Probation Offenders

Probation and Parole is apart of community policing that deals with ethics, integrity, values. This promotes and supports organization strategies to address the cause and reduce the fear of crime and social disorders through problem solving approaches and community partnership. Ethics is used when addressing moral conduct. Integrity is used when one if true to themselves and would not do anything dishonorable. Values are social principles that are being upheld.The main roles of an officer in the criminal justice field is to maintain order, crime prevention, public education, delivery of service and enforcement of laws. The officers work hand in hand with community groups and social service agencies to provide offenders and victims with the support and services they need. Probation Officers maintain partnerships with law enforcement and other justice agencies so the agencies can benefit from the expertise of each other and share information on criminal activity.

On April 14, 2014; the offenders probation complaints were received by the Probation office’s intake department. Thus community supervision had commenced. At that time, he signed the rules and regulations associated with his responsibilities while under community supervision and he was also informed of his stipulations relative to his current probation period.

I enjoyed your paper, it was one of the best in providing informative details about specific need and risks. Also, it was mentioned that probation officers should focus more on the offender that pose the most benefit from interventions and treatment. In fact, after reading your paper it is safe to infer that regardless of the risk factor, both should be highly supervised. In addition, a low-risk offender could face difficulties and challenges that require immediate attention because this offender may not be required to receive interventions and treatment due to their classification. While, On the other hand, a high-risk offender receiving both practices becomes less vulnerable of reoffending.

Federal probation was put in place to suspend a current sentence of an inmate and place them under the supervision on a qualified agency for a period of time to either free up the jail from nonviolent offenders or to try rehabilitate the offender from any future criminal acts. The development of the federal probation system began in 1925 when a bill was passed and signed by President Coolidge (Alarid, 2015). Before then, federal probation was rejected as an idea many times because it was introduced during the Prohibition Era. The National Probation Act that supported federal probation was put into effect, but it wasn’t until the mid-1900 that the federal probation law was fully working and overwhelmed as well. Since the work load got to intense

If I were sitting on the President’s Council for probation and parole reform, there are four recommendations I would make. These recommendations would aim to increase the success of probation and parole in the United States. In order to improve outcomes for probation and parole, there are necessary steps to take to reduce the state prison costs. One recommendation is the need to create a program that can provide more incentives financially to departments in order to minimize state prisons. I suggest funding the program through private sectors and savings organized through the funds paid by probationers. Probation departments use incentives payments and promote better safety for the public. (Latessa & Smith, 2011) The new program should involve

I also worked with a few Probation officers; they let me get on a database called absconders. This database is for people who are under probation/parole and have not came in for the office visits. The reason for them missing could be that they’re back in jail, hospitalized, or even dead. I used the absconders’ information to contact any and all people associated with the offender with hope of contacting the offender. I explained that it was important for them to contact the officer before a warrant was issued their arrest. Out of the seven people I searched for that was in absconders, I was able to get contact four offenders. Working with absconders was very tedious considering the lengths that had to be done to contact missing offending. From

In the article “Evaluating reentry programming in Pennsylvania’s board of Probation & Parole: An assessment of offenders’ perceptions and recidivism outcomes” by Jesse S. Zortman, Thomas Powers, Michele Hiester, Frederick R. Klunk & Michael E. Antonio, explain the positive outcome of reentry programs for offenders under supervision. The research conducted used the outcomes from the Reentry Program in Pennsylvania, and focused on offender’s issues faced when reentering back into the community (Zortman, Powers, Hiester, Klunk & Antonio, 2016). Researchers Philips and Spencer pointed out the different factors which include education, employment, income, stable housing, family, substance abuse and health issues (Zortman et al., 2016). The reentry

Probation and parole are an important part of the criminal justice process, and both are

