Pro Gun Control Pros And Cons

The United States has 88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and per capital number in the world. 22% of Americans own one or more guns (35% of men and 12% of women). America's pervasive gun culture stems in part from its colonial history, revolutionary roots, frontier expansion, and the Second Amendment, which states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control laws state that the Second Amendment was intended for militias; that gun violence would be reduced; that gun restrictions have always existed; and that a majority of Americans, including gun owners, support new gun restrictions.

The topic that I have chosen to write about is should there be more gun control laws be enacted. What does gun control do you may ask? Gun control is any kind of firearm that is bought or sold. What will be in the essay will be different things of Pros and Cons on the different things that gun control is in. The gun control law should not be enforced more is should be managed better for people who do not know what they are doing. The Second Amendment protects the people the rights to own guns. As us the people we have the right to bare arms for the need of protecting ourselves.

You’re in your house and someone breaks in. Oh no, gun control laws said you can’t have a gun! You have no protection, so you’re dead within seconds. This is why the U.S. does not need tougher gun control laws. We need guns for protection, we should have the right to conceal one at all times, and the second amendment says we can have a firearm.

With an increase in the number of mass shootings that have occurred in the United States in the last few years the issue of gun control laws has become a prevalent topic of debate throughout American society. This debate stems from two opposing arguments over gun control. Some feel gun control laws are fair and not the contributing factor to these mass shootings, whereas, others feel that there is an urgent need for strict laws in order to end the problem of mass shootings. There are numerous pros and cons to the enforcement of stricter gun control laws but we must note a few things: stricter gun control laws would interfere with the second amendment, it is not the gun that kills it is the individual, and it is ultimately not laws that are

un control is a very controversial topic especially in today's society; whether gun control is good or bad is a very talked about subject especially when it comes to the United States. This is a very touchy subject because guns are a part of a lot of people's daily lives. People that are anti gun control believe that no one should be able to put any restrictions on guns. They believe that people should be able to buy a firearm just like a pair of boots or a tool. They also believe that if someone were able to take away the firearms from the law abiding citizens that just leaves firearms in the hands of people that do not abide by the law and leaves them defenseless. In 1791 our founding fathers gathered and ratified the Second amendment. The

As Boss (2017) mentions, The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (p. 164). Gun control has always been a controversial issue. Due to shootings related to culture, schools, robberies, movie theatres, and accidents, guns have become an object of violence, fear, and danger. All people have been affected by gun violence or have heard of an event related to gun violence. The two articles that will be analyzed are Erik Gilbert’s “Stop Worrying About Guns in the Classroom. They’re Already Here” and a testimony by Mark Kelly “Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on Gun Violence on Gun Violence on January 30, 2013”. After comparing arguments through different premises from both articles, one essay will be chosen superior to the other.

Despite centuries of evidence that gun control laws do not lower crime, stop violence, or make society safer in any way, gun control advocates continue to chip away at our Second Amendment rights. For a group (yes, liberals) who typically don’t care for hard work, working hard to rob us of our freedom to keep and bear, seems to suit them just fine.

The high rates of gun violence and accidents in the United States have long aroused public concern, in view of the strong correlation between gun prevalence, many people believe that the United States must adopt stricter gun control measures to reduce the huge number of firearms across the nation. These people are known as gun control proponents, or advocates. However, many other people do not think so. In their eyes, the serious firearm problems do not result from gun prevalence, and many people would say it is not gun’s problem, people are pushing our society of violence and murder. Consequently, these people, known as gun control opponents, strongly oppose the gun regulations proposed by control advocates. The two sides of the gun

Gun control is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians. The debate over gun control has come up for debate across the United States after two mass shootings rocked the country. The common argument for gun control is that gun control works. When simply in reality that argument is invalid because when you limit guns or even take them away in some cases the murder rate rises. Not only does gun control not work but the laws are racist and gives the government to much power. The idea of gun control infringes on the rights of citizens and takes away their safety.

Each citizen needs a gun to protect themselves from bad people and bad people and unlawful people don’t need guns. In today’s society, there are so many pro and con arguments for gun control laws. One pro argument is that if we had more gun control laws this would lower gun deaths within our country. One con argument is gun control laws do not prevent crime but gun ownership can stop or discourage crime.

Do we need gun control laws? Should everyone own a gun for self-defense? Gun control is a hot button issue, especially in the wake of so many recent, tragic mass shootings. It is also a polarizing issue, which means that it tends to divide people.People should have guns for self defense. I believe certain people shouldn't be able to have guns for these reasons why. The most common state gun control laws include background checks, waiting periods, and registration requirements to purchase or sell guns, Most states prevent carrying guns, including people with a concealed carry permit, on K-12 school grounds and many states prevent carrying on college campuses.Some states ban assault weapons.

Gun control has been a controversial subject in the country for many years. Should we make guns illegal or not? Should people be allowed to have guns on school campus? The states are still in control of their own gun laws and recently Georgia has decided to pass the House Bill 280, also known as the “campus carry” law, which went in effect July 1st. This law allows students, who are over 21, to carry their concealed weapon to any public college campus. Whether this was the right choice is still up to debate.

I’m going to start out with the pros of gun control and the arguments that people of this side tend to use for people who are against gun control. Doing research on this topic has brought up a lot of interesting information, especially on pro-gun control. Obviously the first benefit on gun control would be decrease gun deaths. A statics shows that since 1999 to 2013 there has been 464,033 deaths by guns, ranging from violent crimes to suicides. Which makes death by firearms the 12th leading cause of death in the United States. “ American Children under age 15 were nine times more likely to die of gun accident that children in other advanced countries” David Frum, Daily Beast. Another pressing issue for gun control supporters

One of the most debated issues in our country—gun control—has been discussed since the first colony was created on North American soil. Gun enthusiasts have lectured about the faults of gun control, and the idea of guns has long been immortalized in the U.S.A. Yet, tens of thousands of people are killed every year by these beloved weapons. It’s time to address the facts—guns are not the perfect defender that everyone thinks they are, and they are much too easy to obtain. Other countries with strict gun control laws have lower gun suicide and homicide rates, guns are almost never used in self-defense, and—despite the fact that the Second Amendment was designed to defend the rights of militias to own guns, not the rights of individuals—to get a gun, all you have to do is walk into a shop and pay. In Florida and other states, you do not even need a permit to buy a gun, you do not need a gun license, and once you buy it you

Gun control has been a people issue for decades, and the fight for or against it is getting stronger with each coming year. From the Columbine shooting to the most recent Santa Fe High School shooting, it seems as though guns are the perpetrator. The greatest defense against gun control is the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” John Paul Stevens, a 98 year old former associate justice suggested that America should repeal the Second Amendment, sparking controversy amongst liberals and conservatives. But should the Second Amendment actually be repealed? Should America ban guns completely to limit gun crime? Simply