Pro Life Vs Pro Choice Research Paper

The restrictions and the debate that surrounds the issue of abortion has changed dramatically throughout the course of history and it continues to change until this very moment. All around the world and in every known society, women have used abortion to control their reproduction, regardless of it’s legality. Abortion used to be exercised freely in the United Sates, up Until all the states started to ban It and place a lot of restrictions on it. They stated that a woman can not abort except in extreme cases in which the mother’s life might be in danger. After the restrictions caused a lot of health issues and raised concerns on women’s health, The Government abolished all the restrictions. In this paper I will analyze and discuss three main positions on the issue of abortion. First, there are those who associate themselves with the title “pro-life”. These individuals are anti abortion, birth control, embryo research or anything that can control or cause any harm to the fetus. Second, there are those who at the other end of the spectrum who firmly believe that if a woman decides to abort, then it is her constitutional right to do so without any interference from the government. Third, are those who believe that if a woman is raped or her life is in danger, then abortion should be completely and solely up to the woman, but other than that, abortion should be illegal. This group of individuals are also for birth control and do not oppose educating

Abortion is one of the most controversial topics in America today. Throughout history, many people have had violent confrontations and even lost their life over the matter of one’s opinion on abortion and weather or not they are pro-life or pro-choie. The fight between supporters of these two groups has been long and brutal, and is one that gained a large audience in 1973 with the Roe vs. Wade supreme court case. That same fight continues today and is one that will always be a controversial topic. This controversy is important because, despite what society may believe, abortion is neither right nor wrong. The topic of abortion in the United States is the matter of a personal opinion, and there is no one “right” belief to have because both

The Pro-Choice side is often mistakenly defined as the argument for abortion. Actually it is not an argument for abortion as much as it is for a woman's right to chose. Some Pro-Choice supporters are totally agaisnts abortion, but are in favor of the woman's right to choose. This side tend to not personify a fetus until birth, therefore giving it no right to life and leaving the choice of what a woman does to her body to her. Though Pro-Life supporters consider a fetus as an innocent human being, some people can justify abortion still. In Jane English's argument she is able to illustrate a situation in which the killing of an innocent person is justifiable. Pro-Choice supporters also raise an interesting point of our moral obligation to help these women. They believe that if a woman really wants an abortion she will have one, legal or not. They believe it is our duty as moral citizens to provide for their well being by givin them a well suited medical environment and qualified doctor to help them. Still, can it be right to put the exsistence of a creature in the life of a woman? Will all women think responsibily before proceeding

Abortion is among one of the world’s greatest debates. Americans hold the notion that someone is either pro-abortion or anti-abortion; there is no in-between. There is so much research to support both sides of the issue. For those who support abortion there is research that says that the choice belongs to every woman. There are certain circumstances that support this claim. A woman’s choice to have an abortion is her right. Is it right? Is it murder? There are countless people that view abortion as a tremendous sin, and strongly believe that it is one of the worst sins that can be committed. A fetus does not have the ability to stand up and argue and fight for their chance to live and breathe in this miraculous world. For the people who stand against abortion, those who believe that it is a woman’s choice are seen as the enemy. Advocates for anti-abortion can turn to protests and other activities to support their opinions on the subject. So, what is right and what is wrong? Each person has the right to choose what they believe in. Just like in any other matter in life. A person was guaranteed the right to choose when they were born. A colossal controversy in the discussion of pro and anti-abortion is whether these unalienable rights pertain to the unborn fetus growing inside the mother who legally has the right to choose. Do these rights only belong to those who have breathed their first breath? Anti-abortion advocates will say that in no way is abortion right. These two

To most pro-choice advocates, an embryo/fetus is not considered a person, because the apparent pain a fetus experiences during an abortion is false, and most people do not believe that life begins at conception. The main concern surrounding abortion for pro-choicers stems from a woman’s right to control her body and what happens to it. Just as a woman is able to decide when she takes birth control, and when she has sex, she should also be able to decide when she has an abortion.. Many say that no baby should be born into an unstable environment where it is unwanted, and that abortion eliminates many of those cases. Since both parties know abortions will happen regardless of legalism, making abortion legal also reduces the amount of abortions performed underground. Therefore, it is safer for women if abortions are

Ever since 1973, the days of the famous court case Roe v Wade, abortion has been at the forefront of many debates. Over time, the parties for and against the idea of abortion have come to be known as the pro-lifers and the pro-choicers, respectively. The arguments are quite simple: the pro-life group wants abortion illegal, sometimes even in the extreme cases, and the pro-choice enthusiasts want it perfectly legal. It can be hard to decide what side of the aisle you stand on...that is, until you’ve heard the arguments. The pro-choice case revolves around the idea that women have the authority over their body to perform an elective abortion. There is a problem with this, however. Obviously, when an abortion is performed the child’s life is terminated...permanently.

