Presidential Elections And The Political Integration Of Data Analytics Essay

After research-filled, highly targeted, and negative campaigns, the results of the 2016 Presidential Election stunned the world. But were these results really all that surprising? America was prepared for a change in policy and election projections were incorrect due to the fact that there existed many “under cover Trumpers”, whom voted their conscience but were not willing to openly admit their political beliefs for fear of condemnation. The 2016 Presidential Election results open many areas for research into the legitimacy of the Electoral College, civic engagement, and campaign strategies as well as raises concerns over the fear American people possessed in defending their political values.

The 2016 presidential election seemed to be a particularly hectic election. On November 8,2016, I was checking my Facebook newsfeed. As I scrolled through my newsfeed, I see a lot of posts related to the election. People would post opinions on each of the presidential candidates as well as which their predictions of which candidate will win. The newspaper websites provided frequent updates throughout the day to inform people about the progress of the election. That night, I watched tentatively as the ballots were being counted, and I saw people’s comments of shock and disbelief when Trump managed to get ahead of Hillary in terms of electoral college votes.

The 2004 presidential election was a re-election year, with current President George Bush with the republican ticket and as the democratic representative was John Kerry, Senator from Massachusetts. While the country watched the election and debates get underway, they decided that the candidates stance on the war in Iraq, terrorism, and the economy would be the separating difference of who would take office. As America watched the campaigns play out, they were finally able to decide on November 2, 2004 who would be their commander-in-chief. The 2004 election was set on a scene of war in the backdrop, similarly the 1944 election resembled the same scenery. From 1944 to 2004 to 2016, the key issues and the stance of each candidate needed to take

Back in 2000, the presidential election was decided by 537 votes in Florida. According to the New York Times, there were 620,000 Floridians barred from voting that were convicted of a felony, regardless of the crime committed. That’s a large poll of Floridians that didn’t get to exercise their right to vote. Had those 620,000 Floridians voted, the 2000 presidential elections may have had a different outcome. It is very important that all Americans exercise their right to vote to ensure we the people select the right representatives in office. There are certain felony crimes that should absolutely ban those said individuals their right to vote, but there are other crimes that are not as serious that should not impact those said individuals their right to vote. The 2000 elections were just and example of how

Democrat Ralph Northam's victory in the 2017 Virginia gubernatorial election means the newly elected governor will most likely continue to advocate for increased access to Medicaid, which will help ensure that the poor will have more health care coverage. Northam is also a doctor, and has used his experience in the medical industry to inform his political views on health care. He believes that increased coverage through government programs such as Medicaid can help ensure that people do not face economic disadvantages when they become ill. Without government assistance, many poor families cannot afford to get sick, due to the high costs of medical care.

The 2016 election was one that certainly deviated from what most people think of when they think of a “typical” election. This election was a deeply partisan election that became more about disliking the other candidate than voting on issues or for a specific candidate. The 2016 Presidential Election surprised many experts, according to most polls and experts this election was supposed to be a landslide victory for Hillary Clinton, but due to the Democratic Party being out of touch with the working-class and Midwest voters Donald Trump was able to upset Hillary Clinton to win the election.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, millions of Americans, and many more around the world, woke up to heart-wrenching news of a horrific magnitude. Two planes had collided into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York, a third rammed into the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and yet a fourth crash-landed in Philadelphia. All victims of this carefully planned act of terrorism, several hundreds of innocent lives were lost in the direct assaults on the planes, a couple of thousand more were injured or killed from the damage caused by the attacks, and hundreds more were sacrificed in the rescue attempts.[1] It is unthinkable that such a large scale operation could have been

The data obtained for this project has been gathered from the American National Election Studies, better known for short as “ANES.” Before continuing it is best to give some background information of the American National Election Studies, and why they are a reliable source for information. From the ANES website, they explain, “The mission of the American National Election Studies is to inform explanations of election outcomes by providing data that support rich hypothesis testing, maximize methodological excellence, measure many variables, and promote comparisons across people, contexts, and time” (ANES). ANES is a reliable source for data because it is used by many other social scientists. Many experiments conducted by other researchers have relied solely on the data from the American National Election Studies. The data source that is being used throughout this paper, are results from the American National Election Studies data file for 2012 (ANES, 2012). The ANES is an academic survey and a reputable source, which allows for investigation into how variables such as income, race and education has an impact on party identification.

