Essay about President Bush And Us Foreign Policy

Throughout the course of history, the United States has remained consistent with its national interest by taking many different actions in foreign policy. There have been both immediate and long term results of these actions. Foreign policy is the United States policy that defines how we deal with other countries economically and politically. It is made by congress, the president, and the people. Some of the motivations for United States foreign policy are national security, economics, and idealism. The United States entry into World War I in 1917 and the escalation of the Vietnam War in 1964 and the both had great impact on the United States.

The president is constantly looking toward the state of nation’s defense. All major decisions and strategies are his to make alone. Likewise, the president is the nation's number 1 political boss. People look to the president as the leader for public opinion. Even though the president seems like he couldn’t take on many other roles, he is also the Chief of State, he is the leader of the rituals of the American Democracy.

Our initial question asks why the President is the dominant force in foreign policy making within the U.S. government? A corollary is to ask whether or not the President should be the dominant force in foreign policy. This is an ongoing debate and tension between the Executive and Legislative Branches. First, we should understand that, under our current President, there is strong opinion that he should not be the dominant force for foreign policy. There are at least two opposing points of view regarding the role of the President and foreign policy. If one favors the Executive Branch, one takes the position that the Executive is better able to respond quickly and efficiently to changing conditions in world politics. If one favors the Legislative Branch, one takes the position that the Legislative is better able to consider, review, deliberate, and debate various points of view before deciding what course of action would best serve the interests of the entire nation.

Thus the imperial presidency was born from foreign affairs, from “faith and duty and the right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world” at any moment without the approval of congress (Schlesinger). Past presidents have dealt with national emergencies, this pressure is responsibility that he “must take unto himself” and act accordingly (Schlesinger). Good government starts with the appearance of our leader, and the entire executive office. The president should be representative of the all people in the United States, an exceptional role model who takes the people’s needs into account. The best time for a strong imperialistic president is when faction, anarchy, and excessive ambitions threaten it. The energy put forth by the president “generally characterize the proceedings of one man in a much more eminent degree” than that of a weaker and more dispersed power system (Hamilton). The importance of this energy highlights the respect our government continues to have for the constitution because of the importance it maintains in this day and age.

The president is the foreign policy leader for the United States with an important political, military and economic role in the international arena. If there is collision between the president and congress, can congress restrain the president in foreign policy making?

American foreign policy relates to what is done in foreign countries by the United States of America. The foreign policies include controlling of the governments of foreign countries or setting some rules in those countries. The foreign policy of America has always been changing all through the US existence. The changes have stemmed from the dynamics of exogenous and substantial influences of watershed up to the international system and also the effects and changes of endogenous inside the government of the United States. Outstanding assertions like the policies of Monroe, intercontinental encounters such as the Second World War, War of the Spanish and Americans, and the cold war and also conflicts that were termed as local including the Korean War and the Vietnam War considerably shaped the American foreign policy (Kissinger et al., 1969).

Strong leadership is critical in bringing the nation in the right direction. As the face of the nation, a strong president is needed to maintain the reputation the United States has with the rest of the world. When working with foreign nations,

The president's role as chief diplomat of the United States requires the direct communication with leaders of other countries, and to promotion the interests of the United States abroad. To ensure the United States does not appear divided to the rest of the world the president is allowed to use his own discretion with regard to foreign policy. The Constitution does not clearly describe the role of the president in foreign policy. It states that the president can make treaties and receive and appoint foreign ambassadors, with the requirement that they have to be approved by a two-thirds vote of the

As the US lead the world as the world's largest economic and military power the decision made in White House could affect the economic prosperity and security of other nations

The 9/11 attacks would change President Bush’s foreign policy focus from building relationships with other great powers such as China and Russia to the terrorist countries and other radical fronts such as Iran, Iraq, and North Korea. In the past the U.S. concentrated on containing and deterring encroachment on other countries. President Bush and his administration would take a preemptive approach to dealing with these factions. President Bush viewed these areas as a security threat because of their propensity to harbor and provide hiding for the extremist terrorist groups.

The Power of President and Congress Every four years, together with not only people from over the world but also American are more excited and eager to wait for the result of U.S. presidential candidate because they elected and believed that he will bring them a hope to maintain and improve the whole scale of economic well-being as well as national security. The president is the one who has the highest power on hand to manage, regulate and solve national and international issues; however, people seem to ignore the role of Congress. In fact, the president would not be able to run the government himself without Congress’s assistance. Especially, in term of the foreign policy, it is defined as a series of strategies chosen by the state to ensure America’s interests and to achieve goals

Arguably the most powerful position in the world, the President holds unprecedented international influence, and in such a connected and constantly evolving world, subtle missteps carry great weight. With elections looming over the horizon for most in the Oval Office, the public’s perception of the Commander-in-Chief is critical. The presidents of the future should understand what power they possess and how to wield it. And albeit an oversimplification of a complex position, three rules ought to rule them all; protect businesses when they’re supplying jobs, war should be a last resort, but maintain a robust military, and never cease to let the needs of the many outweigh the deep

The way a president or world leader can affect their respective countries or others with one decision or action is intriguing. They often have to make difficult decisions that can be often become controversial depending on the beliefs and views of the country’s citizens. Although the president has advisors, congress and the rest of the government; I find the amount of consideration and pressure that they put into decisions to be interesting. The code and conduct of how a world leader should act and make decisions is extremely important; with the lives of their citizens on the line, each moral and ethical decision needs to be made clearly and effectively. “Because the presidency of the United States entails great power, the decisions of individual

A civilian’s perspective on an event in which soldier’s acted will always be one of distance. ‘Distance’ in the sense that not only did the civilian not take part in the actual event, he has in most cases not bore witness to it as well. In modern western society, passively stumbling upon stories recounting first person perspectives on modern historical events is a rare form of communication, rather these perspectives have been substituted by the short clips news agency feel are appropriate for a public audience. Thankfully, the pricelessness of primary sources has not been lost onto the sources themselves, and there is a plethora of first person perspectives simply waiting to be revealed and valued. The invasion of Iraq, a most recent event, has also been greatly subjected to this trend of displacing ‘on-scene’ perspectives with the ease, comfort, and sensationalism modern media presents. The effects of the invasion are still potently lingering in the Middle East today, and news of them are shaping the foreign policy of the United States. An event of such impact on our most immediate future, and the future of an entire region of the globe, demands a closer look.

As the commander in chief, the president plays a significant role in shaping foreign policy. The president possesses the power to appoint senior cabinet members, commit troops and conduct high level talks with foreign governments. Congress, on the other hand, has the power to ratify treaties, confirm the president’s appointees and approve budgetary measures. And while the president has the ability to commit troops, only Congress has the authority to declare war. Despite criticisms of the American policy making process describing it as inefficient and slow moving, the main purpose and thus benefit of the constitutional separation of power is the framework of checks and balances that safeguard against monopolization of foreign policy decision making.