Abortion has been one of the most debated topics in the United States for more than a century. There is the anti-abortionist group that believe abortion should be permanently banned from not only the U.S but also worldwide. We live in a world today that abortion takes place every second of everyday. Abortion has become a big issue in today’s generation because of the high percentage of unprotected sex and uncontrolled hormones followed by the miss connection and lack of responsibility and most importantly what the outcomes bring to the table. There are numerous of different perspectives being argued and supported with strong beliefs

Abortion has been one of the biggest controversies of all time. The definition of abortion is “the termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion of the uterus of a fetus or embryo prior to being capable of normal growth.” Many individuals view it as immoral and even consider it to be murder, while others believe in the idea that the woman has the right to choose what she wants to do with the fetus. The debate on the topic of abortion has been cast in terms of pro-life and pro-choice views, but it is clearly a much more complex issue.

The act of abortion has desensitized the majority of Americans today. Abortion is murder, and even worse, it has become normal and accepted in society. Pro-Choice activists are convinced that a woman has a right to the privacy of her own body and a right to abort her pregnancy. Pro-Choice activists believe that because a fetus in the first trimester cannot survive outside the womb they are not yet human. Therefore, Pro-Choice activists believe that a fetus in the first trimester cannot be given human rights. The argument that a fetus is not human based on its ability to survive on its own is not a valid argument. Within the first trimester, or the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, the fetus has developed a heartbeat, fingerprints, and the functioning of all body systems.2 The fetus is alive and should have every right that the mother has. If an infant were to be left alone without someone to care for it, it could not survive on its own. This should not be cause to terminate the life of the infant. An infant is a human being, and therefore, has rights that are protected under the Constitution. The same rights should be extended to the fetus that is developing in the first trimester. Giving a woman the right to terminate the life of a fetus is the same as giving someone the right to murder innocent people. The only difference between the two is that women are now guaranteed the right to murder their baby if they so choose. If an amendment to prohibit abortion were to be passed, it would extend the rights of Americans to a developing baby in the first

All humans from conception to death have the right to life, and should not have their life deprived by the hands of another human being. This statement raises the controversial subject of abortion, which has been a real-world ethical issue for a long period of time. Abortion can be defined as the discontinuation of a pregnancy, accompanied by the removal of an embryo or fetus from the mother’s womb. Abortion is a debatable topic in which every human being has different viewpoints on whether or not abortion should be acknowledged as morally right. Advocates of abortion are pro-life and believe that the morally right course of action is to follow through with the pregnancy to full-term and raise the child or give the child up for adoption.

A topic that is still under much debate is whether or not women should have the right to an abortion. This is a constitutional right that all women must have in order for everyone to have true equal rights. The two sides of this debate argue whether or not the fetus is “alive,” whether abortion is ever necessary, and whether or not the procedure has negative consequences. While the “pro-life” side focuses mostly on the interpretation of the definition of life, “pro-choice” advocates stress the importance of women’s rights. A woman should always have control over her body without having to give a reason.

Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy so that it does not result in the birth of a child. It is no secret the topic of abortion is widely debated. There are two main sides to this controversy: pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-choice supports the right of women to choose whether or not to go to full term with their pregnancy. Pro-life promotes the protection of the fetus, especially by outlawing abortion by equating it to murder. Yet pro-life advocates don’t take into consideration the emotional and physical damage to a woman who is forced to have a baby she may not want or be able to afford. Even a woman who uses birth control may become pregnant, because there is no birth control method that is perfect. Sometimes pregnancy can even be

Doctors Andre and Velasquez from Santa Clara University postulate the difference between a fetus and a 3-month-old baby. They compare how the two individuals by themselves do not possess the capability for survival. If a mother were to terminate a fetus at seven weeks old, her actions would remain justified under the current laws for abortion in some states (Andre and Velasquez). However if she were to drown her child at 3 months old, the courts would intervene and the mother would face twenty-five years to life in a state prison. This pro-choice argument is a smokescreen for the uniformed population. A human being does not have the capability to support itself fully for many years after birth, so the termination of a fetus for any purpose other than a life-threatening condition to the mother is utterly unacceptable. Consequently, an unborn child has the same rights as living humans, thus making abortion constitutionally illegal.

The subject of abortion is one that has caused great controversy throughout many years. The split happens between the individuals called the “pro-life” advocates and the individuals called the “pro-choice” advocates. The pro-lifers believe that terminating pregnancies is wrong because every human, even the unborn since life begins at conception, has the inalienable right to live. Meanwhile, the pro-choice supporters believe that a woman should be able to make all the decisions pertaining her body. A court ruling in the Roe vs Wade case was in favor of the pro-choice side and declared that women had the right to have induced terminations. However, abortion is wrong and unjust due to the fact that it is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath, a promoting factor for a culture in which human life is disposable and can also jeopardize the health of the mother.

Abortion in today’s society is a controversial issue. With detailed and complicated arguments on both sides of this significant topic, it ultimately comes down to a person’s morals and whether or not they believe in pro-choice or pro-life. Abortion is very common. In America, 1 out of 3 women will have an abortion in their life, but the deep emotions ignited by this matter leave it little room to accurately and thoughtfully debate between the choices of whether abortion should be banned or accepted. Someone who is pro-choice believe that individuals have unrestricted control over their body, in regards to their own reproductive system. Those who claim pro-life advocate for full legal protection of their fetus and embryo, regardless of intent or other concerns. In this specific debate, my opinion guided me to believe in pro-life and the protection and preservation of it. I realized this choice is completely compatible with my morals.