Probation Officer Violation Process

Probation Orientation Meetings are held on a monthly basis at the District Office as apart to help reentry initiatives. While in an informal setting, a probation officer and the sentencing judge explains the conditions, requirements and answer question. This assist the offender in understanding what is required to successfully complete probation.

According to Legal Dictionary, usually the probation officer decides the punishment for the offender. The officer can then choose to issue a warning, add more conditions to their probation, or have them go to court for probation violation hearing as stated in Legal Dictionary. According to Legal Dictionary, the most common types of probation violation are: failure to appear in court, failure to meet with a probation officer, failure to pay fines, associating with other offenders, traveling out of the county or state, possessing, using, or selling drugs, or being arrested for any reason. There are also many studies about what can be done to make sure offenders does not reoffend. According to the National Reentry Resource Center, they believed probation officers should: effectively access probationers’ criminogenic risks and needs, as well as strengths, employ smart, tailored supervision strategies, use incentives and graduated sanctions, and implement performance- driven personnel management. Probation can help many people, it also gives people a second

Studies have found that many violations of parole supervision are technical violations instead of the parole reoffending. Technical violations can range from a curfew to stipulations that the parole must not drink alcohol or be in a house that contains alcohol. These technical violations, while some may consider small or insignificant violation, can cause hardships and negative outcomes for the parolee.

rogress: On 2/6/17 CPSW received an email from Ms. Messerli's probation officer reporting that Ms. Messerli has not remained law abiding and she has not remained sober. Ms. Messerli was no show to her PO appointment and she did not stay sober. Ms. Messerli has an appointment with her probation on 2/8/17. The probation officer reported that if Ms. Messerli is a no show again to her appointment, she will issue a probation violation for 1). Failing to meet with probation, 2). Failing to complete a Rule 25, 3). Failing to remain law-abiding 4). Failing to remain

Law and order are two words that keep our society from collapsing on its self. We the American people have our freedom to do what ever we want; we can purse any career, go down to your favorite restaurant and order whatever you want. We have these freedoms because people fought for them many years ago, so that we wouldn’t be under rule or dictatorship. Many people take our freedom for granted and end up on probation, in jail, or prison. In this paper I will be outlining the case of Kris, and his probation officer’s view. I will also develop a profile for a perfect candidate to participate in an intensive supervised probation

Well, this all seems pretty simple and straight forwards right? I mean if you are on probation and you do something you shouldn’t have, then you will most likely be violated and suffer the consequences. So what protection does the probationer have against improper procedures and sentences you may ask? Well, there are four such cases in which a state or local government violated the rights of the accused probation violator, and as a result, the United States Supreme Court had to step in. These cases laid the groundwork to ensure that probationers are granted their right to due process under U.S. law.

Parole and probation departments are a key essential tool for the department of the corrections and detention systems. They both serve the criminal justice system in assisting with overcrowding in prisons and detention centers. The definition of parole is giving a prisoner permission to leave the prison before the end of his/her sentence for good behavior. The definition of probation is when someone has committed a crime and is allowed to stay out of confinement if he or she has good behavior and does not commit another crime. Both probation and parole conduct regular drug screens and pop ups on both parties involved in these parties.

These restrictions come in many different forms and are implemented in different ways. One of these restrictions include being in “intensively monitored treatment,” mandated by drug courts. (Allen, et al, 2014, p. 13) This method is used as a way to help offenders get control of their drug problem, instead of sending them to prison. (Allen, et al, 2014) Another possible restriction for those on probation, originally “used for property offenders on probation,” is electronic monitoring. (Allen, et al, 2014, p. 117) It is used to track those on probation to make sure they are following the time and location guidelines placed on them during their time on probation. (Allen, et al, 2014) These are just two of the possible restrictions that are placed on those on probation. The restrictions they are given depend on the crime they have been convicted

In Florida, Maryland, and Washington there were test done that proved probation reduced recidivism 8 to 22%. Intensive supervision, remote location monitors, and controlled focus strategies are all what were used to gather evidence (Schmalleger et al, 2009, pg.104). Probation officers goal is to reduce the recidivism rate. The first major role of probation officers consist of interviewing the defendant and preparing the presentence report.

Standard probation is when a person is released from detention, but is still under strict requirements to follow certain rules while being closely supervised for a period of time.

The parole officer explains the rules of parole and expectations of a party on parole to the defendant and monitors his progress. As with a regular probation, if a defendant fails to comply with his parole conditions, then the parole officer could file a report with the parole board. The parole board may, based on the defendant's behavior while on parole, order the defendant returned to prison to finish the balance of his sentence.

Parole allows our criminals an early release from prison with a strategy and a promise that this prisoner will return to become a productive member of society. Probation on the other hand, is an almost release opportunity for the offender to go back into society. Both have their parole officers to check in with by order of the court system. Both offer reintegration into their communities. However, there’s a risk that follows the offenders such as recidivism. It’s no surprise that criticisms surround the parole and probation due to the victimization of the offender’s communities. Probation is a privilege that can be revoked by the courts, withdrawing the offender’s conditional freedoms if any parole violation occurs. Community corrections are

Also, the parolees have a right in being notified of the charges against them and the evidence. They can speak on their behalf and to have witnesses present, confront any witness that is against them. The second stage is the revocation hearing, must receive the notice of charges and have disclosed the evidence of violation. A hearing body shall determine if violation is sufficiently severe to warrant revocation. Also, provide a written statement outlining the reason for the decision and

The courts now and again offer probation to wrongdoers as opposed to sending them to jail. The individual must comply with terms and states of probation as put forward by the judge. Specialists in the field have faced off regarding the upsides and downsides of probation following the time when the primary post-trial supervisor, John Augustus, requested of the courts for supervised release in 1841.

Probation, as defined by Bartollas and Siegel, is “a form of punishment which allows the offender to remain in the community under supervision of a probation officer and is subject to certain conditions as set forth by the court” (2013). As such, the issue of probation supervision presents several challenges unique to this type of judicial punishment.