Problems And Responsibilities Of Eureka Mining Company

Employers have duties under health and safety law to assess risks in the workplace. Risk assessments should be carried out that address all risks that might cause harm in the workplace. Employers must give employees information about the risks in their workplace and how they are protected, also instruct and train their employees on how to deal with the risks. Employers must consult employees on health and safety issues. Consultation must be either direct or through a safety representative that is either elected by the workforce or appointed by a trade union. It is an employees duty to take reasonable care of their own health and safety. If possible avoid wearing jewellery or loose clothing if operating machinery. If the employee has long hair or wears a headscarf, make sure it's tucked out of the way (it could get caught in machinery). To take reasonable care not to put other people such as fellow employees and members of the public at risk by what they do or don't do in the course of their work. To co-operate with the employer, making sure the employee gets proper training and the employee understands and follows the company's health and safety policies. Not to interfere with or misuse anything that's been provided for their health, safety or welfare. To report any injuries, strains or illnesses they suffer as a result of doing their job (the employer may need to change the way they work). To tell their employer if something

Reporting of Injuries,Diseases and dangerous occurrences regulations of 1995 requires the reporting of work-related accidents, diseases and dangerous occurrences. The Act applies to all work related activities, but not to all work related incidents. The objective of the regulations is to enable the enforcing authorities to identify where and how risks arise and to investigate serious accidents so as to prevent them from occurring in the future and thus providing a safer work environment. The enforcing authorities can then help and advise you on preventive action to reduce injury, ill health and accidental loss,the main points of our own policy that relate to this are:

The human resources process has to accompany both the employee and employer in regard to safety issues. An employee wants the assurance of safe and healthy working conditions; anything less exposes danger to their own wellbeing. In addition employees must take heed to precautions design by the organization. However an employer wants to avoid expenditures in overhead by cutting cost or corners often putting their employees at harmful risk. In addition, organizations also have a lawful obligation in which they have to provide a safe workplace by preventing accidents, hazards, serious injuries or accident-related deaths. Negligence on either behalf can result in determination, fines, citations, work-related

The impact of workplace injury is wide reaching because when hazards of physical and psychological type affect a worker, the impact is not only on the person, but also on the life, the family and of course on the future plans,as well as high

Employers are ethically bound to do all they can to ensure that employees do not suffer illness, serious injury or death. They are by law required to carry out risk assessments as any accidents and injuries occurred which have not been risk assessed could inflict significant costs on the company.

“The Minera San Esteban Primera Company” does not have a good track record over the years in regards to safety, which have included several fatal accidents at the worksites. The person issuing a public statement regarding the Chilean copper mine collapse must know the audience that is receiving the message. In a case like this, the company must be aware that this will shed a very bleak picture of their company to the recipients. The company should understand what their employees might need to hear from them. Employees would need to be assured that measures will be taken to improve work conditions, which will make for a safer work environment. The employees would also need to hear that the company is going to compensate the workers appropriately for working in such dangerous conditions. The company can address these issues by establishing some type of safety or operational risk management (ORM) program. As for the compensation, the company could tell the employees that a worker’s compensation program is being developed, which would enable the workers to beat ease if something like this were to happen again. This would also show the employees that the company does actually care about them and not just the money. Also, when communicating to the employees the company can acknowledge or accept their failures to ensure a safe work environment.

According to the Health and Safety Act 1974 employers have to reduce risk ‘so far as it is reasonably practicable’ which means that employers have to make sure they look after health and safety procedures in the workplace and try to prevent the risk of incidents occurring in the organisation. Employers must safeguard the health and safety of individuals that work for them as well as customers/clients that could be visiting the premises.

In the event that somebody is injured at work the first thing one needs to remember is

With the critical considerations of the case, Sopranos Smallgoods has been confronted with a diverse set of negative issues relative to workplace safety. The fundamental employees and supervisors have the low level of attitudes and behaviours to support workplace safety, and the company of Sopranos does not have the effective mechanism and physical infrastructure facilities to support the workplace safety mission.

After the compliance officer from OSHA visited the facility there were some workers who were injured and some

Management did not encourage the development of an occupational health and safety committee. The company never encouraged the committee to meet and discuss safety concerns and management was not involved with the committee. There were also problems with mining inspections, government investigations into this problem produced irregularities. Many orders issued by mining inspectors were not carried out. Management and mining inspectors not ensuring that safety standards were followed is a human hazard.

Your workplace accidents is not a book you should write brief details of the accident and injuries, and send them to your employer and keep a copy. Your contract you work on your employer to report an injury that may mean. If you are self-employed, you Health and Safety Executive (HSE) or local authority environmental health department for injuries resulting legal obligation to report certain accidents.

Throughout Australia some workplaces are of high risk as there are many hazards involved in the business that may cause injuries, disease or even the worst possible scenario death to employees, that specific and calculated regulation of practice are applied to control these hazards and make these dangers working conditions for employees as safe as possible.

Duty of care: Workers have a responsibility to work safely so they don’t cause any harm to themselves and others, this responsibility lays at the workplace for everybody: contractors, visitor’s volunteers and casual worker. Everyone mast take personal responsibility for their only action and every one must follow health and safety procedures.

The Pike River Coal Mine faced numerous complexities from its establishment. Firstly, it was constructed without the right engineering knowledge. It is evident that the leaders sought cheap mechanisms that could save funds. However, the management’s ideas led to one of the biggest mine accidents in New Zealand. The lack of concentrating on improving safety programs is a recipe for disaster as portrayed by the Pike River accident. Adequate knowledge of skilled engineers should have been sought in the development of this mine. The rights of employees in regards to workplace safety should also have been observed and adhered to by the relevant