Essay On Presidential Democracy Vs Parliamentary Democracy

Many politicians argue that there is a need for institutional reform in the United States—the sole purpose of such reform should be to develop a more efficient system for the state as a whole. However, others argue that there are existing institutions in the United States that are structured efficiently. In order to help determine where an individual will stand on the debate about institutional reform, one must compare the effects of different forms of political institutions with the existing form in the United States. There are three new proposals of reform to discuss for the United States: 1) change in the electoral system for the House of Representatives, 2) change in the executive structure

The president, who is the head of the executive branch, is elected by the entire nation and serves four years. According to article II of the Constitution the president has the power of execution and enforcement of laws passed by the congress, choose cabinet members and officials, he is the head of state and the commander and chief of the armed forces. The vice president is also a part of the executive branch and is a position to take presidency in case something happened to the president. In contrast, the judicial branch officials are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. In article three of the constitution the judicial branch is established and to let the congress to determine the judicial structure, the jurisdiction of the federal courts and the number of Supreme Court Justices.

Presidential power refers to the amount of power which the president has. The constraints to this power are time, information and bureaucracy mostly due to the checks and balances system.

Many people help the president manage the business of the executive branch. His most important advisers are the members of the Cabinet. Over the years, the size of the Cabinet has changed. George Washington's first Cabinet had just four secretaries. There was one each for the departments of Foreign Affairs now known as the Department of State, the Treasury, and an Attorney General. The modern Cabinet has fifteen heads of departments, as well as a number of other important officials. Secretaries of Agriculture, Labor, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, Transportation, Energy, Education, and Homeland Security are among some of the other Cabinet members. The President also has legislative powers which include, The president can veto any bill passed by Congress and, unless two-thirds in each house vote to override the veto, the bill does not become law. Much of the legislation dealt with by Congress is drafted at the initiative of the executive branch. In an annual and special messages to Congress, the president may propose legislation he or she believes is

does not have a large reign over any other branch in government. Though the President is influential, he does not have the ability to control the Judicial or Legislative branch, due to checks and balances. The President does not even have the equal power of a governor with respects to pardons. The President has the ability to delay any trial, or excuse any criminal except in cases of impeachment, treason, or murder. A governor may use pardons in these cases. This disability allows for a more stable and equal Judicial system, less likely to be corrupted. An elected monarch would surely be able to excuse any prisoner he wished, which is not the case for the president. The President also can appoint federal judges and ministers, but only with the senate’s approval. This further proves the lower extent of power beheld by the President compared to a monarch, as the senate ultimately decides which ministers and judges will be appointed. The President has a unique part of the Legislative, which is the veto as stated previously. This allows him to check, but not obstruct, the legislative process. Ultimately, the President has minimal control over the other branches, than an elected monarch would have over

The character of the presidency that the constitution established is through Article II.  Article II granted all executive power to a singular person for the reason that a single person can make swift decisions in the time of need.  During the Constitutional Convention some delegates did prefer a multi-person "executive council" but ultimately this position was overturned. Also, as part of Article II it states how the president will be chosen.  The constitution established "electoral college" which was an indirect way of electing the president rather than the electoral system of presidential election. The electoral college made it possible to lose the popular vote but win the electoral vote and attain the position of president. This is because

The president has many responsibilities and his job is no joke . If the president has any trouble with any part of his job he has people who are there to help him out along the way . He has many important duties and if he fails to fulfill them he could be impeached . The president has the power to create laws . Increasing budgets increase the scope of government, but decreases in taxes and increases in debt make it more difficult to add or expand programs.

As documented in Article II of The Constitution, the legislatures and lawmakers wanted to offer the world something unique; that of a leader whose powers originated from the people as opposed to the traditional powers that run down a specific lineage. The American constitution however, provides guidance as to the terms and conditions of the office for the president as they embrace modernization and the aspects of the nation. Over the years the powers have been ran by the Chief Executive. This was evident due to the exercise of power by several presidents, and as well as the roles played by Congress.

The Electoral College is a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast in votes for the election of the president and vice president. The number of representatives is based on the population of the state, and a faithful elector will vote for the candidate in which the state majority voted for.

Legislative Powers - Despite the Constitutional provision that "all legislative powers" shall be vested in the Congress, the president, as the chief formulator of public policy, has a major legislative role. The president can veto any bill passed by Congress and, unless two-thirds in each house vote to override the veto, the bill does not become law. Much of the legislation dealt with by Congress is drafted at the initiative of the executive branch. In an annual and special messages to Congress, the president may propose legislation he or she believes is necessary. If Congress should adjourn without acting on those proposals, the president has the power to call it into special session. But, beyond all this, the president, as head of a political party and as principal executive officer of the U.S. government, is in a position to influence public opinion and thereby to influence the course of legislation in Congress. To improve their working relationships with Congress, presidents in recent years have set up a Congressional Liaison Office in the White House. Presidential aides

American government does not govern people; otherwise it is governed by people. Every American citizen has right and obligation to protect their benefit and rights, and to decide their government how to use their power. I agree with representative democracy in America. In the essay, I will explain why government is necessary, which kind of political system is the best to America, Compare and contrast direct democracy to representative democracy, explain what Teledemocracy is, and the Dangers of Direct Democracy.

A presidential government does not depend on legislative majority to exist. A semi-presidential government does depend on legislative majority to exist and has a popularly elected official. A parliamentary government only depends on a legislative majority. A government in a parliamentary system is composed of a prime minister and the cabinet. A cabinet is a group of ministers. Cabinet ministers have responsibility for what goes on in their ministry, known as ministerial responsibility. Ministers must publicly support cabinet decisions, known as collective cabinet responsibility. Two scenarios in which a new government forms involve an office-seeking politician or a policy-seeking politician. A policy-seeking politician wants to shape policy, while an office-seeking politician is interested in benefiting the office and wants as much power as possible. An attribute qualifies someone for membership in an identity category. An identity category is a social group someone can place his or her self. Crosscutting attributes are the unrelated attributes a country has, and reinforcing attributes are the correlated attributes a country has. Social cleavages are the ways a society splits. Duverger’s law, according to Principles of Comparative Politics by Clark, Golder, and Golder , states that single-member plurality systems encourage two-party systems. An electoral system is a set of laws used to regulate the competition between candidates, or parties, or both. Rules are easier to

At first sight it seems like this organisation of power is in correlation with Democracy. Nevertheless because different political parties rules those three arms of government, this coalition has blocked the resolution of certain conflict or issues regardless of the people’s opinion.

In Presidential systems of government, the level of support for the president in congress, either through a majority or coalitions, influences the success of the regime to get things done. The amount of parties in a system indicates the likelihood the president will have a majority or be forced to focus on forming

Political systems in the world can be drastically different, or not too far off from one another. Depending on the differences of the political system it can either make it harder or easier to compare with another country. Two countries that have comparable and contrastable political systems are the United States and the United Kingdom. The best way to describe how the two systems are related is, “the US system of government is of course fundamentally different to that in the UK” (Hazell, Chalmers and Russell 223). The structures and institutions, political parties and elections, and political culture and ideology are prime examples of the similarities and differences of the two political systems.