Printed Circuits Components for a Jit Factory

Performance cycles can be improved through the use of the 25 percent and 15 percent suppliers. The new suppliers would need to be reliable and punctual. Small deviations create large problems therefore, a higher premium for consistency would be well worth the extra expense in the long term.

Second, always make sure there is an alternative source. As I mentioned before, this is much easier with single source procurement (but not sole source), since other similar suppliers could be able to supply similar products with more or less that same quality as the previous suppliers.

Each alternative must be clearly identified. The key advantages and disadvantages of each alternative must be listed and thoroughly discussed. The compare and contrast (pro and con) assessments of each alternative must be done against the decision criteria previously listed and discussed. A matrix format may be used in order to more accurately compare each of the alternatives. If multiple decision criteria are being used, weighting of each of the criteria must be applied. It is also important to look at the short and long term results of each alternative, and to assess the best, the worst, and the most likely outcomes for each alternative. Qualitative and quantitative analysis will be required. It will also be necessary for the student to use the various supply chain management tools and techniques learned throughout the certificate program to determine those possible outcomes.

A source criterion that would be applicable to any project is supply price. This is the main concern for a firm because it needs to get supplies at the most competitive price. This can be a good basis when selecting a supplier in the short and long term project management process.

2. What ten criteria might affect your selection of resource suppliers and your plans for

Besides, I was looking upon the fluctuations (if any) of the market demand, upon current and new competitors and their strategies as well as for new markets and even new products and suppliers if they could offer better

Identify additional services available to add value to your product. Evaluate the cost of more efficient attachments to your product. Agree the supplier guarantee that it will pack the goods to ensure it arrives intact at destination, to eliminate mistakes of cutting corners on the packaging.

People: The emergence of the triple bottom line has led to companies becoming more aware of how their decisions affect not only employees and customers but those within the community they operate in. To achieve this in an ever changing global world a company needs to create policies and guidelines on how to select suppliers and evaluate performance.

Read Integrative Case 4-61, "Make versus Buy," on pages 151 and 152 of the course text. Assume that you are the general manager (Mr. Walsh) faced with this decision. You have identified the following four alternatives available to Liquid Chemical Co.

In planning for my negotiation, I reviewed the Supplier Payoff Matrix for each of the issues to be resolved. The issues which were likely to offer least resistance were the Electronic Integration and the Inventory. The next issues that were likely to have some pushback were the Quality and lot size. We kept to the last the more contentious issues that included price, volume flexibility, development fees and contract term.

Global business environment has become more unstable, supplier negotiations have taken important new role on helping improve corporate competitiveness. The goal of most supplier negotiations today is no longer just to get the lowest price. It is also to find new and innovative ways to meet a wide variety of business challenges, often by tapping into the knowledge and expertise of the supplier community and a good relationship.

b) Another alternative should be using the negotiation method in order to develop a “win-win” situation. A negotiating party would have to be applied, “When a long period of time is required to produce the items purchased” (p 375). In these circumstances, suitable economic price adjustment clauses must be negotiated. Opportunities for various improvements may develop, such as the new manufacturing methods, new packaging possibilities, substitute materials, new plant layouts, and new tools. Negotiation permits an examination and evaluation of all these potential improvements. Competitive bidding does not. The advantage would be assurance of a long-term business with the Company along with reasonable profit for the supplier and reasonable cost for the buyer.

The second level is applying the traditional level 2 evaluation criteria of quality, quantity, delivery, price, and service. Quality is a main issue Victoria will need to analyze from each supplier. It is important that the supplier cannot only keep up with today’s demands, but also future demands and technology upgrades for their products. An assessment of the supplier’s management and financial aspects will need to be conducted. This will be a good indication of how effective their supply chain is, especially when dealing with multiple tiers of suppliers. Victoria must take into consideration the price quote she received, relative to how many times they can deliver a week and how long it will take them to receive their shipments.

The Competition: Suppliers need to be able to keep costs down, in order to keep

❖ To make sure of availability of parts and other stuff critical and necessary to maintain services that will ensure the customers needs and demands, a good relationship with the suppliers and developers has to be achieved.