Pro Genetic Modification Research Paper

GMOs can cause environmental damage and health problems for consumers. Anti-GMO organization Center for Food Safety said genetic engineering of plants and animals is, potentially. Lallanilla refers to GMO crops as “Frankenfoods.” The long-term effect of GMOs still remains unknown. They have been linked to toxic allergic reactions, sick, sterile and dead livestock, and damage to virtually every organ studied in lab animals.

GM foods are in the middle of many controversial issues; primarily these are addressed by conflicts over the relative pros and cons of GM foods. Major biotech companies like ‘Monsanto ' and ‘Cargill ' are promoting GM foods by focusing only on their beneficial aspects, giving least importance to their negative effects on safety, environment and biodiversity. On the other hand, governmental regulators and nongovernmental organizations, along with some scientists, are strictly opposing this type of blind promotion of GM food by enlightening the people on their negative effects The controversies associated with GM foods include issues such as safety, environmental benefits and risks, biodiversity, and ethical and social considerations.GM foods are implicated for adverse human health risks like people being allergic to it, environmental hazards such as development of super weeds, and pesticide and antibiotic resistance in disease causing organisms. On the other

As said before, GMOs are genetically modified organisms, and can be dangerous, so experts say. They say that the GMO process causes diseases such as cancer or diabetes, and some also say that GM foods can cause allergic reactions. They are saying this because, as they have discovered, some companies have mixed protein from nuts and inserted into beans, which can be harmful

Major labor-saving technological changes of the 20th century gave rise to the industrial processing of food. In the 1950’s and 60’s we saw a rise of supermarkets and the spread of fast-food eateries. The growth of supermarkets and fast-food eateries gave way to a new method of consumption. No longer was food’s route from the local farm or ranch to the

Overuse of roundup results in “super weeds”, resistant to herbicide. This is causing farmers to use even more toxic herbicide every year. However, it not only creates this environmental harm. GMOs foods contain higher residues of toxic herbicides which means it has highly possibility been absorbed in to human body by eating GMO food. In addition, how the herbicide directly linked to the human health. Verma (2011) writes, “Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food, including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system” (p.7). Why those issues had being happened on the human body? And why those issues could directly related to the GMOs food? A very interesting things is the most of farmers would not eat the GMO food, they choose to eat organic food, And 54% said they would choose a conventionally labelled food product and 24% would choose organic if it was available (reporter, 2013). In addition, Herbicides are not

It said to believe that some insects can not ingest some of the crops because they have been genetically modified, therefore; could cause them to not digest properly. Also adding to the list of disadvantages of GMO’s is that this new GM technology could cause some concerns on the changing of our agriculture. It has been proven in some studies that GMO strains have the potential to change agriculture. Another reason for individuals to not be for GMO’s is because they can potential disturb or ruin or environment.They can cause such harm to the environment because of the fact that they are not naturally grown crops, which can complicated all factors of that environment. In addition, the GMO’s crops can cause unwanted residual effects. These crops can leave unwanted residual substances that could remain/ be present in the soil in which it was grown for long extended periods of time. There has been studies to prove that strains of the GM of the crop could have the possibility of remaining in the soil for years, even after the crops have been uprooted. The results from this research even concluded that the maximum of how long the residual could stay inside the soil was up to 5 years. Beyond that particular fact, the GM technology found in GMO’s are said to promote weed growing. Also it was said that,”to keep these new weeds under control, scientists then invented new herbicides that were not necessary for non-GMO weeds. These chemicals are also toxic to various mammals and amphibians, who are feeding on GMO crops. Tests even show that the uptake of these herbicides also has toxic consequences on aquatic ecosystems(greengarageblog.org).” GMO’s also cripple the ablitiy for the crops to have diversity. It is known in nature that many variations of organisms are welcomed, because it is part of their evolutionary trend. Unfortunately, when an individual introduces

Breck Erickson “Based on animal research with GM (genetically modified) foods, the American Academy of Environmental Medicines (AAEM), an international organization of physicians, says that there are serious health risks associated with eating GM foods.” for these reasons we should not allow farmers to use GM products (2011, Smith). Based on many studies there are very many reasons to ban GMOs (Genetically Mortified Organisms). Although there are a few positive effects to GMOs like not having to spray the fields with different herbicides and pesticides, there are also many unfavorable reasons to use and ban GMOs. These include slight differences in yields, the inability to track GMOs in sugars, and the negative health effects.

