Dahal's Proposal To Amend The Constitution

Proportionality is a key factor in assessing the fairness of a voting system, if a parties number of votes is not equal or close to their number of seats in parliament then the voters’ are being misrepresented. AMS is a PR system, which results in a party’s

India has a multi-party political system and those political parties "have different understandings" as the recent debate over the China-India border issue has demonstrated (China blames India's

Unfortunately, no matter how good the intent of those running for positions of leadership, whether in their community or in the national government, politics have a way of corrupting or inconveniencing even the most upstanding of citizens. For instance, when Congress is presented with a bill to vote upon, each senator and representative must not only vote based upon their personal ideology in regards to the bill, but must also consider other factors such as support from their constituents and even support of the president. It slowly gravitates from a decision based upon what they believe, to a decision based upon how badly they want to risk their position of power in the government. This is the very essence of a flawed democracy! This is the very reason why rhetoric and deceit and empty promises enter politics. Members of the government lose their ideological convictions and give into the mindset of megalomaniacs. Elected officials get so caught up in the “politics”, that they ignore any idea of compromise and solution, and stubbornly hold to their party’s stance on issues, doing anything to keep their seat. The willingness to compromise – something critical to the success of democratic government - has collapsed; the most likely explanation being the growing confidence, arrogance even, of the defenders of inequality and oligarchy. They believe they are winning and see no need for compromise. And that view, which may be tactically accurate, destabilizes the unending cooperation between conservatives and liberals that democracy

Justice Nariman’s judgment shows us that with the right kind of conviction, it is possible to uncover the importance of free speech as a value unto itself within our larger constitutional scheme. That the court has defended the Constitution’s ideals of tolerance with a sense of vivacity and integrity, and that it has provided the jurisprudence of free speech with an enhanced and rare clarity, must give us hope. It must allow us to believe that we can now challenge the noxious culture of censorship that pervades the Indian state. It also shows us that we do not need an American style First Amendment to achieve liberal ideals; what we require, as the court has demonstrated here, is a government that confirms to our own Constitution, which, when

The stubborn antagonism of the Opposition party featuring multiple left-of-center parties such as the Socialists proved to be an ever present obstacle in the attempt of the council to integrate varied and objective membership for the sake of political reliability. The Opposition Party feared the danger that reactionaries would present by taking advantage of the growing pressure for constitutional revision to slip in changes unfavorable to democratic principles supported by its members (“Constitution Research Council”, Nippon Times, May 18, 1956, p.

At least 2 parties. This case is about two parties such as Sonia and Sam.

Lift the restrictions on political participation and voting rights of minorities, including not to punish the people participate in peaceful political activities

Gunay Alibeyli Written Assignment 1 Constitution is a superior law of any country and other laws are made on basis of it. That is why amending the constitution is a very crucial issue. The question can appear that “Why do we need amendment?”The word “amendment” itself means correction or improvement. Every constitution needs improvement in order to accommodate new political or social changes, in other word no modern country can live with an “old” constitution.

Majority rule government and participatory administration are prominent political ideas in this day and age. Reasonable and free decisions are the key pre-essential of vote based system. Be that as it may, vote based system needs substance unless the constituent procedure is combined with the amazingness of the constitution, the principle of law, and common and political rights and flexibilities for the general population. The state must practice the guideline of equivalent citizenship independent of religion, rank, ethnicity and provincial foundation. It should likewise guarantee correspondence of chance to just for headway in social, financial and political areas and surety security of life and property of its subjects.

The other 10% of the country is tenaciously held by minority opposition groups led by

Firstly, in this proposal, the different features of the main alternative electoral systems will be outlined along with the judgement of whether the Conservative party should advocate or oppose the respective system, in addition to ordering the preferences of the following systems. To begin with, the main alternatives, in terms of electoral reform, are mixed-member proportional (MMP) and preferential or ranked ballot where the former has proportionality as the formula and the latter usually has majority as the threshold. In addition, there is also the current electoral system, the first-past-the-post system (FPTP), which depends on having plurality as the threshold. As such, opposing electoral reform is key to retaining power because

My presentation was based on my previous work experience where I worked as Program Coordinator. The name of the organization is Public Welfare Society Nepal (PWSN) which is located in a rural part of Nepal. Since its establishment in 1990, PWSN has been working in different fields such as health, education, brain drain, environment, agriculture, rural reconstruction, peace-building, community empowerment, and so forth. PWSN has been collaborating with several international organizations (INGOs) for a number of programs. PWSN is fascinating different professionals from different fields for new work. PWSN not only acts as planners but also implements of development plans at the local level. PWSN is helping with mobilizing the local resources to the development growth. This organization is supporting for building a self-reliant sustainable society. The best role of this organization is to mediate between the government and local people. PWSN is also playing an important role to reduce ethnic conflict by launching rural community participatory programs.

The khalisthan movement for a better and republic state for Punjab was still going on, opposing this were the Indian congress party, which was dominated by Indira Gandhi and her son Sanjay Gandhi. In 1977, Indira asked Sanjay to break the khalidad in the province of Punjab.

Nepal is an Asian country slightly larger than the U.S. state of Iowa, nestled between China and India (Nepal 's Geographic Challenge, 2015). While Nepal is a small country, it boasts a population of 28.17 million people (Nepal, 2015a), larger than the state of Texas with a population of 26.5 million people (State facts, 2012). Within its borders, this little country of Nepal hosts a vast and dynamic variety of ethnic and cultural diversity. While Nepal is home to over 60 of these ethnic groups, approximately 18 of them have a population index of over one percent each of the population. These groups can be intermixed, geographically separated, or even caste separated, all depending on where in

Nepal’s geography has made Nepal economically dependent on India as it is surrounded on three sides by India and on one (to its north) with the Himalayan range and the region of Tibet. After the devastating earth-quake in Nepal, the country was hit by another humanitarian crisis this time due to a blockade at a crucial crossing on the border with India, which halted oil and other essential supplies landlocked Nepal obtains from its giant neighbor. The unveiling of a new constitution in late September sparked tensions between the Madhesi ethnic group and the government. The Madhesi and Tharu (ethnic group) people, who account for many of the southern residents of Nepal, had been protesting their lack of inclusion in the new