Privacy Is Not A Right To Facebook Analysis

The privacy of human being has drastically changed with the advent of internet. On a scale of 1 to 10, the privacy of an internet user is a -1 or may be less. Social Networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace etc are mainly responsible for this privacy leakage. This short paper is dedicated to review the change of privacy policy by Facebook on December 2009 and its impact on public privacy and security.

It is shown, that one of the most prominent sources that prove a danger toward privacy, is through social media, specifically Facebook. This site alone

As a nation, we have had many first-hand experiences with terrorism and violence. The pain and suffering we are put through as a nation, people tend not to consider being subjected to government surveillance. Our security from future terrorist attacks is vital, then again, not as vital as our privacy. People shouldn’t be so quick to sacrifice their privacy rights, to allow the government to monitor national security. Giving the government the power of invading our privacy, creates an effortless way for them to violate their power and strip citizens of their constitutional rights. People will argue that the price one has to pay for safety, is giving up their rights to privacy. As Benjamin Franklin once said, “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” (Independence Hall Association). In other words, those willing to give up their privacy for security, deserve neither. We the people, those who assemble this nation, should not allow the government to invade our privacy or void our 4th amendment right.

INC.com released an article weighing the sides of the case. The article embraced the Federal Trade Commission V. Twitter Case to be held to FTC’s advantage. The article states the FTC’s regulations for online data management and intent of use of the data. The FTC is crossing major boundaries in security control as, “[the] case was the FTC's 30th over poor data security, but the first against a social networking service” (Rubin). Rubin believes the commissioner is pushing far too hard with the branching from data security to social networking services. The regulation being practiced is exceeding the limits previously intended for the commission's authority over privacy matters. Rubin states the progression of the involvement of the FTC and concludes “[the] case against Twitter is the FTC's attempt to codify laws and regulations that don't otherwise exist on the books," (Rubin). The involvement and authority of the Federal Trade Commision with privacy laws in this article correlates with the big brother privacy metaphor. The FTC is seen as the dominant figure in privacy regulation. The data and means of what can be done with data is controlled by the powerful authority of the FTC, giving readers a sense of continuous lurking and

Dvorak’s argument is of little conjecture. While the text starts by commenting on Facebook’s “cavalier lack of concern over privacy issues, it continues down a completely different path, criticizing the users instead. This falsely-led introduction brings the readers to believe that the article is about privacy concerns instead of the ignorant mannerisms of the people using it.

Acquisti and Gross point out that the unprecedented growth of online social networks including but not limited to Facebook and MySpace has brought with itself serious security and privacy concerns. In this particular study, the authors found out that privacy issues do not discourage individuals from being members of the network. Further, the authors also found out that even individuals who happen to be rather concerned about their privacy reveal a great deal of their personal information after joining the network. This study is highly relevant to my research as it clearly demonstrates that individuals do not take privacy issues seriously on joining Facebook. As the authors point out, the study in this case secured its support from the "CMU Berkman Faculty Development Fund, CMU CyLab and the Data Privacy Laboratory." Thus in addition to being relevant, the study can also be regarded credible.

In Terms and Conditions May Appeal by Cullen Hoback, he wanted the world to be aware of what people really agree to when they hit the I agree button on a website or account. Hoback wants people to be aware of how much privacy they do not have on social network sites or on anything they google, basically anything digitized. He shows the people what the CIA and NSA hid from people everyday about their privacy. He talks to different professors from colleges and even people from the CIA and NSA about how much privacy people actually have. One of the most popular social networking sites is facebook, which Hoback talks to Mark, the founder of facebook, about privacy. Mark does not tell much about privacy, but feels relieved when he thinks Hoback stopped filming. Hoback states, “Privacy is dead” (Hoback). I agree.

At first I agreed wholeheartedly that Facebook sells their clients’ information to businesses and potentially the government itself, after all Google is known to do the same with their search engine. However after I thought and analyzed the language he uses to describe how Facebook uses their “transparency”, I realize that he may very well be overblowing the situation.

