Princess Diana Rhetorical Analysis or Reports Essay

Diana, Princess of Wales was considered the people’s princess. She married Prince Charles, son of Queen Elizabeth II, of England in 1981. When they divorced in late 1996 the people were heart broken over the affair that Prince Charles had with Camilla Parker Bowles. Princess Diana led the same life she had been, she continued her charity work and her love life. The tragedy that left the country in tears and the world in disbelief, ended with unanswered questions which people turned into conspiracy theories. Princess Diana was killed in an attempt to keep the country 's secrets safe.

The mystery surrounding the death of the beloved Princess Diana has sparked an exhaustive investigation by theorists. There is many thoughts on her death, but there are also many facts everyone agrees with. For example, Diana’s death took place on August 31st, 1997 in Paris, France (Paprocki 100). That night Diana had enjoyed a romantic meal with her

“Carry out a random act of kindness, with no reward, safe in the knowledge that one day someone might do the same for you.” (Princess Diana) These were the words left behind by the notorious Diana, Princess of Wales. Princess Diana was one of the most influential women to ever live, even after her death. She was loved by people all over the world, so when the news that she had died in a car accident spread across the entire planet, everyone was devastated. How could the princess be dead, just like that? No one could fathom the thought of her being gone from an accidental wreck; she was a godly figure. There had to be a part of the story that was kept from the public. Many conspiracy theories revolving around her death rose to the surface. The first was that it was a paparazzi chase gone horribly wrong. The second was that the British royal family had her murdered, with the assistance of the British Intelligence Service. The last theory was that Prince Charles, her ex-husband, had her killed so she was out of

Queen Elizabeth open her speech establishing her relationship with her troops in a warm and affectionate tone. She utilises compassion to counteract the severity of Spanish invasion which she addresses in the sentences that follow. She does this to quell her troop concern about the invasion and

Because of these three rhetorical devices, Thatcher’s eulogy appeals to the emotions of her audience. It reflects the loss of a singular dedicated, and hardworking man, who brought peace during times of war and

This balance between contradictory images, and suitably formal writing style helps to make the speech so powerful. He uses pronouns like "we", and "our" which unite the audience, making them feel like the whole nation is grieving with them. The pronouns shift, as he speaks to Diana herself, "you brightened our lives", then again, towards then end of the speech, to "I".

Princess Diana is considered to be the most favored member of the Royal Family in the history of the British Monarchy (biography.com editors 1). She is the former wife of Prince Charles, and the mother of Princes William and Harry. Her charitable work with impoverished children has formed her reputation as a role model for the people of Britain and much of the world. Much of Diana’s life has been devoted to traveling the world to help others. Her work in Africa with the children injured by landmines brought her into the global spotlight (Wexford 3). Princess Diana was more than just a public figure and royal, she was a loving person who brought light to social issues and cared for those who are destitute.

Elizabeth’s relationship with her people is built on faith and love, not fear or tyranny. In the beginning of her speech she addresses the soldiers as "My loving people." She refers to her troops as "faithful" and "loving," showing the appreciation and loyalty that she has for her soldiers. She feels she must acknowledge the important bond between herself and her soldiers by showing them that she is not just a distant queen. To assure her troops of her faith in them, she uses logos in her speech to encourage her soldiers to fight for the good of England. For example, she lets them know by saying "... I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects." She uses repetition of the word “I” and “We” to show that she is not just a queen but a fellow Englishman. “…to live or die amongst you all; to lay down, for my God, and for my kingdom, and for my people, my honor and my blood, even the dust”, shows that she is a part of the people and will fight side by side with them to defend their country. This would be the first thing that her soldiers fight for, a people and ruler relationship that is bound by love and trust.

First, the Queen displays her loyalty to her people in order to make the troops understand that she has put her faith in them. This increases the credibility of her argument because it shows that she is not just there because she is the Queen, she is there because she “[does] not desire to live to distrust [her] faithful and loving people”: she has “placed [her] chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and goodwill of [her] subjects.” She wants her audience, the troops, to be inspired to fight loyally with England, so in order to gain their loyalty she shows the troops that she is loyal to them as well, increasing her credibility as the Queen. During this section, she adopts a grateful and reverent tone in order to convince her audience that she is loyal to them and make them feel important to the country.

Princess Diana was an inspiration for many people around the world and used her royalty to highlight major social issues. Diana’s dedication to humanitarian work helped to promote awareness and raise money for a wide range of charitable causes, including her campaign against landmines and her kind hearted approach to the AIDS predicament. Diana crossed boundaries to offer support to casualties and worked hard to change the opinions of the general public, which didn't particularly follow royal protocol because she lead from the heart, not the head.

The audience for this, like him, was grieving. Unlike the Queen’s speech, the eulogy celebrates the Princess’s life more than it mourns her death. Ethos automatically exists in this speech because of the fact that the Earl is Diana’s brother. The audience is able to accept that he is credible because he knew her very well. Lord Spencer appeals the the listener’s pathos when he talks about all of the good things Princess Diana accomplished in her lifetime. He talks about memories he had shared with her which pulls the audience in and makes them feel connected to her. He then bashes the media for “sneering at her genuinely good intentions” (Earl Spencer). There is more pathos used to push anger onto the press at this point and it is driven further after describing Diana as such a good person. The Earl also used logos in his Eulogy as a way of making Diana seem more like a regular person. He reminds the audience of the fact that she struggled with eating disorders to make her more relatable which would make the public love her even

Queen Elizabeth, Diana’s mother-in-law and the grandmother to William and Harry, appears to be the ethos in this article. In the article she says, “So what I say to you now, as your queen and as a grandmother, I say from my heart.” She expresses emotion, pathos, by using the words “sadness,” “initial shock,” “anger,” and “disbelief.” In the article she says, “We have all felt these emotions in these last few days.” She says “we” because the entire world has paid tribute and expressed sadness from the news of Diana’s death. This article expresses logos because she uses dates and times. “This week at Balmoral, we have all been trying to help William and Harry come to terms with the devastating loss that they and the rest of us have suffered.” This article hits the mark because Queen Elizabeth talks about how her and her family feel and how they appreciate all the tributes the world has given them, she stays on the

Thesis: Princess Diana was a very kind hearted woman, noble by blood, famous by marriage, but used her public light in a positive way.

This speech does have a purpose, which is to tell the whole world that Britain is united in grief and respect for Princess Diana. Unlike the previous text this one does a good job because it does not bore reader because the speech has a unique style of not telling its real purpose until the near end which forces people to listen to the whole thing. Also it knows the subject and the occasion and in which the two things interact nicely. Also the Queen knows her audience who are the people shocked by the devastating news. As a speaker the Queen uses soothing tone that make her look like she is just regular person in grief for her grand daughter and does not mention any negative details like, if she were to have one, which would be her rage against the photographers or the press. In conclusion there is not that much criticism for this text because the purpose can be identified really easily by the stylistic phrases and knowing all the key elements of rhetoric. Also one of the most important factors that make this text more effective is the shift from “I” to “Our”, this pronoun is significance because it demonstrate the speaker to connect with others which is a key element in persuasion or speech.

Lady Diana Frances Spencer was born at home on July 1, 1961, in Norfolk, England (Morton 70). Her parents were very ashamed that she was a girl. They wanted a boy very badly to keep the Spencer name (Morton 71). Diana had two older sisters and one younger brother. She was always the closest to her brother, Charles, and admired him strongly (Vickers 160). As a child, Diana was somewhat complicated. Growing up,