preview

Survival In The Holocaust By Primo Levi

Decent Essays

The holocaust proved that sense of right and wrong is able to change in extreme facts or conditions (that surround someone). Traditional sense of right and wrong stopped being so within the sharp-spiked wire of the concentration camps. Within the camps, prisoners were not treated like humans and therefore changed (for improvement) animal-like behavior necessary to survive. The "ordinary moral world" (86) Primo Levi refers to in Survival in Auschwitz, stops to exist; the meanings and applications of words like "good," "evil," "just," and "unfair" begin to join together and the differences between these polar opposites become unclear.

To survive in Auschwitz needed/demanded a purging of one's self-respect and human self-respect/built-in worth. …show more content…

[_(...] He is a survivor: he is the most able to change, the human type most suited to this way of living" (97). This insane man, Elias, does not hold/hide/give shelter to pre-understood/created ideas/plans of "(usual/ commonly and regular/ healthy) sense of right and wrong," allowing him to suffer without breaking down/getting worse (related to the mind and brain). His mad mind doesn't understand/create justice, and therefore he can work without sad complaint. The (ability to change) of the mind is extremely important to survival in Auschwitz, and application of this adaption to physical pain and suffering is of equal importance.

The physical pains, caused by both forced labor and animal-like beatings, joined/connected with disgusting and terrible conditions, make living in the Lager with human self-respect/built-in worth and self respect a very hard challenge. In order to survive such extremely dirty conditions one must force oneself to use the pain and suffering as stimuli for survival; one must not complain/suffer on the unpleasant nature of certain discomforts but rather reflect, no matter how very hard to understand/create, on how it could be …show more content…

Such is the nature of this inner-camp (place where people buy things). The (confusion about what's right and what's wrong) of the (place where people buy things) is summed up by Levi in the text: "theft in Buna, punished by the civil (ability to make wise decisions), is approved and encouraged by the SS; theft in camp, very much/very badly controlled and hidden by the SS, is carefully thought about/believed by the people not in the military as an (usual/ commonly and regular/ healthy) exchange operation; theft among the Haftlinge is generally punished, but the punishment strikes the thief and the victim with equal gravity" (86). With so many different opinions/points of view of what is good and evil, just and unfair, it would be almost impossible to see what is right. Therefore, the prisoners are left to do what they must to

Get Access