I believe that there will always be a contrast in some aspect of probation and parole especially when it comes to balancing roles and styles of supervision. “Many feel that the true "professional" finds a way of integrating various role expectations, balancing them, and weighing the appropriateness of various expressions of the roles. It is probable that the treatment-surveillance dichotomy will remain forever.”(Latessa, 2015, p.211). To conclude, officers can directly impact the outcome of an offender on probation or parole by getting involved more with providing assistance where the offender lacks the resources to do so. For example, rather than referrals to certain programs, offenders who are considered high-risk can be given extensive counseling on drug and alcohol abuse which could help them get the necessary attention they need. Another discretionary decision a PO can make in regards to high-risk offenders is counseling on marital and family relationships, educational goals, and employment strategies. Although probation and parole are supervisions that are prescribed during different phases of the correctional experience they are both about rehabilitation which is the intent and aim for the PO assigned to a

The purpose of this paper is to examine the revocation process for probation and parole and the differences in the processes. As it is viewed probation and parole should be combined due to how close they are to each other. While there are some differences between the two and what they require of the inmate to do. The same punishment is received when a parolee or probationer does not obey their condition could be sent back to prison till further notice. When a probationer or parole commits a crime again will be revoked and more than likely will never receive it again. (Clear, Reisig, & Cole, 2014)

Furthermore, probation officers have a lot more on their caseload than just monitoring offenders. Some work with the courts, and most do the Static-99 form, a risk assessment before a sex offender is release from a penitentiary. Still with all this training and knowledge, they are not allowed to carry a firearm. As well, probation officer monitor sex offender on parole as well, which is a parole officer job. They also fill out a presentence investigation report (PSIR) for the

Restrictions placed on a probationer are to ensure the probation serves their period of rehabilitation and meets necessary goals. Id. at 875. The process to meet these goals requires the probationer be appropriate supervised to make sure restrictions are followed. Id. This is why conditions providing for random home visits or warrantless searches are common. Id. Research suggests more intensive supervision can reduce recidivism. Id.

Probation and parole, although different, are often thought to be the same thing, since they are commonly grouped together. Someone who has been granted probation has been allowed to remain in the community as long as set conditions are followed. Parole, on the other hand, is granted to an offender who has completed part of a prison sentence and is able to be released while also following conditions once out. Some of these conditions include drug testing, maintaining employment, and not having contact with other convicted felons (Matejkowski, et al. 521). The current probation and parole system is keeping some offenders out, but what can be altered to help more stay out?

1. IPS - The term IPS, also known as intensive probation supervision, is defined by the Criminal Justice Today textbook as "a form of probation supervision involving frequent face-to-face contact between the probationer and the probation officer" (Schmalleger 399). This type of probation has been described as the "strictest form of probation for adults in the United States," and is designed to achieve control in a community setting over offenders who would otherwise go to prison. Some states have extended intensive supervision to paroles, allowing the early release of some who would otherwise serve longer prison terms. The book also mentions that this type of probation can be effective by saying, "a study published in 2000 shows that IPS programs can be effective at reducing recidivism, especially if the programs are well planned and fully implemented" (Schmalleger 400). Essentially, it is known as a unit with the purpose of protecting the community, reducing recidivism, helping rehabilitate, and diverting juvenile and adult probationers from further involvement in crime. These objectives are pursued by closely monitoring probationers and establishing relationships with the families and schools for juveniles involved and other supporting agencies, including, but not limited to, police departments, mental health agencies, social services and community treatment programs. According to the judicial branch of Arizona, Maricopa County website, the Adult Intensive Probation

The belief in a new beginning is a tenet of religions morals and ethics, which allows sinners to repent and be fully redeemed, to be reborn. The idea that people deserve a second chance is an important value in life, few times a lot of young men and women even grown adult make certain mistakes whether due to economic circumstances, immaturity, lack of adult mentor guidance or simple peer pressure. Sadly, most of them could have done something meaningful with their lives, if given the chance to prove themselves. As humans, we seek insights into our failings so we can learn to overcome them and achieve a new start, cause as we all know, no one is perfect.