Prisoner's Dilemma Examples

In the example scenarios of cases and prosecution dilemmas, I feel all of them go against the legal and ethical professional code of responsibility. All three of these do not follow the acceptable factors to determine whether not to charge as stated by Pollack (2017), “whether the authorized or likely punishment or collateral consequences are disproportionate in relation to the particular offense or the offender and potential collateral impact on third parties, including witnesses or victims; cooperation of the offender in the apprehension or conviction of others” (p. 266). Not only do the scenarios break the factors that prosecutors are able to charge upon, they also break the ethical code of right and wrong. The prosecutor is trying to

The Prisoner’s Dilemma is an extremely popular game and way of thinking about social interactions and also economics. It judges how people work together and against each other. It helps us understand what governs the balance between cooperation and competition in business, in politics, and in social settings. The two players in the game can choose between two moves, either 'cooperate' or 'defect'. The idea is that each player gains when both cooperate, but if only one of them cooperates, the other one, who defects, will gain more. If both defect, both lose. The whole game situation and its different outcomes can be summarised with the example provided below, hypothetical situations are imagined with the example below

Detrimental psychological effects and corrupt decision-making are noticeable outcomes of groupthink situations, and in The Stanford Prison Experiment, both of these factors were found as a result of the experiment. In fact, the presence of these detrimental factors forced the experiment to be concluded before schedule: after six days instead of two weeks. The decision-making processes of the guards were skewed and crooked. This is due to the roles the guards were told to play in addition to the group situation the guards found themselves in. Many guards acted under the impression of a “false unanimity” present within their group, and saw this as justification for their inhumane and

In Catch-22, Heller makes light of World War II by adding humor in which characters are forced to deal with illogical, paradoxical situations that make their life often times harder

Critics of Smith's and Friedman's theories contend that they neglect the need for cooperation and teamwork in society, and that chaos can be avoided only with heavy policing of self-interested behavior. Proponents of the invisible hand counter that individuals will usually pursue cooperation and self-regulation because it is in their own interest.

outcomes. Just as in the single Prisoner’s Dilemma, the prisoners are looking for the best results

For a given ethical dilemma, there is usually a dominant pair. Frequently, more than one must be considered, and sometimes all four. But, as Kidder

Another example of a culturally-based ethical dilemma occurs when collective

Some individual are concerned that their concepts do not allow for moral dilemmas to have more than stability in mind. It is known to be somewhat concerning, that theories that allow for dilemmas failure to be uniquely action-guiding. “A theory can fail to be uniquely action-guiding in two different ways, by suggesting incompatible actions in a situation or by not suggesting any action at all.” (McConnell2014)

Collegiate sports brings in over $6.3 billion a year to universities all over the country. The college coaches are compensated up to seven figure salaries to head the programs. College athletes are not paid one dollar for their contribution for the revenue being brought in to the universities as a result of their performance. There is a strong argument that could be presented by the student athletes and an equally strong case that could be presented by the education institution. There is a scene in the movie “The Program”, a motion picture depicting inside workings of a major college football program. The scene takes place at a team dinner for the team. It shows a wealthy alumni of the university engage a freshman running back in a conversation. He praised him for his performance on the field. Unbeknownst to the student athlete he slips an envelope, which is perceived to be money into his front pocket and walks away. The student athlete played by actor, Omar Epps, came to the school as a highly recruited inner city athlete from a low socio economic background. Depending on your ethical upbringing, you may or may not have perceived this encounter as an illegal exchange. This cinematic portrayal of major college football life is realistic view of what is really taking place or at best has the possibility to happen. The fact that most major college athletes come from low income or broken households. Student

But, in unique circumstances, as is the case “a sort of oligopoly is formed, and in-turn characterized by ethical strategic behavior and mutual interdependence. By all parties utilizing this strategic behavior, simply means self-interest behavior considers the reactions of others. But, because rivals are few, there is mutual

The Prisoner's Dilemma has a large influence from subjectivity. While the objectively ideal situation would be for both prisoners to "cooperate," that is to stick to the story they both created before interrogation, each prisoner is driven by subjectivity in regards to personal self interests should they choose to "rat each other out." Previous experiences, such as one prisoner having felt slighted by the other prisoner in a previous encounter, may force the prisoner's decision to divvy out retribution through "justice" to mend wrongdoing by turning his co-criminal

By acting to further the interests of the other, one serves one’s own interests as well. We should, therefore, insofar as we are rational, develop within ourselves the dispositions to constrain ourselves when interacting with others. We should become "constrained maximizers" (CMs) rather remain the “straightforward maximizers” (SMs) that we would be in a State of Nature (167)". " Per Gauthier, when interacting in Prisoner’s Dilemma-like situations, where the actions of others can affect one’s own outcome, and vice versa, rationality shows that one’s own interest is best pursued by being cooperative, and therefore agents rationally dispose themselves to the constrain the maximization of their own utility by adopting principles of morality.

Ethical egoism claims that all our actions can be reduced to self-interest. This is a controversial moral theory which sometimes can be detrimental. Without a well-defined framework of the nature of self-interest, ethical egoism enlarges the animalistic nature of humanity in which can result in unfavorable consequences. Ethical egoism also fails to provide a solution when a conflict of interest arises. By only acting out of one’s self

In a capitalistic society such as that of America, individual success is often put before that of the entire group. In many instances this behavior creates an atmosphere of competition within the group, ultimately elevating the performance of each individual. However, in some instances, the interests of the group clash with those of the individual. As occurred in the article, "Fishing Til the Pond is Empty" fisherman as a group had conflicting views with those of individual fisherman comprising the group. In one instance, individual fishermen want to capture as many fish as possible to earn the maximum amount of money. In another instance, the group suffers as the entire population of fish is quickly eroding away through greedy behavior. This contentious issue gives rise to the question: Is the group or individual interests more important?