Precautionary Principle

Genetically Modified Organisms, or GMO’s, are organisms that have had genes from a different organism implanted into their own genetic code in order to produce a new result (“Genetically engineered foods”). This practice has elicited polar responses across the globe, for a multitude of reasons. Besides the obvious reason, being the morality of changing an organism's DNA for human benefit, one frequently noted problem is the monopolization of GMO’s by the company Monsanto, whose name is nearly synonymous with GMO’s due to their involvement with these crops. Monsanto has been at the center of many controversies regarding GMO’s, and is even considered to be ranked third to last for reputation among all major American companies (Bennett). Most

The precautionary principle is based on the 6 basic concepts of the Principle 15 in the 1993 Rio Declaration. Explain the precautionary principle and identify these 6 concepts.

There are some debates that are put against precautionary principle. One of those debates says that "If precaution applies to everything, precaution would stop all technology in its tracks." This reproach complicates the rational precautionary methodology to policymaking with definite precautionary action. It is incorrect on two bases. Firstly Precautionary principle is not always meant to halting or implementing a ban. It can also mean implying a temporary suspension while further research is steered, calling for checking of technologies and products that are in use already, adapting to safer substitutes, and so forth. Secondly, a wide precautionary approach will boost the growth of better technologies. Using this line, society will accept some technologies while rejecting others. Making uncertainty clear, seeing substitutes, and increasing transparency and the accountability of

An alternative to the precautionary principle is cost-benefit analysis. Using cost-benefit analysis, one compares the cost with the benefits. This is usually based on a common measure such as money. Sunstein introduces the concept of “cognitive cost-benefit analysis” (p. 129). This type of analysis does not depend on an economic analysis, but instead shows what may be at stake by making some regulatory decisions. Sunstein is not overly fond of this method

They both rely on data, but the precautionary principle is more of a question of “what if?”, based on previous data found in other chemicals which resulted in severe harm to the planet and human race. The precautionary principle is like saying, “We better not use bombs on China because it will start a war.” We are not 100 percent sure it will, but based on history, we can only assume it will. The risk versus benefit analysis only relies on data. It has all of the information found in research studies conducted to find the risk of using DDT out in large populated areas. Once the risk assessment has been completed, the benefits of using DDT are listed as well. Using DDT prevents mosquitos from going into homes, and because it repels them, they will not infect them with the Malaria and West Nile viruses they carry. Risk versus benefits analysis views all of the statistics associated with using DDT, therefore it does not look into the future to see what can happen with too much exposure to

Another contributing factor to the controversial nature of GMOs is the fact that a majority of the world does not consider such food products safe, since “ in more than 60 countries around the world, including Australia, Japan, and all of the countries in the European Union, there are significant restrictions or outright bans on the production and sale of GMOs” (The Non-GMO). However, even though genetically engineered organisms are widely considered to be unsafe in many aspects, the U.S. government has little to no restrictions on the production and consumption of these products.

The centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1994 issued a new isolation guidelines that emphasize to tiers of approach to infection control (MP). There are two important tiers that contains precautions designed to care for all patients in a health care setting regardless of their diagnosis or risk of an infection. Also, the tier contains precautions designed to decrease the risk of transmission of disease through body fluids; which is referred to Standard Precautions. Universal precautions apply to patients and assumes all blood and body fluids are infected with bloodborn pathogens. Standard precautions apply to blood, body fluids, monitact skin

Hello,Today I will be basically talking about how the movement of people, food, and manufactured goods can have such a negative impact on public health along with basically along with also discussing if steps should be taken as soon as possible to reduce these flows. We will also be talking about basically if there are other options are there for lowering the spread of global diseases along with If increased trade in food could lead to the spread of food-borne illnesses and also on the other hand,deciding what measures should be taken to reduce the incidence of these diseases. After I answer these particular questions, The last question that we will be discussing is basically about how I personally feel about genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and basically If I feel like the benefits will basically outweigh the costs of producing food in this manner or not.

The authors of this article are credible due to their experience in the field of GMO research. Erik Millstone is a professor in Science and Technology Policy at the University of Sussex. Professor Millstone is also the Director of Studies for the SPRU MSc in Science and Technology Policy. Professor Millstone also happens to be UK’s leading independent scholars in food safety policy. Andy Stirling is also a Professor in Science and Technology at the University of Sussex. He was Director of Studies for SPRU MSc until turning it over to Professor Millstone. Professor Stirling has also served on many different boards such as the UN IHDP Integrated Risk Governance. Dominic Glover is an expertise in Agriculture, Biotechnology, and environmental

Some risks may be of greater concern than the others. Prioritizing is important to decide the appropriate course of action as the actions will not mitigate or respond to all the risks. Organizations determine acceptable degrees of residual risk based on organizational risk tolerance and the specific risk tolerances of decision makers. [1]

The way governments have regulated GM foods varies. In some countries GM foods are not yet regulated. Countries which have legislation in place focus primarily on assessment of risks for consumer health. Countries which have provisions for GM foods usually also regulate GMOs in general, taking into account health and environmental risks, as well as control- and trade-related issues (such as potential testing and labelling regimes). In view of the dynamics of the debate on GM foods, legislation is likely to continue to

There are about 795 million people suffering from hunger in the world, from whom 21,000 die on a daily basis [1]. Although humanity is currently distant from eradicating this lash in every corner of the planet, several solutions are currently being evaluated to guarantee food security. GM crops are hailed by some supporters as the definite solution because of their greater nutritional value and higher yields with respect to traditional ones, while others consider them to be detrimental to the environment and pose health risks. Due to this lack of consensus, GM crops widespread proliferation has been currently hindered either by governmental legislations or people’s fears. In order to bring some clarification to the former discrepancy, a critical analysis, presenting both points of view, has been carried out, concluding with my personal evaluation.

There are many opinions and thoughts I have regarding the subject matter of this week’s written assignment. I will attempt to demonstrate in a short, succinct way, the ideas that have been lurking in my mind regarding these topics. The paper will go through reducing flows of people and goods, options regarding the spread of global disease, the spread of food-borne illnesses, reducing the incidence of food-borne illnesses, and the broad topic of GMOs.

There are many opinions and thoughts I have regarding the subject matter of this week’s written assignment. I will attempt to demonstrate in a short, succinct way, the ideas that have been lurking in my mind regarding these topics. The paper will go through reducing flows of people and goods, options regarding the spread of global disease, the spread of food-borne illnesses, reducing the incidence of food-borne illnesses, and the broad topic of GMOs.

One well accepted description of risk management is the following: risk management is a systematic approach to setting the best course of action under uncertainty by identifying, assessing, understanding, acting on and communicating risk issues. In order to apply risk management effectively, it is vital that a risk management culture be developed. The risk management culture supports the overall vision, mission and objectives of an organization. Limits and boundaries are established and communicated concerning what are acceptable risk practices and outcomes. Since risk management is directed at uncertainty related to future events and outcomes, it is