Power Of Emotional Freedom Technique And The Universal Laws Of Creation

of the meaning of life. It works together with self -actualization, a level of psychological

Neil Degrasse Tyson points out in his article “Cosmic Perspective”, first published in the Natural Magazine in 2007, that if every human were to truly comprehend how stupendous and interraled the universe is to us, our perspective on humanity would shift from a focus on our distinctions to our connections. Tyson explores through many examples of the “cosmic perspective” to prove just how closely associated we are with the universe.

Chemistry and Physics are our understanding on how the natural laws and forces are at work in our Universe. If these laws are considered Universal then they would govern living organisms as well, therefore it would be near impossible for living systems to disobey any of these fundamental properties.

No one likes being defined by the things in which they don’t excel at. These are the things that challenge our character and really force us to evaluate who we really are. My extensive time of struggle in science put me on an intensive pathway towards the excellence I knew I could acquire. After finding an effective learning style, I not only aced the class, but I also won “The Most Likely to Pursue a Science Major.” This accentuated how far knowledge could get you. I was able to conclude that knowledge was truly power. But, its power is limited unless the knowledge is allocated to others. After witnessing countless injustice over a long period of time, I decided to learn about the law. How beneficial would it be if I were to keep this knowledge

To explain, beginning with the basic atomic building blocks, a perfect harmony of protons, electrons and neutrons must be in a balanced existence for any and all to even occur. In addition, through scientific study our species has discovered how notions of gravity, oxygen, and complex interactions between energy and matter all coexist (once again in perfect harmony) to create the moment us ‘humans’ take so fiercely for granted. Whether through direct social control, notions of ‘common sense’, popular norms, and all the other various politics of life it is easy to lose sight of the clarity, divinity, and simplicity of the

Most importantly, “an individual has to learn to walk safely through life, maintaining his harmony with the universe” (Lee 11). In simple words, the individual is left to figure out things on his own, he is left to go through hardships and explore to find out what is good and what is bad. Such as “what is to be done with the left hand… what to avoid touching, or saying, or looking at” (Lee

in a way that we can will the maxim of our action to become a universal law.

• that a person can learn to become aware of the interaction of cognition, emotion, and behavior; and that altering the ones that may be more directly under our control or influence – cognition and behavior – will impact the person’s responses on all levels.

Natural law theory is based on human nature and its predisposition to do good. The determination of what’s good and evil, however, is often drawn

Lightman explains that the world we see around us was created by a plethora of precise actions

Either we share Emerson’s intuition or we do not. Either we see the beauty of the whole or we do not. And if we do share Emerson’s spirituality, we also share his category of mistakes, the confusion of the logical relationship between good and evil with the possibility that good deeds or characters may emerge in response to evil experiences.

While David Lewis’s essay “New Work for a Theory of Universals” (1983) is quite extensive in its scope and insight, I only wish to draw attention to his reasoning about the scope of universals. Lewis makes a more radical distinction between “property” and “universal” than most philosophers. Lewis defines the word “property” very broadly: an object has a property by virtue of being a member of a set, so there are as many properties as there are sets. Given that Lewis is a realist about both set theory and possible worlds, he must recognize a vast and exotic array of properties. There is a property of fuzzy redness and non-square largeness as much as there is a property of redness, both being sets. Obviously not everything that is designated a property can claim the status of universal. Only those properties that can be wholly present in multiple locations are candidates for being universals. Among these, those given by empirical science (natural properties) make the final cut and are crowned as universals.

The physics, metaphysics, and every rule set in place comes from God’s understanding of each rule. Leibniz says, “nor can I approve of the opinion of some moderns who maintain boldly that what God has made is not of the highest perfection and that he could have done much better,” meaning all the

“Metaphysics encompass the study of what is sometimes termed “ultimate reality”. As such, metaphysics raises questions about reality that go beyond sense experience, beyond ordinary science. Metaphysical questions involve free will, the mind-body relationship, supernatural existence, personal immorality, and the nature of being. Some philosophers question the very possibility of a reality

Consciousness: Awareness about the action takes place and also applies the moral principles on daily basis.