Presidential Election Winner

The New York Times columnist David Brooks calls it “the greatest political shock of our lifetime.” At the end of August, it seemed as though Donald Trump was destined to fail in his bid to become the 45th President of the United States. After months of new revelations of sexual harassments and use of vulgar language, spectators of the political sport were almost certain that Secretary Clinton would win, and then that fateful day came. Everyone, including some of Donald Trump’s most ardent supporters were shocked at the outcome of the election, leaving many to ask how such a thing could happen. While still shocking, ideas and concepts learned in the Election the President seminar have helped to explain the process, the results, and even the candidates themselves.

The 1980 presidential election of the United States featured three primary candidates, Republican Ronald Reagan, Democrat Jimmy Carter and liberal Republican John Anderson. Ronald Reagan was the governor of California before he decided to run for the presidency. John Anderson was a representative in Illinois and Carter was the incumbent. The lengthy Iran hostage crisis sharpened public opinions by the beginning of the election season. In the 1970s, the United States were experiencing a straining episode of low economic growth, high price increases and interest rates and an irregular energy crisis. The sense of discomfort in both domestic and foreign affairs in the nation were heading downward, this added to the downward spiral that was already going on. Between Carter, Anderson and Reagan, the general election campaign of the 1980s seemed more concerned with shadowboxing around political issues rather than a serious discussion of the issues that concerned voters.

When the news of the email and investigation were out many were in no support to have someone like Hillary as a president. They did encourage a liar to be our president and did not think someone like Clinton would be fit to run the country. Just days before polls opened the FBI made a surprising decision to re-examine Hillary and newly related emails. Many liberals and conservatives were angered by this decision and democrats said the FBI should have gathered more facts before making it public. Only to announce that the FBI would not reverse its past decision. Among democrats a cause of concern occurred when news about the FBI broke out; A third of the voters said they were less likely to support Clinton.(Roberts, Dan) Hillary herself was said to blame part of her loss of the

November 8, 2016. As the clock ticked from day to dust, the American population sat down to the conclusion of the forty fifth presidential election. Within moments, the fate of the nation was broadcasted into the homes and hearts of millions. For the some, the results of the election bought upon a sense of joy and excitement. However, for the other half of America’s citizens, hearing the call for Trump to presidency emitted feelings of sadness, disappointment, and above all else, confusion. How did a multi-billionaire businessman defeat a former First Lady of the United States and Secretary of State to become the president on the United States? In fact, how did a man of such little constitutional knowledge obtain the amount of political attention

The United States Presidential elections are often events that captivate and interest a number of people around the world. The 2000 U.S. presidential election was particularly notable for more than one reason. Certainly, the fact that an election year in the year 2000, the marking of the next millennium and next century, is significant in of itself. In addition, there were a number of critical issues facing the candidates in this election, as with any election. The role, presence, and influence of the United States media were additional factors that heightened the tension of the 2000 presidential election. The election itself was fraught with controversy. The Supreme Court had to be involved and render a ruling with respect to accusation of fraudulent vote counting. Overall, the 2000 United States Presidential Election is an election that is remembered for controversy, polarization of the American public, as well as issues of confusion and mistrust between the American public and the American government.

The 2016 presidential election seemed to be a particularly hectic election. On November 8,2016, I was checking my Facebook newsfeed. As I scrolled through my newsfeed, I see a lot of posts related to the election. People would post opinions on each of the presidential candidates as well as which their predictions of which candidate will win. The newspaper websites provided frequent updates throughout the day to inform people about the progress of the election. That night, I watched tentatively as the ballots were being counted, and I saw people’s comments of shock and disbelief when Trump managed to get ahead of Hillary in terms of electoral college votes.

In the article “College Students Are Inconsistent Voters for a Reason” by Quentin Kidd he acknowledges the few successes that Millennials have done in terms of voting. Stating how Obama has voted into office by the

The Trump administration, taking place in the peak of the “millennial” generation, is part of a phenomenon that has never been seen in American history. During the beginning of this “millennial” generation, popular support was believed to shift from the Republican party to the Democratic party, yet when a new generational wave of

“One may be making a virtuous decision when choosing the lesser of two evils, but one will still find himself stuck with an evil choice.” Many Americans today find themselves in this predicament when concerning the two possible choices for President of the United States. On one hand you have Hillary Clinton who the Federal Bureau of Investigations labeled “careless” and “grossly negligent” in the handling of America's top secret information. To the contrary you have Donald Trump who has said “he would like to ban all muslims”. Both of these examples merely scratch the surface on the quality of these two candidates. Correspondingly many Americans agree that neither Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton are fit to be President of the United States.

Have you ever waited to hear important news that could change not only you, but also the lives of others in an instant, but constant confusion left you anxious as the weeks went by? This happened in the 2000 presidential election between Texas Governor George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore. It was one of the closest presidential elections ever, but it also sparked controversy.

Not many people really expected Trump to win, especially the democratic party. Throughout the presidential election of 2016 Trump was rude, inappropriate, and unprofessional. Now, Trump is president he is acting the same way. An important person in our government should not be acting the same way a child would. Recent actions by President Trump are substandard and disagreeable; impeachment is the way to handle the situation.

Between the Democratic candidates, Hilary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, we as a country have seen a large difference between their voters. Both candidates, although having similar views, attract extremely different voters. According to demographics and from what I have witnessed in my own hometown, Sanders attracts young voters, most from the “Millennial Generation,” while Clinton attracts older voters. In reference to an Iowa entrance poll, “Sanders surpassed Hilary Clinton 84% to 14% among Democrats aged 17 to 29…while Clinton won among voters aged 45 and older.” The age gap between the candidates’ voters has had a prevalent impact on what issues may lead them to choose one and not the other. With Sanders political views and promises as President, he most likely has a large amount of

Donald Trump 's victory in the 2016 presidential election took many people by surprise. Pollsters, political analysts, news anchors and even celebrities expressed shock that a Washington outsider could triumph over a candidate with Hillary Clinton 's history in politics. Clinton and Trump expressed views throughout their campaigns that were in direct opposition, including their opinions on the Dodd-Frank Act, the legislation that spawned the controversial Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. As you may know, the CFPB has proposed sweeping new regulations for short-term, small-dollar installment loans that could effectively eliminate these types of loans. Although the Dodd-Frank and the CFPB have received a great deal of support from President Obama as well as Clinton, Trump has repeatedly vowed to "dismantle" both the agency and the Dodd-Frank. This has led to speculation that Trump 's election may be a death blow to Obama 's plan to kill non-collateralized personal installment loans.

There will be a U.S. presidential election on November 8, 2016. Whether you identify as a Republican, a Democrat, or somewhere in between, there is no denying that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are two highly controversial candidates. While it is difficult to tell where most Americans stand on the election issue, it is easy to see that ancient Chinese Legalist thinkers would be staunch supporters of Donald Trump. Legalist ideas seem to be the foundation upon which Trump’s Republican Party was built. Even Trump’s slogan, “Make America Great Again,” is echoed in the Legalist notion of becoming a strong country with impenetrable borders. Though I, along with many Americans, disagree with Trump on many points, his tax and welfare policies seem to be based on logic, especially in the context of Chinese history. However, America is not ready for a president who has illustrated such a flagrant disregard for the law. Just as the Legalist regime in China was short-lived, so should be Trump’s time in the limelight.

Back when the 2016 election was full-force, there was one candidate that drew in younger voters more than any other. He was a 76-year-old career politician. This man was Bernie Sanders, and even though my peers and good ol’ Sanders were insurmountably distant in age, he understood the political culture of the United States’ youth. He discussed issues that affected the kids of our future, such as education,