The rapid improvement of technology in the last few decades is beyond incredible; it has significantly changed the pattern of interaction among individuals. Less than fifteen years ago, carrying a cell phone that was bigger than a block would make you appear in control of the world. The same world that today asks Siri, if Donald Trump was wearing a toupee in last night’s presidential debate. To its simplicity, individuals must adjust to the latest innovations and advancements. Comparable, politicians are obligated to rethink their campaign strategy, according to the current technology and developments. In other words, Hilary Clinton’s campaign cannot and will not be the same as Bill Clinton 's. Why not? Because voter 's attention is not

The two questions identified above cannot be adequately answered alone without one influencing the other because a campaign that influences the election of the most powerful position in the world is a public event. However, after months of predictions of a too-close-to-call contest, Bush won nationwide balloting making him the 15th president elected to a second term and the first to win both a majority of the popular vote and the Electoral College since his father in 1988. The GOP also extended its majorities in the House and Senate.

The Constitution excludes a substantial number of American citizens from the democratic process. Approximately four million Americans residing in the U.S. territories lack voting rights and full voting representation in Congress; consequently, creating a second-class citizenship with partial constitutional rights. These policies articulate the historically silenced voices of the people of the U.S. territories by their "democratic" government. However, amending the Constitution does not come without consequence: political pressures will maintain U.S. territory policy, fostering resentment and inequality, and lowering the standards necessary to sustain a democratic society, leaving the people of the U.S. territories less efficient

In the 58th Presidential Election both candidates face major criticism for their views on certain issues that the country as a whole is divided on. This year’s major Presidential candidates are Republican nominee Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. One of the major issues that is prevalent in this election is gun control and how each candidate views gun control, and also how they will handle it if they become the next President of the United States. The other major issue that is also prevalent in this election is the candidates’ views on abortion legality and whether or not abortion will still be legal once the next President takes office in January. This election can be described as nothing other than a confrontational one since the entire country is currently divided between both candidates. The current nominees are facing a lot of backlash and this election has been one for the books considering many people have referred to their most favorable candidate as “the lesser of two evils”. Without a doubt this election will be a memorable one no matter who wins due the fact that the nation is severely divided and the end result may result in even more problems within our nation.

Since our nation’s beginning, we've used the same election process. On the surface, the process seems to work well, and we're used to it. However, nothing is without fault, and this process is no exception. If you look closely, you'll notice some things about American elections that'll make you think there are aspects we need to improve. Overall, I think our election process is effective, but needs to be more fair.

In the upcoming 2016 presidential election, American citizens are not only choosing a candidate to become the next president and the leader of the United States, America is voting on a specific direction on many controversial topics that will become the foundation and future of this country. There are two very opposing candidates, Republican, Donald Trump, and Democrat, Hillary Clinton. Many people believe that this election is coming down to choosing between the lesser evil. However, Hillary Clinton’s professionalism and answers to numerous tough questions make her the best candidate to not only be the president, but to be the first woman president in all of the U.S. history.

Business thrive when they have the most accurate, up-to-date, and relevant information at their disposal. This information can be used for a plethora of pertinent markers in small and large businesses, relating to accounting, investments, consumer activity, and much more. Big data is a term used to describe the extremely large amounts of data that floods a business every day. For decades, big data has been a growing field, facing controversy on many levels, but as of late, it has been a major innovator in the challenge of making businesses more sustainable. Big data is often scrutinized for its over-generalization and inability to display meaningful results at times. When applied correctly, data analysis can bring earth-altering information to the table.