Over the past 30 years, the field of genetics has blossomed into one of the fastest growing and most funded fields of science around the world. One major breakthrough known as Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) has shifted the way we view DNA and might be the single most important discovery for the future of life on planet Earth. Once there is a better understanding of CRISPR and its CAS9 enzyme, and any potential shortcomings are addressed, the amount of change that CRISPR could make on society could be world changing.

Possibilities of Harm to the Health of the Overall Population due to Introducing GMOs in Food Supply

Genetic modification is a subject that has been hotly debated in the past, and remains a topic of controversy today. There are many critical discussions to be had with genetically modified (GM) products, however, this paper will focus on corn crops that have been modified to incorporate Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) genes. Corn is the largest food crop in the world and Bt corn is one of the largest crops in North America. Bt corn has several benefits, yet, there are also many potential problems with the crop and its impacts on local ecosystems. Although environmental issues may raise concerns, Bt crops have an immense upside with proper management of the Bt gene.

According to the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association, the US National Academy of Sciences, and the British Royal Society, GMOs are safe to eat, even offering vitamins previously unavailable in certain crops. There is still very little research or the ability to do research on long-term affects because GMOs are still very new (within the past 20 years). Inserting or deleting genes in various plants is how we synthesize GM crops, enabling those plants to resist drought, resist pesticides, grow in non-native environments, or produce more (Schnurr, lecture, September 24, 2015). This allows people, especially in the developing world, to get more nutrition from

First of all, GMO has been linked to multiple health problems for humans and animals proven in labs. GMO can cause sickness, and death. GM foods were linked to toxic, allergic reactions, sick, sterile, and dead livestock. They also damage almost every organ studied in animal labs (Smith 7). GM foods are damaging to most living organisms. Allergies have increased throughout the years since GMO was created. Food Allergies in children under 18 have increased from 3.4%- 5.1%. People believed GM foods is linked (Colbert 8). Scientists are not allowed to provide proof of health risks in GM. “He says that biologists who point out health or other risks associated with GM

One of the strongest arguments supporting GM foods is that they can get the plants to produce higher yields. This is extremely beneficial as it means less seeds will have to be planted to produce the same amount so farmers will have more space to grow. GM foods will be imperative if our population continues growing at its current rate while maintaining the same diet, because the demand for global livestock feed will double by 2050 (Dearden & Mitchell, 2016). Roughly 40% of global crop calories are used as livestock feed and that number will only grow with the population. With traditional crops, this would be unattainable, simply because there would not be enough room to simultaneously support a population that size and grow all its food. Another argument that supports GM foods is that some GM crops have been modified to produce their own toxin while others have resistance to certain herbicides. The use of GM crops requires less amounts of pesticide being used which is both beneficial to the environment and our health. Their usage can help the environment because using less pesticides which contaminate soil, water, and other vegetation, will decrease the impact of the chemicals in the pesticide which the ecosystem faces. Regarding our health, a benefit which has been observed in some GM crops is the reduction of occupational exposure to pesticide related illnesses amongst farm workers (Huang et al., 2006). Furthermore, the ability to alter the nutritional content in foods is

After genes were discovered, scientists have been trying to disclose the mysteries of them. Since genes are the basic building blocks of organism, they are extremely crucial to the development of biological science. Genetic engineering seems to help the scientists explore the genomes. Genetic engineering is a relatively new technology that is used to manipulate the genome of an organism. It can be utilized to raise plants, cure diseases, create genetically modified babies, and clone living organisms. In other words, scientists can use genomes as Lego blocks to build or change an organism. When an innovative idea is introduced to people, two groups manifest: one that supports the idea and one that opposes it. Recently, as the products of the technology, such as GMO food, get increasingly more involved in human’ lives, people start to debate whether genetically engineering is more beneficial or harmful. On the surface of the issue, genetic engineering seems to only serve benefits. However, while the development of genetic engineering can change our world for the better, it has various negative influences on the human race in many aspects: it is harmful toward the agricultural environment; it acts against nature; and it creates ethical problems. Scientists must consider the disadvantages of the technology carefully, before they over-develop it to an extent that it creates irreversible harms which can impair the entire human race.

The use of genetic modification of organisms is the process of extracting deoxyribonucleic acid from an organism and combing fragments (genes) of it with DNA of a separate organism. Consequently introducing new characteristics into the separate organism which alter its phenotypes and genotypes, furthermore when bred it will provide it’s offspring with different genotypical and phenotypical traits due to its parent/s alteration. The repercussions of genetic engineering with the intentions of increasing food production can vary in numerous ways. Evidentially the altering of organic natural material into something suggestively artificial and synthetic is popularly revealed as hazardous. Considering this, people often demand food in its natural form, despite GMO’s exceptional properties.