Presidential Powers: Constitutional vs. Institutional

1207 Words5 Pages
Presidential Powers: Constitutional vs. Institutional The American Presidency is one of the greatest seats of political power in the Western World. As the Chief Executive of the governmental and bureaucratic bodies charged with serving the public interest, the President is granted a broad range of powers and jurisdictions. However, the U.S. Constitution was also designed with the intent of creating sensible limitations on this power such that the executive branch might be balanced by the roles of the legislative and judicial branches. This critical system of checks and balances is intended to define certain authorities as being vested in the presidency by the Constitution and other authorities as being tempered by the critical role of others. However, as this discussion will demonstrate, the presidency has also historically armed itself with certain powers that are extrapolated from or even genuinely undermining to emergent or existing legislation. This denotes the critical contrast between the Constitutional powers granted the presidency and the Institutional powers that the presidency has generally created and expanded across a series of office-holders. This is the subject at the center of the following discussion, which considers the implications of these variances in executive authority. First and foremost to understanding the limitations created for the presidency are the two doctrines underlying the U.S. Constitution. As the document itself was chartered in
Open Document