Federal government regulate only certain areas, leaving it to the Internet user to avoid unwanted data collection or use and the private companies to apply protective privacy policies that are followed. It is very difficult to determine where to draw the line to prevent unwanted use and storage of consumer information and how best to protect a person’s online privacy while leaving room for freedom of speech and e-commerce for Web site owners and online advertisers.

The privacy compliance recommends that companies like Facebook should adopt a comprehensive privacy program that is reasonably designed to protect the privacy and security to prevent predictable risks. Another important idea is to abide by the Federal Trade Commission’s rules about keeping their advertising from being misleading and deceptive. Also, an opt-in consent form must be provided to the consumers that their data will be kept private. Overall, any type of changes a company possesses should be disclosed clearly to the

“The world of privacy has changed, and Canada’s laws need to keep up. Personal information has been called the oil of the digital economy and as companies drill for more data, the risk to privacy are growing exponentially.” After an investigation conducted in 2009 prompted by a complaint filed from the Canadian Policy and Public Interest Clinic, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner has concluded that Facebook’s current practices of third party applications do not comply with Canadian Privacy Laws. The Commissioner’s concerns include inadequate disclosure to users about what is being disclosed, lack of consent, and lack of control over personal information with third-party developers. With these findings, the Commissioner has proposed several recommendations for Facebook to take on, however the company has refused to comply. In this paper I will argue that the Office of Privacy Commission requires stronger enforcement powers in ordering Facebook to change its third party application practices in order to effectively protect consumers personal information.

Perhaps one of the greatest innovations of the past decade has been the Internet. With the rise of the digital age, mass media has become a paradox to both public and private communication forums. Online dating sites allow individuals to connect and reconnect with loved ones. Nonetheless, the advantages of this platform bring modern threats towards our personal privacy. Privacy is essential to human dignity, autonomy, and security. Privacy is the ability to have control over information about oneself and their own visibility: it’s a fundamental right that shouldn’t reshape our relationship to privacy or generate self-censorship. The controversy surrounding the extent of privacy protection on sites such as ChristianMingles.com and AshleyMadison.com

Facebook is a well know social networking site that has taken all over the world with over 500 million people using the site. Social networking sites such as Facebook share information about the user over the Internet, where it can be freely accessed by anyone. This is where issues of privacy to the individual arise. As of July 2010 Facebook has more than 500 million active users, Users may create a personal profile, add other users as friends and exchange messages, including automatic notifications when they update their profile. As of December last year, Facebook called its 500 million users to review their privacy settings at the launch of its new user control tools which allow the user to control their information easily depending on

The marketing industry is an elaborate network that links companies to their consumers, primarily through written communication. The main objective of marketing is to identify trends and patterns in consumer behavior, and utilize the data to influence consumers to purchase more goods. From a macroenviroment standpoint, the general conditions of a market are heavily dependent on global environmental factors. The most significant factor that influences the markets today is technological advancements. Since the release of Facebook, Linked-in, Twitter, and Myspace in the early 2000s, the number of people using social media has increased to over sixty-five percent. The ever-growing dependency on social media platforms, has given marketers the tremendous opportunity to further market potential consumers. Social media marketing is a specific form of marketing that focuses on producing ad content that social media users will post on their own networks. This particular marketing technique is effective because ads and content are created, based on what personal information users post on social media. Firms and organizations that advertise their brands on social media are more likely to increase their customer base and annual revenue. By doing so, companies are able to increase exposure of their brand and widen previous hidden, customer bases. As a marketer, the fine line between right and wrong is often blurred. The amount and

Social networking sites such as Twitter or Facebook have created a new ethical dilemma for many businesses. Corporations, small businesses, and even universities are struggling create policies to manage their employees social networking behaviors. Social networking access, particularly for recruiters, can provide personal information about potential employees, which would otherwise not be available. A business must follow statutes and guidelines when disclosing information to the public. Individuals on social networking sites have no such constraints. Employees can and do make comments about their employers online. Employers can and do watch what employees post online. Any individual can send or post potentially damaging information