers fighting around the two kings. This mosaic measured two hundred and fifteen square feet and is “ a work of epic proportions in fine Opus Vermiculatum ”3. It was thought that the mosaic was commissioned to commemorate the role of an ancestor of the owner of the house in the battle itself.
YES: A Search for Power: The “Weaker Sex” in Seventeenth-Century New England by Lyle Koehler "Women, particularly those adolescents who experienced fits, used the witchcraft accusation as a viable form of self-expression in 1692–93. Burdened by the restrictive contingencies of the ideal feminine role, with its dictum (reinforced in church and school) that good girls must control their longings for material joy and submit to stronger adult authority figures, many young females probably felt a great deal of frustration as they searched for gaiety, attention, accomplishment, and individual autonomy. This was especially true considering the recent fits of the Goodwin children in Boston (1688), the occupational assertiveness of female innkeepers
Some theorists believe that ‘power is everywhere: not because it embraces everything, but because it comes from everywhere… power is not an institution, nor a structure, nor possession. It is the name we give to a complex strategic situation in a particular society. (Foucault, 1990: 93) This is because power is present in each individual and in every relationship. It is defined as the ability of a group to get another group to take some form of desired action, usually by consensual power and sometimes by force. (Holmes, Hughes &Julian, 2007) There have been a number of differing views on ‘power over’ the many years in which it has been studied. Theorist such as Anthony Gidden in his works on structuration theory attempts to integrate basic