Privacy Vs National Security

The need to protect National Security is far more important than individual privacy. The greatest part of living in the United States of America is the freedom that we have. That freedom and the right to live freely is protected by various government agencies. From time to time, the privacy a person has may have to be invaded to guarantee the security of the country and other citizens. Everyone has the right to not have their life controlled by the government, but it has the right to make sure that citizens are not doing anything to threaten the security of

Defining National Security VS Personal Privacy is a matter of looking at the basic nature of each. From research collected there is a consensus that we need balance. Too much of one hurts the other and vise versa. There are a couple of articles that range from Civil Liberties to the birth of public right to know that support the overall claim. Talks about the effects of censorship in different situations like war and peace will help prove that a balance needs to be forged. The problem here isn’t the definition of personal vs national security, but the survival of each in light of each other. There is history in our nation

During the past decade, an issue has arisen from the minds of people, on which is more important? Privacy or national security? The problem with the privacy is that people do not feel they have enough of it and national security is increasing causing the government to be less worried about the people. National security is growing out of control which has led to the decrease in people’s privacy and has created fear in the eyes of U.S. citizens. “Twelve years after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and amid a summer of revelations about the extent of the surveillance state built up to prevent others, leaders, experts and average Americans alike are searching for the right balance between security and privacy” (Noble). Americans should be able to live their daily lives without fear of an overpowered government or a “big brother” figure taking over. “According to a CBS News poll released Tuesday evening, nearly 6 in 10 Americans said they disapproved of the federal government’s collecting phone records of ordinary Americans in order to reduce terrorism” (Gonchar). While it is good to keep our country safe with security, American’s privacy should be more important because there is a substantial amount of national security, the people 's rights should matter first.

Privacy is what allows people to feel secure in their surroundings. With privacy, one is allowed to withhold or distribute the information they want by choice, but the ability to have that choice is being violated in today’s society. Benjamin Franklin once said, “He who sacrifices freedom or liberty will eventually have neither.” And that’s the unfortunate truth that is and has occurred in recent years. Privacy, especially in such a fast paced moving world, is extremely vital yet is extremely violated, as recently discovered the NSA has been spying on U.S. citizens for quite a while now; based on the Fourth Amendment, the risk of leaked and distorted individual information, as well as vulnerability to lack of anonymity.

Individual Privacy vs. National Security is something that many people have argued for years. Many people have forgotten what a disturbance September 11, 2001 was to everyone in America. This was the day that 2,992 lives were stolen in the attacks by the Taliban on U.S. soil. Due to this attack the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) along with the Federal Government has put in place many new security regulations. Many people have lost touch with why these regulations were put in place. As well, many people have lost touch with why TSA is using full body scanners and other security devices.

As stated above, privacy rights are considered an essential part of one’s everyday life because everyone has their own definition of privacy, in other words, everyone has to have their own form of privacy; Google defined privacy as “the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people” but to some people privacy is what one does by themselves or what they do with another person(s). According to the Patriot Act, the Government has the right to implement all types of instruments that will further "protect" the country from terrorism by imposing extreme actions that target certain rights, such as privacy. In today’s society, teenagers and all people around the world is constantly on their phone either updating a status on Facebook or posting a new picture on Instagram, this could be very detrimental in protecting one’s own private life; photos and status updates may uncontrollably reveal one’s personal life, such as a school’s location or even a house address. Essentially giving the criminal a “treasure map.” Furthermore the government should enact a law that gives some type of privacy right while the right of privacy is a debatable subject, citizens should not fear their government from taking away their right or abuse it for the "good-will of the people."

Since the terrorist attack of 9/11, America has been in a high level conflict with terrorist around the world, particularly the group known as Al Qaeda. There has been many discussions within the U.S. Congress about the measures of how to effectively combat this organization and their members, here and abroad. Consequently, the issue of individual privacy vs. national security has generated discussions within the civilian and government sectors. To date, the discussions continues with many private citizens who feels they are constantly losing their privacy , when

National Security is More Important than Privacy. Even though increasing security will end up violating several of the rights we, as American citizens have been given, our lives as Americans are more precious than our rights in the Constitution. The US government should do anything to protect us, because the government is lessening the number of terrorist attacks on US ground as much as possible. The US government is finding ways of protecting us as citizens without violating our privacy.

I believe national security is more important than privacy because it lowers the threat of terrorism and ensures the safety of the American people. Even though national security includes the invasion of citizen’s privacy, if it could prevent a national crisis, why shouldn’t it be implemented? Many Americans favor privacy over security because they claim it violates their constitutional rights. However, would you rather the government detain a suspected terrorist before an attack like 9/11 happens again or would you rather have it happen and leave your nation defenseless?

When the government decided to spy on its own citizens through their personal devices (cellphones, laptops, etc), they broke the fourth amendment in the attempt to secure the united states. Through our cellphones and other devices, they are able to track our location, finding us if they deem it necessary. Many are in disagreement with this, no one likes the idea of someone being able to see us through our own phones camera at any time of day, regardless if we are doing anything that the government finds

The government is hiding behind the US constitution because it gives them the power to do certain things without the knowledge of the American people. By spying on our conversations, going through our emails and text messages, they think it's a better way to prevent another tragedy. In 2013, Edward J. Snowden, a government contractor, leaked classified documents on how the government gets all its information by the help of the National Security Agency. The question that many ask is our national security more important than our privacy. I believe it varies in different manners, reason why is because not everyone in America had the intention to harm the lives of others but yes that can change throughout time. There is a certain limit that has

What is the relation between freedom vs. security? Should the public sacrifice liberty in the name of security? What is the role of the government in providing that security? In recent years, the notion of freedom and security has been reignited as a forefront of American debate in perhaps the most emphatic fashion. On June 5, 2013, Edward Snowden began perhaps the most significant classified documentation leaks in American history. His disclosures revealed how the U.S. government was collecting metadata from millions of Americans through mass surveillance programs such as PRISM. His reveal sparked a prominent discussion on the proper balance of freedom and security in the American government. In particular, three prominent concepts are illustrated

Security and privacy is a huge debate all throughout our country. Is our security more important than our privacy? 56% of americans say that security is more important. If there is an attack on our country our internet history is not going to save us the National Government will. We just do not don't have weapons to protect us we also have peaceful organizations to help us out. Homeland security protect against terrorist attacks and other threats against our homeland, preparing and planning for emergencies, and investing in strong response and recovery capabilities. An organization may make cyber attacks on certain civilians civilians and guns cannot protect against that. How will the internet protect us? Exactly it cannot!

“There is no doubt that our nation’s security and defeating terrorism trump all other priorities.” The quote by Arlen Specter stresses the importance of a strong and persistent security system in America. After the dreadful events on September 11, 2001, the issue of whether privacy or the nation’s security is more important arose in the United States. Even after fifteen years, this debate is still relevant in politics. Our nation’s security is more important than the citizen’s privacy because lives will be protected and saved, the average person has nothing to hide for the government, and privacy has already been breached.

Let’s say that a terrorist attack took place in the Twin Cities, but the government had the chance to prevent it by breaking a person’s privacy. Do you think the government has the right to invade someone’s privacy to potentially save a lot of lives? Everyone has the right to not have their life controlled by the government, but the government has the right to make sure that citizens are not doing anything to threaten the security of the country. Our freedom also comes at a price; that price is the need of the government to monitor some of the things we do to ensure that the United States is not in danger of a terrorist attack or an attempted overthrow of the government. The most glaring example of how National Security is more important than